This is embarrassing... this, among other posts shown in this thread, is the representation of modern consumerism? What a joke...need I really explain what's wrong with these statements of complete apathy and anti-criticism and do nothing to assert their point other than stating a lack of care about someone else because this person has their option available to them... even though that defeats the purpose of option and, inherently, the supposed nature of TES series? Must I point out how stepping foot in a cold, somewhat harsh environment doesn't automatically screw up the physical representation of a person's genes? Must I point out the gaping holes in your consumer logic and the seeming incapacity you display in toleration of anyone daring to have a differing view?
To be honest, its representative of your original post as well. Since you seem to class the only options available to non-beast/male characters as "homeless" or "50". As though these are the only two possible outcomes from the character design.
Your free to state you prefer Oblivions character design, but at the same time you fail to grasp that this is Skyrims character design, instead you cast it down as ultimately ugly and offensive to anyone not aged 50 or homeless.
Now when did anyone say that the genes were changed by the environment? There is nothing about the physical features of the characters that age them, there simply isnt. As i said before, it is totally down to the weathered and complexion look that each character has.
Now this is very dependant on racial choice as well, the human races have more weathering than the elves and orcs. The orcs look pretty much perfectly imagined from concept. The elves, look...far more dependant on bone structure, bone structure that can barely be edited, this is something you have to deal with however.
The human ageing is down to the rough look of the skin, dirt, wear and tear
all of which would happen in this environment, especially when you consider the situation you begin in.