Why are you guys beating fo nv in 5 or even 25hrs. You just cheated yourself of over 200 hrs of game play. My first guy is sitting there waiting for HH with 264hrs. My second guy is at 74.

Well it might be short and all but its a DLC not a expansion pack. And it was just 10 bucks, not very expensive IMO.

Which I felt to be a solid length DLC with a good sturdy story behind it and plenty of action [though a lot of it was in spurts] I felt completely jipped paying the same price for Honest Hearts.

I downloaded Honest Hearts Tuesday night before going to bed and started it the next day at 2:30pm played till 3:30pm and when I jumped back on after work at 9:00pm I found I was on the final quest stage. By the end of the night I had gotten through the entire DLC twice [to get both of the ending achievements]. My Fallout IV timer on Steam read 33 hours before booting up, it now reads 36 hours, some of which was spent talking on Steam IM. I got some cool items I'll never use by the end but frankly a DLC is far too short if playing on hardcoe you're never once reminded that you're suffering from minor fatigue, dehydration or hunger. This is including all of the optional quests that seemed to be apparent [having found them myself and confirmed with the wiki]. I think throughout the entire DLC I may have, possibly, killed a total of 40 units, 10 of which were giant bears and several were just random scorpions I shot for fun. I started Honest Hearts with 600 ammo for my Rifle and ended it with 350 ammo left [didn't find any rifle ammo on my journey through Zion]. It takes me 3 hits to kill most of the units (started the DLC at level 29) and half the time I wasn't in VATS so I missed frequently.

Frankly, having enjoyed Dead Money so much and getting $2 worth of value on a $10 item I've learned my lesson and will have to wait before purchasing the next 2 packs to see reviews from players on length.

......After getting 25 hours worth of time from Fallout IV a $50 game and knowing I still haven't even touched most of its content.....

Am I the only one who caught this?

It's not Fallout 4. It's Fallout: New Vegas. Bethesda is making Fallout 4, not Obsidian. Although, if Obsidian was it'd probable be awesome.

no it's actually the 5th but meh Tactics is controverse and it's not acepted has connon, what is more funny is the 25hours out of FO:NV

there i found the problem some one that plays FO and says that "tactics" is the best FO title, son have you read any of the story surrounding FO:NV or did you just runned doing the main quest? cuse 25 hours is seriouslly i probbly spent more time than that just finding computer logs and finding locations than you did completing the game

I keep seeing this arguement that the story was deep or had depth.

Can someone explain that to me? I'm just curious as to why others think the story for Honest Hearts was deep. The whole thing was just "this tribe is attacking the other one, so get us some stuff so we can leave". There was no first act, and the third act took no more time than 10 minutes or so with no real climix, twist, or anything.

That said, I do think this DLC is worth the 10 dollars.

I keep seeing this arguement that the story was deep or had depth.

Can someone explain that to me? I'm just curious as to why others think the story for Honest Hearts was deep. The whole thing was just "this tribe is attacking the other one, so get us some stuff so we can leave". There was no first act, and the third act took no more time than 10 minutes or so with no real climix, twist, or anything.

That said, I do think this DLC is worth the 10 dollars.

the survivalist story alone is worth at least 3 of does 10$