I could not care less for duel wield.

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:07 pm

holding 2 swords is not badass.. it looks comic booky and will compromise immersion.

I will not use it.
User avatar
Andrew Tarango
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:07 am

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 1:51 am

Good, so immerse yourself not to use it. No one cares...
User avatar
Sabrina Steige
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:51 pm

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:41 am

Good, so immerse yourself not to use it. No one cares...


ZING!
User avatar
ILy- Forver
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:18 am

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 12:50 am

Great, you have an opinion, a problem, and a solution. Why does this thread still exist?
User avatar
noa zarfati
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:54 am

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:54 pm

Good, so immerse yourself not to use it. No one cares...


Pretty much this, they shouldn't just remove it because one guy on the forums said he didn't like it...
User avatar
Adam Porter
 
Posts: 3532
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:47 am

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:24 am

How about a shield and a spell? Or two different spells? It's not just dual wielding swords.
User avatar
sarah simon-rogaume
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:41 am

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:34 am

It's not about caring, it's about having the option of using it (or not). In short, it's about freedom of choice.

Plus, you're pretty wrong if you think dual-wield has never been used in real life. E.g: Sword (ropera) + dagger was is fact pretty common in the XVII's here in Spain.
User avatar
Elea Rossi
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 am

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:40 pm

The assigning skills to hands thing...scares me. I could care less bout DW combat should be focused around sword/spear shield or a two hander.
User avatar
Elena Alina
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:24 am

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:34 pm

Yeah well uh, neener neener! I say thank god they finally came around to giving us dual wield....now if we can only get some info on chopping off some limbs.....
User avatar
Ruben Bernal
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:58 pm

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:51 pm

How about holding two shields?
User avatar
meghan lock
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:26 pm

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 1:42 am

Unlike fast-travel, this is a thing to which I can say, if you don't like it, don't use it. Simply don't dualwield, use 2handed weapons, use a shield, dualwield spells (this is gonna be awesome)
User avatar
naome duncan
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 12:44 am

Yeah, why would anyone want to perform combo attacks and weave 2 spells together?
User avatar
P PoLlo
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:05 am

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:09 am

Can I hold two shields? :D
User avatar
x a million...
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:59 pm

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:31 pm

It sounds interesting to me. The ability to put anything in either hand. Like if I'm a mage that does nothing but magic, why permanently assign a button to blocking with my weak fists? Might as well put another spell there.
User avatar
Bedford White
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:09 am

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:43 am

Can I hold two shields? :D


Im gonna go with no, but it'll be easily modded in. Two sheild-bashes back to back = lmao.
User avatar
Lovingly
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:36 am

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:41 pm

Since shields seem to be way more awesome now, can there be a Captain America total conversion mod?
User avatar
ruCkii
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:08 pm

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:17 pm

Pretty much this, they shouldn't just remove it because one guy on the forums said he didn't like it...

There's a lot of guys on this forum that don't like it :P

But really it's not like they're shoving it down our throats. As far as I'm concerned I like the way that they're implementing it (especially dual wielding spells :drool: )
User avatar
Benjamin Holz
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:34 pm

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:46 am

Dual wielding different spells looks badass.

My 1st character will be a mage just because of that.
User avatar
Honey Suckle
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 5:00 am

There's a lot of guys on this forum that don't like it :P

But really it's not like they're shoving it down our throats. As far as I'm concerned I like the way that they're implementing it (especially dual wielding spells :drool: )


I don't like dual-wielding spells. Please Bethesda remove them :P
User avatar
Stryke Force
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 6:20 am

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:53 am

I don't care too much about holding two melee weapons at the same time, but I do care a lot about the improved mechanics and controls that we'll get because of the two hands being treated seperately. A simple example is using a shield and spell. Normally it would require a melee weapon that would only be there as a filler.

It also gives some more interesting character choices. You can't wield a shield, sword and spell together anymore, so spellsword actually become more vulnerable than shield wearing sorcerers. It also frees up a button to add a shield bash. And it's nice that having both your hands free for spellcasting will give a proper advantage, which encourages mages to keep their hands free instead of using a dagger just for blocking attacks.
User avatar
Marion Geneste
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:21 pm

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:20 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s
:cryvaultboy:
User avatar
Matt Bee
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:32 am

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:54 pm

As long as it is an option, fine by me.
User avatar
Sanctum
 
Posts: 3524
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:29 am

Post » Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:28 pm

What I don't understand is that TES has always been about freedom to be the character you want to be. I don't much like stealth, I don't think it's very heroic. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be in there. People who think duel wielding is stupid do not have to attack with two swords at once.

Additionally, Oblivion is a game where you can become so powerful you jump 10 feet into the air and run significantly faster than a horse - and you're telling me that swinging two swords at once is unrealistic? Personally I'm imagining the spellsword possibilities as we type.
User avatar
Kara Payne
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:47 am

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 3:58 am

Or it is aimed at people who think it is cool. Dual wielding has been in RPGs since 1e D&D. And if you were a Drow from the fiend folio you could dual wield without penalty. Dual wielding has also been in reality, so maybe some people think sword and dagger is cool. They aren't into shields maybe, they don't want a big ass sword, and they don't want the off hand to be sitting there doing nothing. Since your go to response was to insult people, I think more is being said about your maturity than those who want dual wield.
User avatar
Cody Banks
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:30 am

Post » Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:16 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s
:cryvaultboy:


*Heard that. Now just waiting for everybody to realize it's OPTIONAL...*

(sigh)
User avatar
saharen beauty
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:54 am

Next

Return to V - Skyrim

cron