Robo-pony

haha Lot's of Hate towards the BoS

Hawaii would seem like a cool place to set the next game

I think your talking about the Enclave, there practically dead. The BOS are on there way to extinction if they don't wise up.

Maybe some samurai looking power armour faction with some tesla katanas

Something like this?

http://www.elfwood.com/art/d/a/david/high_tech_ninja.jpg

Oh yeeeaaaa, Yes, I would like to have a BOS dlc for FO:nv. And I would be upset if the BOS did not make it into the next FO game, they are not just 'cool', and they are not dying, they are struggling from within as well as outside the BH. The BOS represent a side of all human-beings that would come out in all of us in a post apocalypse.

But like has been said a couple of times already, I don't want them placed in the game just "because", I want them to be properly incorporated into the story; and if not the main story, have them incorporated into the side quests, story, history, surroundings, relevant politics, trade, war, and whatnot.... The BOS can evolve into an awesome addition to the FO universe, not just a "cool" looking armor like they somewhat turned into recently.

Where were there bos in oa?

There was 3 fo games on the west coast. What makes you think they wouldn t have more than one somewhere else? They do that to continue story lines. Fo tactics has waited long enough. We need to know about what is going down in middle America

Outcasts, despite the name change, are still BOS at heart.
They're considered a rouge faction by Lyons Brotherhood when it is in fact "they" who are the rouge faction.
So even if there's a name change they're still BOS, and even though Lyons Brotherhood has defected from their original purpose they are still considered BOS.
So O:A: Outcasts.
Pitt: Ashur and BOS purge.
BS: Well...

OK I ll give you oa, but Asher is not longer an agent of bos. He is the ruler of The Pitt.

and THEY DON T JUST SURVIVE.........THEY THRIVE!!!!!

Doesn't matter.
He's still former BOS, just like Outcast were, just like Elijah were.
What I'm talking about is that BOS has already had enough presence in almost everything.
They do not need anything more.

Lyons Brotherhood and the Outcasts need at least one more game in the east coast to tie their story up.
And west coast might need one more game where they're like the Remnants in Vegas.
And then we need another Tactics game.

Other than that I see no reason to include BOS as they're not a necessity for a Fallout game.

One thing that needs to be remembered is that the BoS are all descended from the personel of a SINGLE military base and that the base itself wasn't all that large to begin with. So it stands to reason that their numbers are relatively limited.
Another point to bear in mind is that by the time of Fallout 2 they were in decline and had one maybe two people in their outlying outposts.

Gabriel, the BoS also featured in the Burned Game as well.

As for a BoS 'army' if it's on the West Coast there is no chance what so ever that there will be a BoS army as they do not have enough personell to field one. If it's in the Mid West, they may have enough personel to field a small army as they were recruiting as they went, plus depending on which ending of Tactics is decided to be cannon they could have their numbers increased with robotic personel. If it's set on the East Coast, then even though they are recruiting they don't have enough fully trained personel to field an army.

I dunno what you're talking about, there's no such thing as a "burned game", only 5 Fallout titles exist.

They've had three Fallout games set in the west yes, but they were all set in different parts of the west.

I'd take a Brotherhood DLC if took a page from Bioware's Dragon Age and focused on the past, or even a single character (akin to Leliana's Song.) It could focus on it's formation just after the bombs fell, which could also make for a way to write more about eh prewar US and how it stood. Or it could focus on Lyons' trek across the midwest, with a game focusing on the aspects of love and loss, fracturing loyalties from the strain of long range deployment, ect.

I'd prefer a character driven DLC. Not one where the player meets the character in question, by plays as him/him (again, Leliana's Song is the perfect reference.) There's a bevy of choices, from directly postwar Maxson setting up the original BoS to McNamara rising through the ranks and having to take over as elder in battle, to Sarah Lyons growing up as part of a detached warrior order under siege and becoming one of the best warriors around.

I'll mention Bioware's DLC again by paraphrasing the main character that set the tone from the whole DLC "I know how the beginning and the end go, but not the middle. I'll let you help me tell the story, and if I like it enough, that's how I'll tell it."

I'd i agree with you and i wish more people would state these thoughts the way you did AS AN OPINION and not a fact like they are the lords of fallout or something. And if you see this post and start getting irrate cuase your one of those people no i dont care what cannon lore says humans are humans and do what they; im talking about the devs, want unless they are forced into doing something else by some means.

Oh man, after being in every game and their IMMENSE presence in Fo3 and still being in NV with another DLC revolving around them there is STILL a demand for more? They're the most overused faction in fallout at this point...idk about you guys but having hundreds of guys in high tech armor with energy weapons running around kind of kills the wasteland feeling. NV portrayed them well, it makes you appreciate them more when they're low in numbers.