Would you play Skyrim if it had last gen graphics?!?!?!

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:04 pm

I was thinking, Skyrim would still be awesome even if it had last gen graphics (but the exact same gameplay).

I think Bethesda (the publisher) could do very well for itself making (outsourcing) a portable port for the 3DS (with lots of 2D sprites and low poly models).

I think that would be awesome. The system can have 4gb game cards, so why not?

I'd love something like that to play on the bus.

Heck, they could make a game about a small island off tamriel or something, just to tie it all in, be wicked!
User avatar
Beast Attire
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:33 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:03 pm

Doesn't it?
User avatar
cosmo valerga
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:21 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:24 am

Umm...It already has last gen graphics. Only with mods the graphics become close to this gen, but still only DX9.

Edit: If the game looked like Oblivion...I think I would still play it. And mod it to look better. Gameplay is still more important than graphics.
User avatar
Georgine Lee
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:50 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:03 pm

You bet. I think Oblivion looks great.
User avatar
Genevieve
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:22 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:25 pm

To the OP: the graphics are last gen. Fortunately, the game world design is beautiful.
User avatar
Jessica Colville
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:53 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:30 pm

Last gen would be Morrowind, not Oblivion. Oblivion is on the same gaming machine as Skyrim so they are the same generation. Vanilla Morrowind's graphic is quite dated so most people would be turned off after playing Skyrim.

Skyrim on a mid-high PC now should be the same as the next gen consoles coming out in the next 2-5 years.
User avatar
Devils Cheek
 
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:24 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:28 am

Last gen would be Morrowind, not Oblivion. Oblivion is on the same gaming machine as Skyrim so they are the same generation. Vanilla Morrowind's graphic is quite dated so most people would be turned off after playing Skyrim.

No, MW is not last gen. MW used DX8 which is stone age by now. Oblivion is last gen technology and Skyrim graphics, unfortunately, hasn't changed that much. The sad thing is that Skyrim doesn't have godrays and other DX9 shaders that just about every current games have.
User avatar
Janine Rose
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:59 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:22 pm

Shadow of the Colossus is still the best looking game I've ever seen, and the HD remake is even better. The beauty is in the art not the pixel count.


Oblivion looks like hot trash, it's over saturation is just so unappealing.
User avatar
Adam Porter
 
Posts: 3532
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:47 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:08 pm

Skyrim is a "last-gen" game.
User avatar
Kelly Upshall
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:26 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:58 am

The really really sad thing is that there are people out there that think Skyrim's graphics aren't last gen. Industry hype has worked well on people. Just because the PS3/xbox you bought last month was new don't mean it's technology is. For proof of that look at 2007'sPC game Crysis and ask yourself why the consoles have last gen graphics compared to that 5 year old game. If you still think Skyrim is current generation graphics you must be blind.
User avatar
sally coker
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:51 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:44 pm

Gameplay is more important than graphics, but Oblivion/Morrowind style graphics are just too awful for me. I operate on two extremes. Either it's good 3D (Skyrim, Fallout 3/NV..) or it's in 2D (preferably isometric).


If Skyrim was in isometric 2D, hell yeah I would play it.
User avatar
El Khatiri
 
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:43 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:12 pm

The beauty is in the art not the pixel count.

Exactly. That's why I said above about Skyrim having last gen graphics but the game world design as a whole is the best so far in TES.
User avatar
Jason White
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:54 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:45 pm

The really really sad thing is that there are people out there that think Skyrim's graphics aren't last gen. Industry hype has worked well on people. Just because the PS3/xbox you bought last month was new don't mean it's technology is. For proof of that look at 2007'sPC game Crysis and ask yourself why the consoles have last gen graphics compared to that 5 year old game. If you still think Skyrim is current generation graphics you must be blind.

Yet Wind Waker still looks great.
User avatar
Karl harris
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 3:17 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:51 am

Gameplay is more important than graphics, but Oblivion/Morrowind style graphics are just too awful for me. I operate on two extremes. Either it's good 3D (Skyrim, Fallout 3/NV..) or it's in 2D (preferably isometric).


If Skyrim was in isometric 2D, hell yeah I would play it.

The graphical difference between Oblivion and Fallout 3/Skyrim isn't very big. Skyrim uses the same sort of technology with some additions that honestly don't look as good as they ought to by now. Skyrim even has some limitations Morrowind didn't have, which is why I could decorate my house in Morrowind with enough lights to look like a disco.

Gamers these days have an odd obsession with the tools used to create their games rather than the design of the games. Sometimes the dungeons in Skyrim look worse than parts of the dungeons in Daggerfall. It's all in the design, since obviously Daggerfall is very limited on the technical side.

And yes, I play Daggerfall. I'm more interested in game design than graphics most of the time. My favourite additions in Skyrim are the things that make the world more interesting to play in, like the rivers and waterfalls, more ingredients, etc.
User avatar
RUby DIaz
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:18 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:15 pm

The graphical difference between Oblivion and Fallout 3/Skyrim isn't very big. Skyrim uses the same sort of technology with some additions that honestly don't look as good as they ought to by now. Skyrim even has some limitations Morrowind didn't have, which is why I could decorate my house in Morrowind with enough lights to look like a disco.

Gamers these days have an odd obsession with the tools used to create their games rather than the design of the games. Sometimes the dungeons in Skyrim look worse than parts of the dungeons in Daggerfall. It's all in the design, since obviously Daggerfall is very limited on the technical side.

And yes, I play Daggerfall. I'm more interested in game design than graphics most of the time. My favourite additions in Skyrim are the things that make the world more interesting to play in, like the rivers and waterfalls, more ingredients, etc.
It's mostly about the textures, not the meshes. Oblivion had very bright, cartoonish textures and peoples' faces were just science awful while Fallout 3 had much more polished, realistic textures even if the meshes themselves had seen little improvement (since there was no need).
User avatar
Fiori Pra
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:30 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:23 pm

No, MW is not last gen. MW used DX8 which is stone age by now. Oblivion is last gen technology and Skyrim graphics, unfortunately, hasn't changed that much. The sad thing is that Skyrim doesn't have godrays and other DX9 shaders that just about every current games have.

Skyrim is a "last-gen" game.

Are you guys living in the future and playing on your x720? Hello, this is the year 2012 and we are on the seventh generation of consoles, wii, xbox360 and ps3.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_video_game_consoles_(seventh_generation)

PS: please provide next week's lottery numbers.
User avatar
krystal sowten
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:25 pm

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:40 am

Are you guys living in the future and playing on your x720? Hello, this is the year 2012 and we are on the seventh generation of consoles, wii, xbox360 and ps3.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_video_game_consoles_(seventh_generation)

PS: please provide next week's lottery numbers.
no. looks like they are playing battlefield 3 and uncharted 3 like me, wich looks like a 8th gen games, imagine if skyrim looked like uncharted...
User avatar
Michael Russ
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:33 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:04 pm


It's mostly about the textures, not the meshes. Oblivion had very bright, cartoonish textures and peoples' faces were just science awful while Fallout 3 had much more polished, realistic textures even if the meshes themselves had seen little improvement (since there was no need).
I have to say the faces and the body's in oblivion were awful if skyrim had last gen graphics i probably wouldn't have bought it I mean I tried to go back to oblivion for the magic system and I just could not deal with the graphics
User avatar
CHANONE
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:04 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:24 am

Not if it was on the 3DS I wouldn't....
User avatar
Breautiful
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:51 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:51 am

Would it count if someone threw a 256 color shader on top of the graphics and reduced resolution to 1280 x 800?
User avatar
Mr. Allen
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 8:36 am

Post » Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:53 am

Are you guys living in the future and playing on your x720? Hello, this is the year 2012 and we are on the seventh generation of consoles, wii, xbox360 and ps3.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_video_game_consoles_(seventh_generation)

PS: please provide next week's lottery numbers.

Skyrim's graphics are last gen. You know the consoles are outdated right? Call me an elitist, but it's reality. Do you think the PS3 or 360 can run current generation graphics? They can't. Crysis came out 12 months after the ps3 did. Name one game on the PS3 that looks as good as Crysis does. There are none because a year after the PS3 came out graphics on the PC were already capable of so much more than a PS3 could ever hope to do. PC has had DX10 come and go and now we are on DX11. The consoles can't run what is current. Current gen graphics are far past what current gen consoles can do. Just cause you buy a console now don't mean it is current. Them things were outdated compared to PC's the day they launched.

Or wait are you trying to say the phrase "current gen graphics" should only apply to the consoles and we should just ignore the graphics found on the PC? If so then you may have a point, but it would be like living in denial.
User avatar
Kim Bradley
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:00 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:56 pm

I play in 480p when I'm capturing gameplay on my Avermedia - and it's still a looker. That said, the 360 has more than just better screen resolution than the XBOX.
User avatar
Jennifer Munroe
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:57 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:52 pm

I'm still playing Morrowind. I care little for graphics. Besides, I actually think Skyrim looks quite pretty overall, even more so in dwemer dungeons where you got statues and awesome shadows etc.
User avatar
Danielle Brown
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:03 am

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:05 pm

Skyrim is a great game. But if Skyrim had last generation graphics I think the story would be better.
User avatar
Roisan Sweeney
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:28 pm

Post » Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:25 pm

If it was a better game, yes.
User avatar
!beef
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:41 pm

Next

Return to V - Skyrim