No, because it would probably mean that I could be "hacked", since I would probably be connected to the internet or something similar.
If, however, I could be sure I couldn't be controlled like a machine (doesn't "robot" mean servant originally?), then yes, why not.
Hate to be the bearer of bad news but you already can be hacked. In fact it's easier to hack a human than hack a computer. It's why social engineering is so effective. Humans have a really bad buffer overflow problem.
This entire thread presupposes the idea that being a cyborg and human are mutually exclusive. Are you suggesting that people with artificial hearts, synthetic joints, prosthetic limbs, etc, are somehow "less" than human? Obviously they are not, and if this is the case, where does the line get drawn between human/cyborg? I don't think there is such a distinction at all. Ergo, I see no conflict.
QFT. There are already cyborgs among us, they just have a little more flesh than the OP proposes