Unofficial "Will My PC Run Skyrim" Thread #56 w hard

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 1:25 pm

Welcome to the forums, have a fishy stick :smile:
Thanks, but I don't like fishy sticks. You may have mine :smile:

The main parts of your computer look OK for medium settings. Your weak point in Skyrim is the CPU - Skyrim is unusual in being very CPU-limited, especially in cities. Outside of cities you will have a pretty good experience on medium.
I guess I'll just have to try it out then, won't I? I could of course borrow the game from a friend, and see how it runs, and then decide.
Otherwise, I might just have to play Oblivion or Fallout3 again, to cope with my cravings. :smile:
User avatar
Sara Lee
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:40 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 5:40 pm

Borrowing the game isn't possible unfortunately unless you also borrow your friends steam account. But yes, playing Oblivion or Fallout 3 again is always a good thing :) Though I'm pretty certain Skyrim will run fine on your computer.
User avatar
Budgie
 
Posts: 3518
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:26 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 11:56 pm

Way back, before Oblivion, some time in the Morrowind popularity period, a member here greeted new arrivals with the Fishy Stick ritual. Others have picked it up, although it's not seen too often lately.

The official system requirements were inaccurate. Although it is possible for a PC with a really good graphics card to run fairly well indoors, including in dungeons, and only have a CPU running 2.0 GHz, generally speaking your C2D's speed is running at about the actual, practical minimum.
User avatar
StunnaLiike FiiFii
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:30 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 10:27 pm

Borrowing the game isn't possible unfortunately unless you also borrow your friends steam account. But yes, playing Oblivion or Fallout 3 again is always a good thing :smile: Though I'm pretty certain Skyrim will run fine on your computer.

That, I didn't know. But I suppose that's a bit much trouble and inconvenience for a friend.
Thanks for your answers anyways, I guess I'll just to make a leap of faith. I'm positive the benefits is well worth the risk.

"M'aiq wishes he had a stick made out of fishies [sic] to give to you. Sadly, he does not."
User avatar
lucile
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:37 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 6:14 pm

Would this run it?

AMD A6-3650 quad-core processor [2.6GHz, 4MB L2 Cache]
6GB DDR3-1333MHz SDRAM
1GB DDR3 Radeon HD 6450
User avatar
Tiff Clark
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:23 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 3:33 pm

Would this run it?

AMD A6-3650 quad-core processor [2.6GHz, 4MB L2 Cache]
6GB DDR3-1333MHz SDRAM
1GB DDR3 Radeon HD 6450

"Yes, BUT !" The graphics are just very weak/ slow, and you'll have to dial the screen resolution down. You may be disappointed.

(ADDED in Edit) P. S. Are you sure it doesn't tell you that it works in tandem with a 6320 that's in the processor and between them they are a little better, like a "6510" or something?
User avatar
Jeff Turner
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:35 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 4:18 am

Hmm, okay. Thanks for the answers Gorath and Kalniel. :)

I'm considering to get a new computer now. My budget would be less than $1000-$1500 or so.
I may have to find individual parts and ask a shopkeeper to help me fix because I noticed most brands online shop PCs' graphic cards are not listed for the max setting.

I'm considering to get this parts:
- Processor: Intercore i5 processor
- Memory: 8GB ram (just to be safe..)
- Graphic Card: Sapphire HD 6950
- 500GB space

I've little knowledge so I want to know the difference between:
- i5, i7, amd and quad-duo. Which one is better for skyrim and any other games? How are they ranked?
- Sapphire HD 6950. I saw Radeon 6950 in the list but not Sapphire. Are the both the same card or different?

Can this pc be played on max setting + mods without lags in maps and towns?
User avatar
Brittany Abner
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 1:35 pm

There are many different i5 processors, many different i7s, many different i3s. An i3 is the latest C2D iteration, more or less, with two processing cores, plus inside the package with them is an Intel HD 3000 video chip.

http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/386100/what_difference_between_an_intel_core_i3_i5_i7_/

i5s are supposed to have four processing cores, although according to the PC World article, one of them only has two.

i7s are also four cores, but are of a greatly improved version. I haven't been keeping up with AMD's processors quite as well as I suppose I should, and can't offer much in the way about any of them other than their APUs, which really have my attention.

Almost no games really put more than two cores to good use, however, within the lifetime of a current PC build, that will be changing.
User avatar
Shelby Huffman
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:06 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 2:42 pm

Hmm, okay. Thanks for the answers Gorath and Kalniel. :smile:

I'm considering to get a new computer now. My budget would be less than $1000-$1500 or so.
I may have to find individual parts and ask a shopkeeper to help me fix because I noticed most brands online shop PCs' graphic cards are not listed for the max setting.

I'm considering to get this parts:
- Processor: Intercore i5 processor
- Memory: 8GB ram (just to be safe..)
- Graphic Card: Sapphire HD 6950
- 500GB space

I've little knowledge so I want to know the difference between:
- i5, i7, amd and quad-duo. Which one is better for skyrim and any other games? How are they ranked?
- Sapphire HD 6950. I saw Radeon 6950 in the list but not Sapphire. Are the both the same card or different?

Can this pc be played on max setting + mods without lags in maps and towns?

To answer the ultimate question: No. Or at least, not really.

Unfortunately Skyrim is very dependant on CPU power, in particular single-threaded performance. That means the number of cores (above 2) is largely irrelevant, but clockspeed (and how much each chip can do per clock tick) are important. That last bit (how much they can do per tick) is a bit of a gotcha for AMD CPUs at the moment - they have focused on multi-threaded performance, which is what other games and applications are beginning to use, but it's come at the expense of power per tick in single-threaded performance. So as much as AMD are excellent CPUs, for Skyrim the best performance can be found with Intel chips.

Once you've gone for Intel there are several series' of chips to consider, and Intel don't help with their numbering! At the moment the chips that perform best for the money in Intel are the Core i3, i5 and i7 Sandybridge chips (socket 1155). Intel calls these 2nd Generation Core i3/i5/7 Processors. i7 processors are a little more expensive, have a little more cache, have a bit higher clockspeed and either have more cores or enable hyperthreading compared to i5 chips.

In short for the normal (excluding low power variants) desktop chips:
i3 = 2 cores + 2 hyperthreaded cores
i5 = 4 cores, no hyperthreading
i7 = 4 cores + 4 hyperthreaded cores

We've already said cores (and thus hyperthreaded cores) aren't important to Skyrim, but the cache and slight clockspeed improvements could be useful, however IMHO it's not worth the increase in premium over an i5, especially if you consider overclocking. So I'll concentrate on the i5 family.

Which intel describe here:
http://ark.intel.com/products/family/59134/2nd-Generation-Intel-Core-i5-Processors/desktop

As you can see there's still quite a lot of choice. In general, the higher the number, the better the performance. The letters after the name represent special features relevant to a particular target audience - T is ultra low power, S is low power, K is enthusiast. And no letter is the normal version. It's unlikely you are interested in low-power versions so the choice is between the normal and the K version. Put simply: the K version allows very simple overclocking - really it's a breeze! Underneath the model names you can see the base clockspeed.. but one of the neat tricks of the core i5 chip (and i7) is that this is only a base speed - when there is spare headroom in the chip (when you aren't maxing out all the cores for eg.) the chip turbos up to much faster frequencies - these are the frequencies that are going to be used when playing Skyrim, so the base speeds are kind of useless and should be ignored, you have to click on the chip to see the max turbo frequency. Core i3 chips are great value for money, and work great for games as well, but can't turbo - but they might be running faster than a low end i5 can turbo to! See the ranking below for example.

So that's a long winded way of saying ideally go for an i5 2500K processor, along with a motherboard that allows easy overclocking (p67 or z68 based), and adding a nicer cooler for the CPU will also help. If you don't want to overclock then look for the chip that has the highest turbo frequency that you can afford.

So an effective ranking for Skyrim would be
(happy to overclock, best first):
i7-2700k
i7-2600k
i5-2500k (turbo speed 3.7ghz, but can overclock to 4+ghz easily)
i7-2600
i5-2500 (turbo speed 3.7ghz)
i5-2400
i3-2130 (clock speed 3.4ghz)
i3-2125
i5-2320
i3-2120
i5-2310
i5-2300
i3-2100

If you're not happy to overclock then the i5-2500k is in the same place as the non-K version. I've highlighted 3 value for money ones. Even the i3 chips have dual core + hyperthreading, so they're great for games as they are rarely very well threaded. If you have other applications that are very threaded though (like video encoding etc.) the i5s that have four real cores like the 2500 will be faster.

Graphics!

The 6950 is a great card.. though in a month new cards from AMD are coming out that might lower the price. All 6950s are the same chip, but different end manufacturers might use different coolers and include extras in the package. Check which one provides the best warranty where you are for example. Sapphire are a fine make, so are just about all of them to be honest - I have a powercolor and it's been fantastic, I've had sapphire, Asus, MSI, leadtek in the past. The only make I would personally be cautious with is XFX, but I'm sure others would recommend them.

But back to that question - with an i5 2500 or better you'll have a great experience at max settings, but it'll still lag occasionally in cities. Overclocking will help a bit, but I don't think there's any setup out at the moment that can truly do 60fps everywhere in this game. Of course, you might not notice lag even if it drops below 60fps, and with an RPG like Skyrim FPS isn't all that important anyway.
User avatar
Nany Smith
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 8:07 pm

Wow, that's very good info. Thanks alot for the knowledge. :)

I didn't know there're different type of i5 processors. So I guess I have to find an i5 processor that has 2500k to allow overclocking to 4GHz+.
I'm kinda new to the overclock method due to my low IT knowledge but it looks like overclocking can benefit alot to the gameplay.

I'm wondering.. if the pc has good processor, ram and graphic card, would it cause more or less heat to the pc?
User avatar
Alexandra Louise Taylor
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:48 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 12:29 am

In a game oriented forum, use of the the word "good" with no contextual hints will always taken to be synonymous with "High Performance", and yes, the higher the performance, the more need there is for good housekeeping around the intake / exhaust vents, and high quality cooling systems. Along the same lines, if the CPU is the "brain" of a PC, and a GPU is its "heart", then its stomach and digestive system is its power supply, and needs to be of equal quality, but is far too often overlooked.
User avatar
Helen Quill
 
Posts: 3334
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:12 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 12:46 pm

Wow, that's very good info. Thanks alot for the knowledge. :smile:

I didn't know there're different type of i5 processors. So I guess I have to find an i5 processor that has 2500k to allow overclocking to 4GHz+.
I'm kinda new to the overclock method due to my low IT knowledge but it looks like overclocking can benefit alot to the gameplay.

I'm wondering.. if the pc has good processor, ram and graphic card, would it cause more or less heat to the pc?

As long as you have a fairly decent aftermarket computer case placed in a well-ventilated area, you shouldn't worry about heat. The main thing that will cause it is an overclocked CPU or graphics card. If your heatsink is seated properly with a good thermal compound, you should be fine.
User avatar
michael danso
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 6:10 pm

Wow, that's very good info. Thanks alot for the knowledge. :smile:

I didn't know there're different type of i5 processors. So I guess I have to find an i5 processor that has 2500k to allow overclocking to 4GHz+.
I'm kinda new to the overclock method due to my low IT knowledge but it looks like overclocking can benefit alot to the gameplay.

I'm wondering.. if the pc has good processor, ram and graphic card, would it cause more or less heat to the pc?
Overstocking an i5 2500k on a modern board is very easy, you quiet literally only have to change one single setting in bios (multiplier), and you can leave the rest on auto. Without any question, get an i5 2500k if you plan to play skyrim on very high graphical settings.

heat will generally depend on the component (high end parts tend to run hotter) as well as your coolign solution. A 22 dollar coller has kept my i5 2500k OC to 4.3 ghz running at a nice 45 C on full load.
User avatar
Noely Ulloa
 
Posts: 3596
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 1:33 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 3:21 am

Wondering if anyone can shed some light on why I'm getting unusually poor performance on my computer. This seems to be a problem only with Bethesda games, Fallout 3 and now Skyrim both had exactly the same performance issues. Basically, I'm getting unusually poor frame rates with constant stuttering when I turn or move. Computer specs are as follows:

CPU: Core i7 920 (d0 Bloomfield proc)
Mobo: MSI X58 Pro
RAM: 6GB DDR3
GPU: AMD HD Radeon 5970
HDD: 2 x WD 500GB SATAII HDDs in RAID 0

Correct me if I'm wrong, but these specs should run Skyrim on ultra with 30-60 FPS. At the moment I'm getting 12-20 FPS outdoors and 25-45 FPS indoors on ultra. On low settings I'm getting 50-60 FPS outdoors. I just want to check that my expectations for what my FPS should be are reasonable. Thanks.
User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 1:37 pm

Wondering if anyone can shed some light on why I'm getting unusually poor performance on my computer. This seems to be a problem only with Bethesda games, Fallout 3 and now Skyrim both had exactly the same performance issues. Basically, I'm getting unusually poor frame rates with constant stuttering when I turn or move. Computer specs are as follows:

CPU: Core i7 920 (d0 Bloomfield proc)
Mobo: MSI X58 Pro
RAM: 6GB DDR3
GPU: AMD HD Radeon 5970
HDD: 2 x WD 500GB SATAII HDDs in RAID 0

Correct me if I'm wrong, but these specs should run Skyrim on ultra with 30-60 FPS. At the moment I'm getting 12-20 FPS outdoors and 25-45 FPS indoors on ultra. On low settings I'm getting 50-60 FPS outdoors. I just want to check that my expectations for what my FPS should be are reasonable. Thanks.

Interesting. Have you tried turning down the settings to medium and high, and seeing how it performs for each?
User avatar
Pixie
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:50 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 3:23 am

I think I may have solved it. On a hunch I got rid of all the mods I'd installed and it got me back up to around the 30-40 FPS mark on an outdoor. I've narrowed it down to one of two texture mods - frankly I should've seen that one coming. Between that and disabling ENBSeries, it seems to have gotten the frames back up to what I would expect is normal. Apologies for my own incompetence.

In answer to your question, I tried lowering the settings before which brought the frames back up to about 40-60 FPS outdoors. I'm still getting a bit of stutter when I move, but the FPS issue seems to have cleared up. The other odd thing about Skyrim is that it seems to have problems with even a modest overclock on my GPU, even if benchmarks run fine.
User avatar
Floor Punch
 
Posts: 3568
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:18 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 2:40 am

Wondering if anyone can shed some light on why I'm getting unusually poor performance on my computer. This seems to be a problem only with Bethesda games, Fallout 3 and now Skyrim both had exactly the same performance issues. Basically, I'm getting unusually poor frame rates with constant stuttering when I turn or move. Computer specs are as follows:

CPU: Core i7 920 (d0 Bloomfield proc)
Mobo: MSI X58 Pro
RAM: 6GB DDR3
GPU: AMD HD Radeon 5970
HDD: 2 x WD 500GB SATAII HDDs in RAID 0

Correct me if I'm wrong, but these specs should run Skyrim on ultra with 30-60 FPS.
Where did you read that? IMHO those aren't reasonable expectations, for two reasons:

1) Several games don't play that nicely with crossfire/SLI. You might find some luck with the latest performance drivers from AMD (12.1 preview) but you should really set your expectation that the 5970 is at best performing like a 5870 in this game. However.. it could be worse because..

2) You only have a 2.66ghz CPU (+ a little for turbo, but not much). Skyrim doesn't take advantage of much more than two cores, and is instead highly dependant on single-threaded speed of your CPU. So your CPU is going to be limiting, especially in cities. Add in the fact that crossfire/SLI (whether internal to the card or not) has a slight CPU overhead as well and you've got even more limitation on performance.

Add in any mods and you're just going to create further load.

I would recommend disabling one of the GPUs in your 5970 so it runs as a single GPU, overclocking your CPU, not GPU (though bear in mind this may bring stability/other issues, so before reporting further errors check again at stock) and changing your settings to 'high' - as well as removing any mods.
User avatar
Hairul Hafis
 
Posts: 3516
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:22 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 2:01 am

Okay, I got Skyrim for Christmas, but my comp is a few years old, so wondering how well it would run.

Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9300 @ 2.5 Ghz
4 Gigs RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3650
I think my monitor resolution is 1024x720 or similar.

This thread said it would run on medium quality with this video card. But the box specs say a card with 512 MB.
User avatar
cassy
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:57 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 6:24 pm

The very latest fad is HD video, and all of the predictions are tied to the 1920 by 1080 resolution version of HD, which requires 512 MBs and good speed from the graphics card to handle. If you only have a 256 MB version of a Radeon HD 3650, you would fall short on the HD requirement, but if all you have is relatively Low Resolutions on your disply, you are in decent shape, I should think.
User avatar
marie breen
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:50 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 9:18 pm

For what its worth, even if the game came out a few years ago, Oblivion runs very well on here, and the graphics are beautiful
User avatar
Penny Wills
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:16 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 2:11 am

Alright, so here's my issue: I'm purchasing Skyrim for the PC pretty much only for screen-shots, because the console is invaluable in this situation... Gotta love the freeze time while using free-roam camera. Anyway, I only have 3gigs of RAM, but I meet or exceed all other requirements for "high" setting. My question is, will the 3 gigs be enough for good screenies or should i shovel out some dough for another gig?
User avatar
gandalf
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:57 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 8:54 pm

3gb is more than enough for Skyrim, provided you don't run stuff in the background that eats ram.
User avatar
Daniel Lozano
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:42 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 10:31 pm

Where did you read that? IMHO those aren't reasonable expectations, for two reasons:

1) Several games don't play that nicely with crossfire/SLI. You might find some luck with the latest performance drivers from AMD (12.1 preview) but you should really set your expectation that the 5970 is at best performing like a 5870 in this game. However.. it could be worse because..

2) You only have a 2.66ghz CPU (+ a little for turbo, but not much). Skyrim doesn't take advantage of much more than two cores, and is instead highly dependant on single-threaded speed of your CPU. So your CPU is going to be limiting, especially in cities. Add in the fact that crossfire/SLI (whether internal to the card or not) has a slight CPU overhead as well and you've got even more limitation on performance.

Add in any mods and you're just going to create further load.

I would recommend disabling one of the GPUs in your 5970 so it runs as a single GPU, overclocking your CPU, not GPU (though bear in mind this may bring stability/other issues, so before reporting further errors check again at stock) and changing your settings to 'high' - as well as removing any mods.

I assumed Crossfire wasn't going to play nice but I hadn't thought it would hold any negative impact. The list at the beginning of this thread seems to suggest the 5970 can run the game at ultra, hence my expectations. I'd tried earlier with some modest overclocks on both the GPU and CPU separately, but it seemed to have a negative effect if anything. I brought the CPU up to around 2.9GHz and saw no difference or maybe even a 5 FPS drop in some places.
User avatar
Monika
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:50 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 3:42 pm

I assumed Crossfire wasn't going to play nice but I hadn't thought it would hold any negative impact. The list at the beginning of this thread seems to suggest the 5970 can run the game at ultra, hence my expectations. I'd tried earlier with some modest overclocks on both the GPU and CPU separately, but it seemed to have a negative effect if anything. I brought the CPU up to around 2.9GHz and saw no difference or maybe even a 5 FPS drop in some places.


Tig ol' Bitties started from the old lists originally compiled by Not theKing, and added newer cards to it, well before either the game itself, or its (misleading) requirements were announced, and never amended it materially that I am aware of. He probably made a wrong assumption, and guessed that CF would be usable this time. The actual facts being revealed by the game itself are that he was far too optimistic, just as the requirements are.

For the member with the comment about screen shots, and only 3 GBs of main memory, it would be my own opinion that your screen shots are more likely to be impacted by your video card, your display's resolution, and your VRAM amount, if that display is at a High Resolution for default.
User avatar
Sudah mati ini Keparat
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:14 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 8:20 pm

Going to try and run Skyrim on an...

Intel Core2Duo E6320, 1.86GHz
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT, 512MB
2GB RAM
WinXP SP3
Mobo: Asus P5S MX-SE
PSU I'm going to assume 350W since the model name says 350ATX

Will this be okay for low settings on 1024x640 windowed? I'm only getting problems with the crappy RealTek HD Audio integrated in the mobo.
User avatar
Paul Rice
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:51 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim