» Fri May 27, 2011 11:40 am
First one has to define what is life. This might stretch us to long philosophical discussion so let us supposed alien life is a self replicant, able to evolve and self-sustainable chemical process (what is called metabolism).
Some biologists are still arguing to know whether metabolism or self replication came first... Metabolism needs proteins, self replication need nucleo-acid.
To have life on another planet is more than likely. I think it is a question of few years before we will be able to observe it. However, the public will probably be very deceived.
Now, if you observe the bulk of 'life' on earth, it is mainly bacteria. With the discovery of nanobacteria and the nanobe (this is a very strange hypothetical form of life living within rocks), this is more than likely than an alien form of life will tend to be microscopic.
Regarding a larger type of life, it is very difficult to predict what could be found
I don't believe that any form of living will be like on earth. The multiplication of coincidences in evolution tree to bring a fish, a tree, a bird, a mushroom or a human to have this shape is so big that there are no chance at all to get something like us, even nearer...
Intelligent life ? Yes, as intelligence is a way to adapt to a quick changing environement, like a salmon or a lizard are 'intelligent'. But do life really need an intelligence like human ? Or are we an abnormality of evolution, a crazy accident, a curiosity ? I just would like to remind you something.
About 1.7 millions years ago, the human from that time, Homo Erectus/Ergaster, invented a beautiful tool called the acheulean hand axe. It was a very good tool, symmetrical and beautifully shaped.
From 1.7 millions years ago to 100 000 years ago, this tool has been used. NO BLOODY CULTURAL CHANGE, NO CULTURAL EVOLUTION. Just acheulean hand axe...
Imagine what the Acheulean Hand Axe Co. plc must have been doing !!! "Oh Darling, I got a promotion yesterday ! Guess what I got ! An hand axe !"
Meanwhile, the cranial capacity of the human went from around 900 cc to 1700 cc, from the Homo Ergaster to the first Homo Sapiens. There was no correlation between the size of the brain and the evolution of culture. The 'machiavelian' school said that most of the capacity of the brain was used for social interaction, plotting coup and lies, organizing clans and wars etc...It was what is called the "Big Stagnation".
Then suddenly, there was a boom. Somewhere, in East Africa, probably a micro-mutation on the DNA involved in the brain development which causes a big change and made humans to look for trouble, look for 'civilization', start arts and develop technology. First necklace : 70 000 years ago, first painting in South Africa, 120 000 years ago, a necklace of shell in South Africa as well. It was gradual and then it widespread in Europe.
So all I want to say with that is that intelligence does not automatically mean complex culture, tools (see dolphins) etc... We have to really think out of the box when imagining an alien form of life. Intelligence of human is only one way for life to adapt. There are other forms of society than the western technological society, other form of intelligence, other form of adaptation etc...