Man i am in shock : Othor Games

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:00 pm

He said that too? I thought that was only Jonahirt.
OP: Well you were kind of mean but at least you weren't mean "just" because she was addicted. She did something to provoke your angst and only then did you react with hostility (I think). Anyway, it's sad how people get addicted to this stuff.
EDIT: TBH, there's nothing wrong with being mad at someone who steals from you, furthermore it's not like you killed her.

He unintentionally shamed himself by showing profound ignorance. Jonahirt = pure ignorance.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:40 pm

No, you shouldn't feel bad. Your being mean has nothing to do with her death. She stole from you. You SHOULD be mean to people who do that. Smiling and thanking someone who steals from you is stupid and ignoring it is naive.

Smiling and thanking someone who steals from you is not the only alternative to being mean to them.

I don't know the situation or the relationship between them previously, or what she stole, or whatever, but it's not always so black and white.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:20 pm

He unintentionally shamed himself by showing profound ignorance. Jonahirt = pure ignorance.

Woo I'm like famous, people throwing my name around left and right these days. :foodndrink:

» Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:01 am

You shouldn't feel bad she died, sad, I guess, but not because you were rude to her, simply because this is someone with a family.
You are in no way responsible or accountable for her death.
Some of these responses make me wonder what I;ve missed, since when was the forum n a witch hunt for Silver Eagle? :lol:

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:11 pm

It is most certainly not human nature.

well he's human, and it's a logical outcome of him being pissed about getting robbed. But yeah he probably should have let that go after the rescue of a puppy.

But don't feel to regretful OP, you dont know the future.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 12:52 pm

No, you shouldn't feel bad. Your being mean has nothing to do with her death. She stole from you. You SHOULD be mean to people who do that. Smiling and thanking someone who steals from you is stupid and ignoring it is naive.

No one would smile and ignore someone stealing from them. Of course if someone keeps stealing from you then you're gonna dislike and not hang around them. But you're trying justify being a dike to someone because they stole from you and then they never did it again, then they saved your puppy.

Of course he's shouldn't feel guilty that she died. But he feels guilty because there were things he wanted to say to her, but he can't now because she's dead.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 12:10 pm

Thirded.

Just out of curiosity from your post saying drug addicts should be shot (or words to that effect) do you consider those addicted to legal drugs such as alcohol and tobacco to be 'drug addicts'? (as in worthy of death in your eyes)

If not, why not?

If it's a matter of legality, what about someone who is a 'drug addict' where their drug of choosing is legal, are they still 'drug addicts' in the sense that you want them shot? Which jurisdiction applies?

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:32 am

There is a difference between intentional ignorance and true ignorance. Do not be deceived by them. As for her fate, she incurred it upon herself. No one but her is responsible for her actions. One must understand this..

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:20 pm

Thats sad, You should savor everyone you meet, Once I played Nazi Zombies with a friend of my dads best friend, he was 19, we had alot of fun, few months later he suffered a coma, a few weeks later he died, it was cancer. When I was at his funeral his mother broke down in tears, I didn't cry. and kept a blank face,

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:23 am

Just out of curiosity from your post saying drug addicts should be shot (or words to that effect) do you consider those addicted to legal drugs such as alcohol and tobacco to be 'drug addicts'? (as in worthy of death in your eyes)

If not, why not?

If it's a matter of legality, what about someone who is a 'drug addict' where their drug of choosing is legal, are they still 'drug addicts' in the sense that you want them shot? Which jurisdiction applies?

How about, let's stay on topic and let it go. Who really cares what I think one way or another.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:16 pm

Just out of curiosity from your post saying drug addicts should be shot (or words to that effect) do you consider those addicted to legal drugs such as alcohol and tobacco to be 'drug addicts'? (as in worthy of death in your eyes)

If not, why not?

If it's a matter of legality, what about someone who is a 'drug addict' where their drug of choosing is legal, are they still 'drug addicts' in the sense that you want them shot? Which jurisdiction applies?

This can't go anywhere good...

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:21 pm

This can't go anywhere good...

Neither did that other thread.
Now it is time for the savvy, pipe-smoking hussar to watch...and wait...for the moment to strike.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 12:58 pm

This can't go anywhere good...

I don't see why it shouldn't. Have I been unintentionally rude or something? Reading my post back it seems okay.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:03 pm

How about, let's stay on topic and let it go. Who really cares what I think one way or another.

And that's what we call dodging a logical question. If you did answer it your lack of understanding would shame you yet again.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:08 am

No one would smile and ignore someone stealing from them. Of course if someone keeps stealing from you then you're gonna dislike and not hang around them. But you're trying justify being a dike to someone because they stole from you and then they never did it again, then they saved your puppy.

Talking to them is better, especially since he knew her beforehand and she was his neighbor.

» Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:46 am

Neither did that other thread.

The ruling of world thread?

I don't see why it shouldn't. Have I been unintentionally rude or something? Reading my post back it seems okay.

It's off topic and should really be discussed in PM'S.

And that's what we call dodging a logical question. If you did answer it your lack of understanding would shame you yet again.

Once again. PM's.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:48 pm

And that's what we call dodging a logical question. If you did answer it your lack of understanding would shame you yet again.

Or he's just trying to adhere to the forum rules... You could inbox him the question so this thread can help out SilverEagle instead of bashing someone else's opinions.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:35 pm

And that's what we call dodging a logical question. If you did answer it your lack of understanding would shame you yet again.

I'd say erring on the side of caution is the best policy, if I remember correctly the last time the topic got brought up the thread was locked, making this a covert attempt at restarting the topic.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:53 pm

Don't feel bad. The situation she was in had nothing to do with you, and she violated your trust by stealing your property so it's perfectly understandable that you were upset with her. Only you can decide if what you said or did crossed the line, and if you think it did then use this as a learning experience for the future.

She seems to have had a sad life, but none of it was your fault.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:37 am

Ignoring it isn't really the best course of action. Talking to them is better, especially since he knew her beforehand and she was his neighbor.

Well that's probably why he feels bad, because he wanted to confront her.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:36 am

I'd say erring on the side of caution is the best policy, if I remember correctly the last time the topic got brought up the thread was locked, making this a covert attempt at restarting the topic.

Awwww yeah! :devil:

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:45 pm

Or he's just trying to adhere to the forum rules... You could inbox him the question so this thread can help out SilverEagle instead of bashing someone else's opinions.

YEP COZ KWESTCHUNS IS BASHINK SUMFINK

» Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:04 am

Ignoring it isn't really the best course of action. Talking to them is better, especially since he knew her beforehand and she was his neighbor.

It depends, I haven't known my neighbours in every place I've lived. And if you know they are a drug addict and are addicted enough to steal talking to them is not a good course of action.

Me and my buddies once tried to have an intervention with one of my friends due to drug use, it didn't end well. The best course of action is really to notify police.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:00 pm

I'd say erring on the side of caution is the best policy, if I remember correctly the last time the topic got brought up the thread was locked, making this a covert attempt at restarting the topic.

I know.

But he just pours out his ignorance and then once asked to back up what he said, he does not answer and dodges the question. Or states the obvious facts of things without answering his irrational opinions.

» Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:02 pm

I seriously think you might be the most interesting man in the world.

But to be on topic, I do not think you should feel bad about it. I doubt that she was holding any grudges toward you or anything because of it. It wasn't the nicest thing to do by being mean to her, but it is not something that you should be beating yourself up about. It isn't like you knew she was going to die, you were just reacting in a way that you thought was normal at the time. Nothing can be done about it, live and learn.