Mr. House is a android

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:13 am

It's quite obvious that the card labeled "Mr. house" with the picture of a human on it, is him. The securitron is the only robot, and he owns them.


What I want to know is...who's the chick?

Besides we all know that House is Howard Hughes and Andrew Ryan's illegitimate love child cyrogenically frozen to open up years after the Nuclear Holocaust
User avatar
Kevin Jay
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:29 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:24 am

And who is that chinese guy? Are we gonna fight chinese communists too?
User avatar
Nancy RIP
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:42 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:13 am

CHANGE THE TITLE WHAT ARE YOU DOING?!?! "my theory on mr house"
User avatar
yermom
 
Posts: 3323
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 12:56 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:07 am

Same group doesn't mean same species amirite? House can be the odd one out, but there's only one way to find out.


Yup. Dogs, Deathclaws, Robots, and Yao Guai all shard factions with humans in FO3.

I would say a human commanding a robot army, is in fact, in the same faction as his robots.

.02

(He better be human, I want to kill him)
User avatar
Monika Fiolek
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:57 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:15 pm

hes not an android he used cryo stasis and..... you know the old pictures of him..... well what if he was said never to leave the lucky 38 but he did in lets say a armored suit.... im betting for the guy on the front cover could be him just wearing a different suit...
User avatar
adam holden
 
Posts: 3339
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:34 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:06 am

Maybe he's an android goldfish. >_>
User avatar
Sweet Blighty
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:39 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:29 am

NERD RAGE!
User avatar
Marquis T
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:53 am

Him being an adroid or a robot or whatever... is kinda close to being a supercomputer in my opinion. Is this the only type of antagonist that Fallout developers can come up with?
User avatar
Etta Hargrave
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:27 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:06 am

Him being an adroid or a robot or whatever... is kinda close to being a supercomputer in my opinion. Is this the only type of antagonist that Fallout developers can come up with?

Except for Eden and Calculator has there been any more super computer antagonists?

Actually, Calculator was not like Eden either.
Spoiler
Unlike the ZAX computers, it was not an example of real artificial intelligence, but was rather a cyborg, because it was connected with several human brains.


Master
Spoiler
The master was a blob like mutation who most likely lost his vocal cords and used an overseer control chair to talk and control stuff = He's not a super computer


President Richardson
Spoiler
He's human


Frank Horrigan
Spoiler
Super Mutant in power armor


Calvert
Spoiler
Not a super computer, he's still a human, only that he's lost 95% of his body. You wouldn't go and say that someone who's lost an arm is no longer human right? Well, Calvert is still human... Cyborg...


Desmond
Spoiler
A bag of rotten flesh, not a super computer


Alien Leader
Spoiler
He's an alien, not a super computer


Jingwei
Spoiler
A computer program, a simulation character, not a super computer as he does not have free will and only follow the program.


Eden
Spoiler
Super computer


Col Autumn
Spoiler
Human


Wherner
Spoiler
Human


Ashur
Spoiler
Human


These are all the antagonists I could think of.
If I missed someone then feel free to point it out.

[edit]
Found some more.

Victor Presper
Spoiler
Human


Simon Barnaky
Spoiler
First human, then cyborg


Latham "Gammorin"
Spoiler
Human


Jane
Spoiler
Human


Blake
Spoiler
Super mutant sized ghoul

:huh:

Attis
Spoiler
Super mutant, then gigantic blob


Anyway, the point is that saying "Oh great, another super computer antagonist" is just full of fail because there has truly only been one in the fallout universe.
Maybe some of you are talking about non-fallout games that have already done that.
But if we're gonna go on that then every single antagonist in fallout has been unoriginal in appearance, except for the Master.
User avatar
Lucky Boy
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:26 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:57 am



Rambling Aside. Fallout 3 and Tactics used Super Computers as enemies. Fallout 2 had Skynet as a potential enemy. Point is, half of those characters arent even plot essential, just big names in the plot. besides, Fallout 2 was 11 years ago, it isnt as memorable in terms of every detail, unless you play it constantly. Fallout 3 is the most recent, It used alot of robotic plot devices. Any more robot plot twists this time around and I'll rage face.
User avatar
Siobhan Thompson
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:40 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:15 am

Rambling Aside. Fallout 3 and Tactics used Super Computers as enemies. Fallout 2 had Skynet as a potential enemy. Point is, half of those characters arent even plot essential, just big names in the plot. besides, Fallout 2 was 11 years ago, it isnt as memorable in terms of every detail, unless you play it constantly. Fallout 3 is the most recent, It used alot of robotic plot devices. Any more robot plot twists this time around and I'll rage face.


gabrieldan made a good point, but so did you.


rage face
User avatar
Julie Ann
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:17 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:28 pm

gabrieldan made a good point, but so did you.


rage face

Meh. I just can't stand people trying to make it sound like Fallout 1-2 did it right and 3 is nothing. I find all the Fallouts great (except the one I shan't name. :angry: )
User avatar
Tasha Clifford
 
Posts: 3295
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:08 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:26 am

I am just hoping he really is a pre-war man that froze himself. No more robot/super computer twists. I don't want him to be a ghoul, just a pre-war human.
User avatar
Mizz.Jayy
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 5:56 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:36 am

I'd rather see him walking around, or if at best in bed or wheel chair connected to to some life machines due to some cyro-complications. With a protectron butler.

I totally knew that Mr.House would be in the suit of diamonds.
User avatar
Hayley O'Gara
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:53 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:29 am

Meh. I just can't stand people trying to make it sound like Fallout 1-2 did it right and 3 is nothing. I find all the Fallouts great (except the one I shan't name. :angry: )


IMO Fallout 1 and 2 did do it right and Fallout 3 suffered greatly because Bethesda, admittedly, didn't put enough emphasis on their writing. It was a great game but not a great Fallout game.

As I've said countless times though, I'm confident that with Obsidian righting what Fallout 3 did wrong, if Bethesda can expand on the East Coast universe they've created whilst righting whatever it is that Obsidian does wrong with New Vegas....we'll have one hell of a Fallout 4. And then hopefully one hell of another Fallout West Coast game by Obsidian. And then one hell of a Fallout 5. And then.....

Also, be sure to make a ESV in there somewhere. I want to travel to Skyrim, or Hammerfell, or Elsweyr, or Black Marsh, or even back to Morrowind.
Hell especially back to Morrowind. Part of why I love New Vegas so much is revisiting places/people/factions from the previous games. I'd love to see how the Nerevar changed Morrowind.
User avatar
Caroline flitcroft
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:05 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:52 am

He's going to have to wait along time for that. Both Factions are huge and have hundreds of thousands of people. Both Factions control lands that cover entire states.



Unless you have..........http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Repcon!
User avatar
Marquis deVille
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:24 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:54 am

IMO Fallout 1 and 2 did do it right and Fallout 3 suffered greatly because Bethesda, admittedly, didn't put enough emphasis on their writing. It was a great game but not a great Fallout game.

As I've said countless times though, I'm confident that with Obsidian righting what Fallout 3 did wrong, if Bethesda can expand on the East Coast universe they've created whilst righting whatever it is that Obsidian does wrong with New Vegas....we'll have one hell of a Fallout 4. And then hopefully one hell of another Fallout West Coast game by Obsidian. And then one hell of a Fallout 5. And then.....

Also, be sure to make a ESV in there somewhere. I want to travel to Skyrim, or Hammerfell, or Elsweyr, or Black Marsh, or even back to Morrowind.
Hell especially back to Morrowind. Part of why I love New Vegas so much is revisiting places/people/factions from the previous games. I'd love to see how the Nerevar changed Morrowind.

Agreed Ron Perlm- I mean Mr. SmileySmile but I'd rather they go to Valenwood or Black Marsh
User avatar
alyssa ALYSSA
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:36 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:24 am

Rambling Aside. Fallout 3 and Tactics used Super Computers as enemies. Fallout 2 had Skynet as a potential enemy. Point is, half of those characters arent even plot essential, just big names in the plot. besides, Fallout 2 was 11 years ago, it isnt as memorable in terms of every detail, unless you play it constantly. Fallout 3 is the most recent, It used alot of robotic plot devices. Any more robot plot twists this time around and I'll rage face.

An antagonist isn't plot essential?
So... Playing Point Lookout means Calvert and Desmond aren't essential to it's plot?
All of those I listed there are in the main storyline and are part of it. (Maybe not some of the F:BOS one's, haven't played that game).
And skynet isn't plot essential, you could play the whole storyline without encountering him.

I agree that fallout 3 had a lot of robots/cyborgs in it.
But it doesn't mean a robo plot twist can't be good. ;)
It's all about how well written the character is and how it's presented.
User avatar
aisha jamil
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:54 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:12 pm

Meh. I just can't stand people trying to make it sound like Fallout 1-2 did it right and 3 is nothing. I find all the Fallouts great (except the one I shan't name. :angry: )


this
User avatar
Mari martnez Martinez
 
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:39 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:24 am

this


Just to sort of go a bit further with what I think of the mainline Fallout series (1,2, and 3...and NV)

I think Fallout 3 was a great game, but a disappointing Post Apocalyptic RPG. That said as a first step it was pretty good. Bethesda got into the franchise, explored a bit, created some new groups and interesting locations (The Pitt, Point Lookout, Ronto, THE COMMONWEALTH!), and got a good functioning engine. Taking these tools and experience and placing a greater (Morrowind/Fallout like) emphasis on writing can lead to a fantastic game. The type of game that I regret buying because I sink too much time into it.
User avatar
anna ley
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:04 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:11 am

Just to sort of go a bit further with what I think of the mainline Fallout series (1,2, and 3...and NV)

I think Fallout 3 was a great game, but a disappointing Post Apocalyptic RPG. That said as a first step it was pretty good. Bethesda got into the franchise, explored a bit, created some new groups and interesting locations (The Pitt, Point Lookout, Ronto, THE COMMONWEALTH!), and got a good functioning engine. Taking these tools and experience and placing a greater (Morrowind/Fallout like) emphasis on writing can lead to a fantastic game. The type of game that I regret buying because I sink too much time into it.


this too
It just seem as if all the time on here when you read someone reference or mention Fallout 3 all that you find afterwards is criticism and hate,
which is perfectly fine, but seeing it so much without it recieving any sort of commendation is a little deprssing on my part
but I digress
I believe we may have derailed the topic and should probably take this to a different thread
User avatar
Alyna
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:54 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:01 pm

Back on Topic Then...

I still like the whole humanoid robots (replicants!) idea in Fallout games, I just don't want to see them used for M Night Shamalany twists for awhile. I'd be fine with it in a Fallout game that took place in The Commonwealth because that's clearly going to be a huge part of a game set in The Commonwealth....but it doesn't need to be present in every Fallout game...just like The Enclave and the BoS don't have to be ever present.

If these things show up in every game they start to become less special, same way no one really cares about M. Night anymore because they know there will be some "What a tweest!" at some point.
User avatar
loste juliana
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:37 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:03 pm

Heh. Maybe the Mr. House we've seen is just a robot controlled by the real Mr. House who, at this point, is just a brain in a jar. Or something better than a brain in a jar...
User avatar
Zach Hunter
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:26 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:46 am

Heh. Maybe the Mr. House we've seen is just a robot controlled by the real Mr. House who, at this point, is just a brain in a jar. Or something better than a brain in a jar...

A goldfish in a Jar? DAMN IT! GABRIEL IS MR. HOUSE. :bonk:
User avatar
Rebecca Clare Smith
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:13 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:57 pm

A goldfish in a Jar? DAMN IT! GABRIEL IS MR. HOUSE. :bonk:

Yes.
Yes I am. :disguise:
User avatar
Cat
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:10 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas