Unofficial "Will My PC Run Skyrim" Thread #56 w hard

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 2:37 pm

Going to try and run Skyrim on an...

Intel Core2Duo E6320, 1.86GHz
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT, 512MB
2GB RAM
WinXP SP3
Mobo: Asus P5S MX-SE
PSU I'm going to assume 350W since the model name says 350ATX

Will this be okay for low settings on 1024x640 windowed? I'm only getting problems with the crappy RealTek HD Audio integrated in the mobo.

That CPU is really a huge bottleneck for you. The low resolution screen will mostly affect the image quality situation, not the overall performance, so there is going to be a lot of frame rate fluctuation depending upon all of the heavy demands that the game puts on processors.
User avatar
IM NOT EASY
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 12:47 pm

and they say "dont even attempt to play with an integrated card, you wont get passed the loading screen"

http://youtu.be/o7xBGgkGPxo

Just uploaded this one. not perfect but Its playable.

skyrim on Intel HD 3000. Hopefully this helps some folks
User avatar
Stephani Silva
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:11 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 9:30 pm

Ignore the exaggeration. Only a masochist would consider the results from such poor trash to be acceptable.
User avatar
Justin Hankins
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:36 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 12:14 am

Ignore the exaggeration. Only a masochist would consider the results from such poor trash to be acceptable.
why so serious? thats pretty acceptable for someone with no other way to play the game and wants it on PC. Obviously a dedicated card will be better as mentioned in the info section.
User avatar
Queen Bitch
 
Posts: 3312
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 2:43 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 4:44 am

The official requirements, for all that they ended up being meaningless, are purposely based on the HD standard, 1920 by 1080, which does in fact need 512 MBs to handle correctly at game animation speed. Intel does not give their video chips any VRAM. None.

Based on the HD resolution, only the better 128 bit graphics cards are capable of handling the game properly, but Bethesda did not name any cutoff point at all, so it is a matter of conjecture and anecdotal documentation to identify a cutoff point in retrospect. Many of the suggestions / predictions on the very first, original message, have proven inaccurate.

Neither of the authors have seen fit to amend the lists, but Intel certainly doesn't belong on there among the solutions predicted as usable.
User avatar
Becky Cox
 
Posts: 3389
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:38 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 8:32 pm

The official requirements, for all that they ended up being meaningless, are purposely based on the HD standard, 1920 by 1080, which does in fact need 512 MBs to handle correctly at game animation speed. Intel does not give their video chips any VRAM. None.

Based on the HD resolution, only the better 128 bit graphics cards are capable of handling the game properly, but Bethesda did not name any cutoff point at all, so it is a matter of conjecture and anecdotal documentation to identify a cutoff point in retrospect. Many of the suggestions / predictions on the very first, original message, have proven inaccurate.

Neither of the authors have seen fit to amend the lists, but Intel certainly doesn't belong on there among the solutions predicted as usable.
Ahh I see where you are coming from, they dont need to add this to the list, I dont even think intel should add it to their list of supported games. Im just trying to show that you CAN run the game decently on this card(Especially seeing as its the laptop version, I assume the desktop version would be better). I for one though can't wait to build my computer this summer
User avatar
Ells
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:03 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 5:24 pm

I'm planning on getting one with these specs instead, how well could it run?

AMD A6-3650 2.6ghz
6GB RAM
1GB DDR3 Radeon HD 6570
User avatar
Sarah Knight
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:02 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 12:40 am

How about this:

AMD Athlon II X2 240, 2.81 GHz
2GB of RAM
NVidia GeForce 9400 GT, 512MB

Planning to run it on low-medium settings.
User avatar
Ruben Bernal
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:58 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 8:37 pm

Hello, I'm new to this forum, as I stumbled upon this thread via Google.
I don't know all that much about hardware, and as many others, I have been wondering if my PC will be able to run TESV:Skyrim.

I would be more than happy with medium details in a moderate resolution, as I've always valued gameplay higher than graphics.
However, the question remains if I would be able to get at least 30 fps out of the rig listed below. If not, what is my "weakest link"?

I thank for any feedback to this question. I greatly appreciate any feedback.


The main parts of my PC are:

Motherboard: ASUS Commando Republic of Gamers
CPU: Intel Core2Duo E6600 (2400 MHz / 1066 MHz FSB)
RAM: 2x2 GB Kingston Value RAM (1333 MHz if I remember correctly)
Graphics: 8800GTX (768 MB)
OS: Win7 x64

All right, so I went out on a limb here, and purchased the game.
I run the game fluently in 1440x900 on Medium settings, and the game still looks great. (I have not had the pleasure of seeing the game on ultrahigh, so this might cloud my opinion a bit!)

I just wanted to share this information, in case someone is in a similar dilemma as I was.
Long story short: I'm more than satisfied with how the game runs for me! :)

Thanks for the help :goodjob:
User avatar
Emma Parkinson
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:53 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 3:24 pm

How about this:

AMD Athlon II X2 240, 2.81 GHz
2GB of RAM
NVidia GeForce 9400 GT, 512MB

Planning to run it on low-medium settings.


You won't have that option with that GPU, unless the screen resolution is quite low; the 9400 GT is very weak sauce, very weak.


I'm planning on getting one with these specs instead, how well could it run?

AMD A6-3650 2.6ghz
6GB RAM
1GB DDR3 Radeon HD 6570


You haven't named a screen resolution. The HD 6570 isn't a super duper GPU, but it's not "bad" for medium resolutions, and that particular APU model's included graphics is supposed to enhance the discrete GPU card's performance via CF.
User avatar
Danger Mouse
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:55 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 2:55 pm

How well could I run Skyrim on my laptop?

Intel I5 M460 2.53 ghz
4gb ram
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Looking at a resolution around 1280x1024 maybe a little higher. Also looking to know if the game causes any sort of over heating problems with laptops or not.
User avatar
Emily Shackleton
 
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 10:24 pm

How well could I run Skyrim on my laptop?

Intel I5 M460 2.53 ghz
4gb ram
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Looking at a resolution around 1280x1024 maybe a little higher. Also looking to know if the game causes any sort of over heating problems with laptops or not.
Yes, Skyrim is hard on laptops, so make sure you have good cooling. As always the performance also depends on the exact drivers and power conditions, which vary wildly for laptops. Aside from that you should be OK on medium at that resolution I think.
User avatar
how solid
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:27 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 8:30 pm

Yes, Skyrim is hard on laptops, so make sure you have good cooling. As always the performance also depends on the exact drivers and power conditions, which vary wildly for laptops. Aside from that you should be OK on medium at that resolution I think.

Well so far I haven't had any over heating problems on my laptop and I've played games like crysis at medium high and I play shogun2 DX11 at high settings. It never given me trouble before but I'd read a little that skyrim gave laptops some heating trouble so I just wanted to see if that was indeed a fact. I actually have the game for the ps3 now but I wa slooking to switch out for the pc one for mods.
User avatar
barbara belmonte
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:12 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 3:10 am

Laptop design has almost always placed "form" above function, so very few have adequate cooling for long gaming sessions. It isn't individual games so much as it is the immersion keeping the sessions going until the system has to slow itself down because it has exceeded the level of cooling capacity it offers.

Never waste time comparing games that do not share engines. To a great extent, you can compare FO3, and to a lesser extent, Oblivion. Other than those, comparisons do not mean much, really. Incidentally, you probably should run a search for HD 5650 in the forum here. The laptop card is only "loosely" related to the desktop HD 5670, which is an excellent card, even today. I am pretty sure that your particular graphics card (or some drivers for it) have been said here to have a few anomalous effects in some areas and some situations.
User avatar
RUby DIaz
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:18 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 4:07 am

Laptop design has almost always placed "form" above function, so very few have adequate cooling for long gaming sessions. It isn't individual games so much as it is the immersion keeping the sessions going until the system has to slow itself down because it has exceeded the level of cooling capacity it offers.

Never waste time comparing games that do not share engines. To a great extent, you can compare FO3, and to a lesser extent, Oblivion. Other than those, comparisons do not mean much, really.

Well I've played New Vegas on my laptop at high settings at least (forget the exact set up)
User avatar
BrEezy Baby
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 2:28 pm

Well I've played New Vegas on my laptop at high settings at least (forget the exact set up)
Sounds about right. Skyrim is a step up from New Vegas in terms of demands, especially city areas (completely different lighting and shadow engine).
User avatar
Rudi Carter
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:09 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 3:03 pm

can the asus g74sx run on high? for those of who dont know the specs here are they

i7 preocessor
8gb of ram
nvidia geforce gtx 560m with 3gb/2gb gddr5 vram

i know the processor can handle it but can the card support skyrim on maxed graphics?
User avatar
Ashley Clifft
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:56 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 1:38 pm

can the asus g74sx run on high? for those of who dont know the specs here are they

i7 preocessor
8gb of ram
nvidia geforce gtx 560m with 3gb/2gb gddr5 vram

i know the processor can handle it but can the card support skyrim on maxed graphics?
I don't know if your processor can handle maxed graphics, but it should be able to run High no problem. Usual laptop disclaimer notwithstanding.
User avatar
i grind hard
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:58 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 4:05 pm

I don't know if your processor can handle maxed graphics, but it should be able to run High no problem. Usual laptop disclaimer notwithstanding.

Isn't i7 Intel's newest? I know newer doesn't mean better but still.
User avatar
OnlyDumazzapplyhere
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:43 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 8:45 pm

There are numerous varieties of i7s, with different base core speeds, different integrated graphics aboard, and different Turbo top speeds; at this point the specific i7 remains unidentified.
User avatar
Neliel Kudoh
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:39 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 4:55 am

There are numerous varieties of i7s, with different base core speeds, different integrated graphics aboard, and different Turbo top speeds; at this point the specific i7 remains unidentified.

Ah, I see then.
User avatar
Pawel Platek
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 2:08 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 10:19 pm

There are numerous varieties of i7s, with different base core speeds, different integrated graphics aboard, and different Turbo top speeds; at this point the specific i7 remains unidentified.

Intel? Core? i7 2630QM Processor in the laptop im getting
User avatar
suzan
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:32 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 3:16 pm

Intel? Core? i7 2630QM Processor in the laptop im getting
It's a sandy bridge varient, which is good, but has a max turbo frequency of 2.9ghz, which is too slow to run Skyrim on Ultra smoothly. High settings should be OK though.
User avatar
Dominic Vaughan
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 1:47 pm

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 9:29 pm

Hey, all my RAM and graphics are fine, but my processor is only 2.1GHz, it's a dual core though. How do you think it will be, because my aim on getting the PC version is to avoid the horrible lag on PS3 after playing for over two hours at a time.
User avatar
Bedford White
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:09 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 1:43 pm

Hey, all my RAM and graphics are fine, but my processor is only 2.1GHz, it's a dual core though. How do you think it will be, because my aim on getting the PC version is to avoid the horrible lag on PS3 after playing for over two hours at a time.
User avatar
Sharra Llenos
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:09 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim

cron