Well my Cousin also happens to be my room mate, I am looking at them right now. He lets me use them when ever I want. So I have done more than "Try them on". I don't see cheap or flimsy plastic. WTF do these people you know do with them? They obviously treat them like crap.
What other headphones have you tried for comparison? I've owned and tried several from $10 to $1000, and I felt more confident about my Koss KSC75 clip-ons than I would about Beats.
Headphones due to their very nature are pretty much incapable of reproducing an accurately natural listening experience for us, due to how human hearing works. There are ways to simulate it better through headphones by "leaking" some sound from one channel to the other, but I don't think there are any commercial headphones that actually do that.
Personally I wouldn't inherently trust any products with an audiophile label on them. The audiophile culture is largely based on myths and superstition rather than actual science.
Stereo mixing is built into the majority of recordings. Only old recordings from the 60s and sometimes 70s when stereo was new will have hard panning that sounds unnatural. A lot of recordings today are actually made specifically for headphones, because that's how most people listen. There's also binaural recordings that are considerably more rare, but can definitely recreate a surround sound or speaker effect using headphones.
Good headphones will also be able to pick up subtle spatial cues like reflections, and give more depth to recordings than you would think possible. They actually pick up on these easier than speakers, because speakers have so many other obstacles in their path like room acoustics.
Then there's also HRTF-related programs like Creative's CMSS-3D and Dolby Headphone that can mix channels in certain ways to create depth. I wouldn't use these for music, though.
Not all audiophiles buy into pseudo-science. The headphones themselves ultimately come down to preference and word of mouth because they're so difficult to measure, but I'm not ever going to buy an amp or DAC without measurements and necessity again. I bought a cheap little tube amp once. It sounded nice and all, but I'm sure it butchered the signal. Why pay money for distortion?
Cables are a joke, and not a drop of objective fact suggests they make a difference in any but the most extreme cases.
Have any evidence for that claim?

http://www.machinadynamica.com/
