hh will there be vaults and do you think it looks a bit empt : Fallout: New Vegas

» Sat May 28, 2011 3:43 pm

it looks a bit empty no trees. i dont think they would bomb a canyon so were is everything mr house shot down some bombs and they have snow and trees and rivers. it just looks like rocks and dust with a few people fighting the burned man could look better his bandages are very clean for someone who lives in a wastland. and why is he living in a cave and not an old vault loaded with guns ammo and tec and a small army of bible nuts with holy hand grenade

» Sat May 28, 2011 3:04 pm

i think there should be one, maybe 2 vaults.

» Sat May 28, 2011 4:29 am

Yeah, it's set in a http://cache.virtualtourist.com/1632972-Zion_Canyon-Zion_National_Park.jpg, not exactly known for urban development.

» Sat May 28, 2011 4:47 pm

im sure no one was worried about ruining a national park when they were building vaults to survive a nuclear war

» Sat May 28, 2011 9:47 am

im sure no one was worried about ruining a national park when they were building vaults to survive a nuclear war

In reponse as to why the place looks 'a bit empty'.

» Sat May 28, 2011 4:17 pm

im sure no one was worried about ruining a national park when they were building vaults to survive a nuclear war

One thing to realize is that even if there was one or two there, it's not like they're putting signs around it saying "BOMB/INVADE HERE"

» Sat May 28, 2011 10:47 am

I doubt they'll be a vault in the park but you never know.

» Sat May 28, 2011 9:25 am

You think they'd show off their best spots in a vid?

» Sat May 28, 2011 3:20 am

Yeah, it's set in a http://cache.virtualtourist.com/1632972-Zion_Canyon-Zion_National_Park.jpg, not exactly known for urban development.

This ^

I hope there are no Vaults.

» Sat May 28, 2011 8:40 am

This ^

I hope there are no Vaults.

i only want one in old world blues

» Sat May 28, 2011 4:34 pm

And i DO hope there is one vault. http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Vault_70 anyone ?

» Sat May 28, 2011 9:52 am

think that looks empty? wait until you see The Divide.... *tumbleweeds roll past*

Contrast with the Big Empty, which isn't. Empty. Irony much Chris?

» Sat May 28, 2011 1:01 pm

Well it is a national park so it should be relatively empty and they do show what appear to be the ruins of a ranger station so there should be a few more buildings but who's to say how much of it we've actually seen.

» Sat May 28, 2011 1:09 pm

and its only the same price as deadmoney so how big will it be also the lack of stuff might be because off bugs the more details they put in it the more bugs we get might be why new vegas is empty ill by the other dlc but i hope fallout 4 will be much better with the new game engine witch we will get to see in action soon with oblivion :celebration:

» Sat May 28, 2011 10:26 am

A Vault might make a little sense if you consider that (maybe) national parks wouldn't be considered vital targets, and thus a nice place to build a hidden bunker. Assuming one could keep it hidden, obviously. Otherwise it'd be a target. hahaha. But as always, I know little about FO lore so...

I don't care if it's a Vault of not, but I'd enjoy some more caverns or caves or something to explore vs. only roaming topside & the insides of tiny shacks.

» Sat May 28, 2011 10:33 am

the new game engine witch we will get to see in action soon with oblivion :celebration:

Skyrim?

» Sat May 28, 2011 6:08 pm

I highly doubt the existence of any vaults. Vaults were built around urban areas so people had time to get to them before bombs fell. What's the sense of making a vault that nobody can get to in time.

» Sat May 28, 2011 10:00 am

Skyrim?

sorry yes skyrim

» Sat May 28, 2011 3:52 am

and its only the same price as deadmoney so how big will it be also the lack of stuff might be because off bugs the more details they put in it the more bugs we get might be why new vegas is empty ill by the other dlc but i hope fallout 4 will be much better with the new game engine witch we will get to see in action soon with oblivion :celebration:

I hope PSN is back up by then. I'm a die hard fallout fan but this looks alittle like a common theme that's old take gear fight tribe with fists and crap we'll give u one companion that's interesting but really nothing cause you can't go back 2 dlc location again and you can't bring this new companion with you back to mojave 10 bucks for three hours of story but they're still getting my money ( yes they are says the fallout voices).....lmao

» Sat May 28, 2011 11:49 am

I hope PSN is back up by then. I'm a die hard fallout fan but this looks alittle like a common theme that's old take gear fight tribe with fists and crap we'll give u one companion that's interesting but really nothing cause you can't go back 2 dlc location again and you can't bring this new companion with you back to mojave 10 bucks for three hours of story but they're still getting my money ( yes they are says the fallout voices).....lmao

You can go back has been confirmed. In my opinion I think if you get a companion you can bring him/her back because what is the sense of having a companion that you can only use when in the dlc. They could kill the companion or you won't get one.

» Sat May 28, 2011 9:55 am

I highly doubt the existence of any vaults. Vaults were built around urban areas so people had time to get to them before bombs fell. What's the sense of making a vault that nobody can get to in time.

they could have a goverment bunker there for counter strike like raven rock not for the public and as we all know the vaults was never meant to save lives
they were just for illegal experiments

» Sat May 28, 2011 1:43 pm

I think you guys are all forgetting that the vaults were never meant to save lives. They could have put a vault anywhere.

edit: lol fallout king beat me to it

» Sat May 28, 2011 7:10 am

I think you guys are all forgetting that the vaults were never meant to save lives. They could have put a vault anywhere.

edit: lol fallout king beat me to it

sorry i beat you to it lol id love to see a vault where the people are given a date to open the door and when they do there another door and another door and so on and ten years later when they get to the last door there a note saying were the right door is

» Sat May 28, 2011 2:59 pm

They said there were forests. Just not in the trailer, that all looked like canyon.

As for the bombs, House destroyed most of the ones aimed for Nevada. Not Utah.

» Sat May 28, 2011 4:00 pm

They said there were forests. Just not in the trailer, that all looked like canyon.

As for the bombs, House destroyed most of the ones aimed for Nevada. Not Utah.

i know that house destroyed the ones in navarda so thats why there is less rads around and more plant life and rad free water but i dont think they would target a park with a nuke what would be the point so there should be less rads in the park as well and more green stuff ands nothing stops radiation better than canyon wall so there sould be more green stuff there if anywere