CNN special on Anonymous

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 3:10 am

HURRRR DURRRRR ANON IS SO COOL I WANNA BE LIKE ANON. Stop it, anonymous is a bunch neckbeards with social problems that can't act like normal people. They are to be shunned and ignored, tripfriends same thing.
more ignorance, you just raging cos they shut down your psn network?
User avatar
Thomas LEON
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:01 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 12:58 am

more ignorance, you just raging cos they shut down your psn network?
Yeah, raging about something I don't have and don't care about. Anon's are a plague, get over it that's what they are. They aren't something to idolize.
User avatar
Marta Wolko
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 6:51 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 11:52 pm

Yeah, raging about something I don't have and don't care about. Anon's are a plague, get over it that's what they are. They aren't something to idolize.
well the real anon (group) could actually be something to idolise, never know. but dont forget that anyone can just hack or whatever then claim it was anonymous. the whole subject is a grey area, but im sure there is great people out there amongst the crowd such as the ones that shut down the paedophile website/ring whatever.
User avatar
Sudah mati ini Keparat
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:14 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 11:59 pm

I'm not neccesarily for or against them, but I do want to know what they'll do next
User avatar
WTW
 
Posts: 3313
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:48 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 6:21 am

I'm not neccesarily for or against them, but I do want to know what they'll do next

Hard to say really i've heard reports that anonymous was decoding that stuxnet worm and successfully made a new malicious program out of it. However, that is dubious news at best since anonymous can be a bunch of liars. Still remember them saying they were going to shut down wallstreet with some saying "that's not us/anonymous it's a splinter group."
User avatar
Sakura Haruno
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:23 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 7:01 pm

Hard to say really i've heard reports that anonymous was decoding that stuxnet worm and successfully made a new malicious program out of it. However, that is dubious news at best since anonymous can be a bunch of liars. Still remember them saying they were going to shut down wallstreet with some saying "that's not us/anonymous it's a splinter group."

Which is a real convenient excuse, if you think about it. It basically says "LOL, We can do whatever we want and you can't do [censored] about it because it wasn't really us!" I lost all respect for anonymous after that little "alliance" of theirs with LulzSec (or, I should say, what little respect I had left). Whatever their intentions may have been, anyone who associates with a group that by all means should be in prison is NOT the good guy.
User avatar
Emily Graham
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:34 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 9:34 pm

Which is a real convenient excuse, if you think about it. It basically says "LOL, We can do whatever we want and you can't do [censored] about it because it wasn't really us!" I lost all respect for anonymous after that little "alliance" of theirs with LulzSec (or, I should say, what little respect I had left). Whatever their intentions may have been, anyone who associates with a group that by all means should be in prison is NOT the good guy.
^^^^^This.
User avatar
Ana Torrecilla Cabeza
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:15 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 5:11 am

Right cause anonymous has done no good /sarcasm.

Remember the whole cat abuse incident? Yeah, anonymous were the ones who stopped the cat from repeatedly getting tortured and the vids getting posted to YouTube. Anonymous saved the cat's life. Yes, anonymous has done good things like that, bad things, and morally gray things (ie stealing a lot of money but giving it to charity). People need to stop being stereotypical and hateful, and realize that not everything is black and white. Everything has a bit of good in them and a bit of bad. Everything.
User avatar
STEVI INQUE
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 9:12 pm

Isn't Anonymous just a bunch of kids crying for attention? :shrug:
User avatar
XPidgex Jefferson
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 4:39 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 8:10 am

Isn't Anonymous just a bunch of kids crying for attention? :shrug:
Please read my last post. Some are. Some are noble people. Some are complete ass-hats. Please don't stereotype, especially with a group like anonymous that consists of basically everybody and anybody imaginable.
User avatar
dean Cutler
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:29 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 6:54 am

Please read my last post. Some are. Some are noble people. Some are complete ass-hats. Please don't stereotype, especially with a group like anonymous that consists of basically everybody and anybody imaginable.

That's exactly the problem. It's that lack of direction that makes them dangerous. Sure, not all of them do all of the stuff we hear on the news, but most don't condemn it either because it's still within the bounds of what they believe. Anonymous is a prime example of why a leaderless, directionless group simply doesn't work.
User avatar
cheryl wright
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:43 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 5:55 pm

Isn't Anonymous just a bunch of kids crying for attention? :shrug:
Yup, and all gamers are socially inept teens who don't have a job.
User avatar
Chrissie Pillinger
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 3:26 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 6:32 am

That's exactly the problem. It's that lack of direction that makes them dangerous. Sure, not all of them do all of the stuff we hear on the news, but most don't condemn it either because it's still within the bounds of what they believe. Anonymous is a prime example of why a leaderless, directionless group simply doesn't work.

Your quote, above, applies to any group of people, even led ones.
User avatar
Blessed DIVA
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:09 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 12:52 am

Your quote, above, applies to any group of people, even led ones.

At least most led groups have some way of keeping a reign on what their members do, keep them from doing stuff that casts the group in a bad light.

Let's make one thing clear, I don't hate a lot of what anonymous does, like Next's example where they caught those guys putting up animal torture vides on youtube. That kind of thing is good. However, I don't like the group itself because they lack any kind of restraint, and that's what comes back to bite them (and a lot of other people who have nothing to do with them for that matter) all the time.
User avatar
Samantha Pattison
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 4:29 am

At least most led groups have some way of keeping a reign on what their members do, keep them from doing stuff that casts the group in a bad light.
what about the bad groups? I mean, there's nothing about organization that makes a group saintly. If anything, organized baddies are often many times worse than leaderless ones.

Let's make one thing clear, I don't hate a lot of what anonymous does, like Next's example where they caught those guys putting up animal torture vides on youtube. That kind of thing is good. However, I don't like the group itself because they lack any kind of restraint, and that's what comes back to bite them (and a lot of other people who have nothing to do with them for that matter) all the time.
At least they do something and stand for their convictions, which is more than I can say about a good many people.
User avatar
Amelia Pritchard
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:40 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 6:47 am

what about the bad groups? I mean, there's nothing about organization that makes a group saintly. If anything, organized baddies are often many times worse than leaderless ones.

All depends on what the group is. If Anonymous is so good, like so many people on this thread are claiming, then a leader to prevent them from doing the bad things can only be a good thing.

At least they do something and stand for their convictions, which is more than I can say about a good many people.

The http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WellIntentionedExtremist: Someone whose goals most people can appreciate, but whose methods are problematic.
User avatar
Dan Stevens
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:00 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 8:10 am

anunymuz is lejun! XDDDD

/b/tards don't deserve much attention from the media. I'd hardly call them "hackers on steroids."
User avatar
Adrian Powers
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:44 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 8:59 pm

anunymuz is lejun! XDDDD

/b/tards don't deserve much attention from the media. I'd hardly call them "hackers on steroids."

*snickers* Script kiddies are the funniest lot out there thinking "O ya, I changed >> to << in this line of coding means i'm a hacker now" which is pathetic. Ran into those idiots all the time in CS which was funny seeing them run around aimbotting people then saying they made the script themselves. Betting there's a chunk of people in anonymous that are just DLing scripts sent to them by the real programmers out there. Heck some probably even let the real hackers hijack their computer letting the person think they are "hacking".
User avatar
kirsty joanne hines
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:06 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 12:56 am

Which is a real convenient excuse, if you think about it. It basically says "LOL, We can do whatever we want and you can't do [censored] about it because it wasn't really us!" I lost all respect for anonymous after that little "alliance" of theirs with LulzSec (or, I should say, what little respect I had left). Whatever their intentions may have been, anyone who associates with a group that by all means should be in prison is NOT the good guy.
This.
User avatar
Rozlyn Robinson
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:25 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 8:43 pm

the OP is really a government decoy trying to flush out anonymous members in all forums possible. oh im just bored now time to shut down PC and get outside :twirl:
User avatar
Ross Zombie
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 2:48 am

At least most led groups have some way of keeping a reign on what their members do, keep them from doing stuff that casts the group in a bad light.
I can easily name several groups that have leaders who either ignored what their members were doing or basically condoned bad things (but I'd be violating several forum rules and probably get myself banned in the process). Leaders do not always have a tight leash on group members - in some cases the opposite is true. The simple presence of a leader does not necessitate that said leader has control over group members, or will even try to intervene or do "the right thing."

Let's make one thing clear, I don't hate a lot of what anonymous does, like Next's example where they caught those guys putting up animal torture vides on youtube. That kind of thing is good. However, I don't like the group itself because they lack any kind of restraint, and that's what comes back to bite them (and a lot of other people who have nothing to do with them for that matter) all the time.
The funny thing is, Anonymous is made up of people - people decide to do the things, both good and bad, that are attributed to Anonymous. They have the same level of restraint that anyone else does - which is to say only the restraints that they place upon themselves.

At least they do something and stand for their convictions, which is more than I can say about a good many people.
This. Very much this.
User avatar
joseluis perez
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 3:09 am

thats a bit ignorant

Because I'm sure they're successful bankers, doctors, lawyers, businessmen etc.

Seriously, I picture a bunch of disgruntled college-age kids, not successful advlts. Until I see actual pictures and bios of them, I'll continue to. I can't help it.
User avatar
michael danso
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 5:06 am

When I think of Anonymous I think of pimply-faced neckbeard basemant dwellers angry at the world and lashing out through their computers. A bunch of people who have zero power or influence in real life, but through their computers they feel powerful and influential.

You've summed up my opinion of Anonymous perfectly.
User avatar
Ernesto Salinas
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:19 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 5:46 pm

Because I'm sure they're successful bankers, doctors, lawyers, businessmen etc.

Seriously, I picture a bunch of disgruntled college-age kids, not successful advlts. Until I see actual pictures and bios of them, I'll continue to. I can't help it.
If you watched the video, you would have seen the face of a very normal person who is a member of anonymous.

I find it hilarious the stereotyping that goes on on this forums for so many things, because it's the exact same stereotyping that so many of you all hate when applied to "gamers"
User avatar
Brentleah Jeffs
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:21 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 8:08 pm

How this came up in the Bethesda forums I'll never know...

Who care's if they're a bunch of pimply-faced d-bags?

This IS the Skyrim forum right? :biggrin:

In a time with legislature such as SOPA trying to pass, Anonymous could not be more relevant.

*Edit*

Coulda swore I was just in the Skyrim forum.
User avatar
LuCY sCoTT
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:29 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games