Skyrim PC version is unfinished

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 11:26 am

This is the exact reason why I'm not buying Skyrim for a while. If I hear some extremely good things about it or a patch comes that sorts everything out I'll buy it on the spot. If not, then I'll wait until a deal on Steam comes up.
User avatar
Greg Cavaliere
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:31 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 9:48 am

This is the exact reason why I'm not buying Skyrim for a while. If I hear some extremely good things about it or a patch comes that sorts everything out I'll buy it on the spot. If not, then I'll wait until a deal on Steam comes up.
Seriously. In a month or two this game will be amazing. Well worth the additional wait.
User avatar
Genevieve
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:22 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 6:17 pm

Have you tried editing the .ini file? :wink_smile:
User avatar
Kara Payne
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:47 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 6:05 pm

Are you guys freaking serious? This isn't about personal preference. This is about the BARE MINIMUM that a SIXTY DOLLAR AAA premium game should have. Graphics options SHOULD BE IN THE GAME. Saying "you can just mod it out" is WRONG. I shouldn't have to fix a multi MILLION dollar company's mistakes. And anyone who says otherwise is a deluded zealot.

The game isn't fine. It isn't all hunky dorry. These issues exist. They are real. if you don't mind them, cool. Many of us do. Many of us expected better for such a high price tag. Maybe if they'd taken the 1 million dollars they invested into those moronic statues or food trucks and put it into the PC version we wouldn't have these issues?

As of now, with the mouse problems, the game is absolutely unplayable for me.

I have yet to see truer words spoken on these forums. Your first paragraph is very inspirational.
User avatar
Matthew Barrows
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:24 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 6:54 pm

'BARE MINIMUM'? lol..just lol. Loads of dungeons, quests, giant landscape, tall mountains, the list goes on, is the bare minimum? wow my parents brought me up to be really really grateful.



Grateful about what? I payed more for this game than any other PC game I've bought in the last year, yet all the PC centric options are WORSE than those cheaper games. Something's wrong with the equation. The day I'm grateful for shoddy UI, controls, and graphics options, is the day I get lobotomized into a Bethesda zealot like you. We payed more, we should get more. The PC version was an afterthought, and I'm letting everyone know that.

As for the game itself, that's not what this thread is about, so don't bring that into things. The stuff I mentioned directly detracts from my overall gameplay experience. Especially the mouse issues and the compass.
User avatar
Cool Man Sam
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 1:19 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 8:59 am

To the people that say that there is no reason to complain, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about. Any good game nowadays has these simple things fixed. It's blatantly obvious how bad of a port this is. How hard can it be to implement a couple of simple things such as Vertical Sync options, proper X and Y axis for the mouse, proper Field of View, etc.? Really? Maybe half a day of programming if not less? It's obvious that they did not spend ANY time whatsoever testing this game for the PC. Just take a look at the PC section where dozens of people were complaining about sound issues in general and the game crashing at launch. Do you really think that they would not have noticed that if they even tested a couple of different computer setups? Honestly? That's just naieve and stupid. Like the OP said, an AAA-game from a multi-million dollar company should NOT have these small issues. These things aren't even things that should be implemented later with patches, simply because they are so simple to fix. I can't even comprehend how they let this happen...

Add: I can live with all the small mistakes I ran into. Small mistakes in quests, a bug here and there, a couple of typos in books I read...it's a huge game, of course there are going to be game-related bugs, but saying that the reason it's this big is a reason not to complain about the things listed above is ignorant.
User avatar
Tikarma Vodicka-McPherson
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:15 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 10:07 pm

I'm completely serious, if you don't like the game, you shouldn't have bought it. They can't include options for everything, stop being lazy and sort the problem out yourself.
How would he know if he didn't like the game unless he bought it?

You make absolutely no logical sense...
User avatar
Charity Hughes
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:22 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 1:48 pm

How would he know if he didn't like the game unless he bought it?

You make absolutely no logical sense...

If he'd waited a while he would have seen these threads and then made his own decision about whether to buy it or not.
User avatar
Chantelle Walker
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:56 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 1:40 pm

It's funny how he talks of everyone who disagrees with him as being a brain dead zealot, but he seems to be the one irrationally frothing at the mouth over minor issues.
User avatar
Sun of Sammy
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:38 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 10:24 am

How do I edit this ".ini file" everyone is talking about? And you're right the PC version was pretty much neglected like a redheaded stepchild.

I am a redhead and am very offended by this remark, however I am on the darkside so...
User avatar
Jessica Phoenix
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:49 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 8:39 am

Seeing that the ini settings ARE the game settings themselves, then there's not really an issue is there? I mean c'mon, I can understand if you were on the 360/PS3, but I do agree that $60 is a bit steep, however, back when all we had was snes, you had to pay $70-$90! FF3 (6 in japan) was $89-F****n' dollars and Phantasy star IV was a whompin' $100!! It's natural that a software company would keep their prices on par via cross-platform, and if money's the issue, you could've easilly waited for the game to depreciate a bit, as PC games are known to do...MUCH more than consoles, as there are 16-bit games right now that command a 3 digit price tag!
User avatar
Shaylee Shaw
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:55 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 11:44 am

disagree with the unfinished..
its a console game,and whats there is all a console gamer wants.

beth is dipping its snout into the console trough,simple as that.

right now they are working on dlc,and leaving it to the modders to fix the pc version.
we are the wife whos passed 40,they wanna a divorce so they can hook up with a younger model ;)
User avatar
sarah taylor
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:36 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 4:59 pm

If he'd waited a while he would have seen these threads and then made his own decision about whether to buy it or not.
A decision based on hearsay is not "his" decision. Similarly, he is entitled to an opinion, and telling him to be smarter and figure it out is nigh useless. Yes, you are entitled to an opinion as well, but that doesn't mean you spout illogical nonsense and blame others at every opportunity. Tone it down.
User avatar
Laura Shipley
 
Posts: 3564
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:47 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 12:13 pm

Shouldn't this thread be in the PC issue section?

Anyway my preordered PC copy is on backorder - so I'm left to playing the PS3 copy I have which works fine - (my PC copy is for modding)

So doesn't the PC version have video settings? Isn't that the same issue Rage had?
User avatar
Carlos Vazquez
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:19 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 10:35 pm

If he'd waited a while he would have seen these threads and then made his own decision about whether to buy it or not.

Hence why I created this thread, but you conveniently ignored my other post that told you that.


It's funny how he talks of everyone who disagrees with him as being a brain dead zealot, but he seems to be the one irrationally frothing at the mouth over minor issues.


I'm not saying that about anyone disagreeing with me. I'm saying that about the people who are telling me that I should fix these myself and that Bethesda did nothing wrong. But, hey, zealots cannot see past their blinding love I guess.
User avatar
christelle047
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:50 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 1:54 pm

Why is anyone even on these forums if they are totally happy with the game, why aren't you playing it???
Because I'm going to go pick it up for the xbox in about 10 minutes. :D
User avatar
Elena Alina
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:24 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 10:57 pm

Seriously. In a month or two this game will be amazing. Well worth the additional wait.
After Fallout New Vegas, I swore to myself that I would never again get a PC game on the first day of release. I'm not going to wait years until something like Borderlands for $7.50 or every GTA game for $13 happens to Skyrim. I'm just going to sit back, play Oblivion, wait for the defining patch and listen to everyone's opinion.
User avatar
Melly Angelic
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 11:18 am

disagree with the unfinished..
its a console game,and whats there is all a console gamer wants.

beth is dipping its snout into the console trough,simple as that.

right now they are working on dlc,and leaving it to the modders to fix the pc version.
we are the wife whos passed 40,they wanna a divorce so they can hook up with a younger model ;)

While I agree, we're not allowed to talk about that, my last thread got closed for it. We can't mention consoles as a cause or anything. Hence why I said "unfinished", which, it is. Between the bugs, the UI, the controls, and the graphics options, it's very clear this game is not done yet on the PC.
User avatar
helen buchan
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:17 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 9:21 am

console games are for re***ds and no I wont buy skyrim even thou I owe all the predecessors
User avatar
mollypop
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:47 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 10:28 am

What is wrong with the compass?
User avatar
Enny Labinjo
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:04 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 6:57 pm

I'm not saying that about anyone disagreeing with me. I'm saying that about the people who are telling me that I should fix these myself and that Bethesda did nothing wrong. But, hey, zealots cannot see past their blinding love I guess.

ummm yes you are, I disagreed with your comment about Skyrim being the bare minimum and agreed with your mouse problems...yet you irrationally called me a blind zealot.
User avatar
Becky Palmer
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:43 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 8:08 am

*** Looks back several years to when Oblivion was first released ***

Same sorts of things were said back then, and yet many years of PC bliss were had...

*** Looks even further back to when Morrowinf was released ***

Same sorts of complaints about interfaces were made back then as well...

Nothing new to see here...
User avatar
Greg Swan
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 12:49 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 1:24 pm

I'm not saying that about anyone disagreeing with me. I'm saying that about the people who are telling me that I should fix these myself and that Bethesda did nothing wrong. But, hey, zealots cannot see past their blinding love I guess.

Bethesda did do something wrong. They should have included these in the options menu, but they didn't, I understand that. My question is, do you really think that's a problem serious enough for you to suggest that people don't buy this game?
User avatar
Lovingly
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:36 am

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 10:17 am

I'm not saying that about anyone disagreeing with me. I'm saying that about the people who are telling me that I should fix these myself and that Bethesda did nothing wrong. But, hey, zealots cannot see past their blinding love I guess.

I don't see anyone saying that Bethesda did nothing wrong. It seems you're just mad because some people are capable of finding the game great despite it's fault, like we all have to do with everything else in life.
User avatar
Teghan Harris
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:31 pm

Post » Wed May 09, 2012 8:00 pm

So far I'm having a ton of fun! The graphics options are fine in my opinion, I adjusted the mouse look sensitivity and learned to not use the mouse to navigate menus in the first 3 mins.

Nothing the op states is game breaking. Imo.
User avatar
Princess Johnson
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:44 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim