Vikings

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:13 am

How about reading a book on the subject instead? Or is that a terribly outdated media?


I've read many books and articles about vikings, but movies and games are far more accessible when simply mentioning them in a forum.

Recently, I've been reading the Northlanders series, Vol 1-4. Great stuff!
User avatar
Beth Belcher
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:39 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:06 am

Fictional stuff I recommend Jan Guillou's trilogy about Arn Magnusson (although almost the entire 2nd book takes place in Jerusalem). There's also a decent movie made based on the trilogy called Arn: The Knight Templar.

Also, there's an old saga about the viking Red Wyrm (R?de Orm), but I'm not sure it was ever translated into English. It's epic, though, and one of the best fictional viking novels I've ever read.
User avatar
Calum Campbell
 
Posts: 3574
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:55 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:18 am

I've read many books and articles about vikings, but movies and games are far more accessible when simply mentioning them in a forum.

Recently, I've been reading the Northlanders series, Vol 1-4. Great stuff!

A comic book? haha nice one
User avatar
Holli Dillon
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:54 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:08 am

"Yeah well, I'm no fan of the medieval british culture in fantasy either. in my opinion when creating a world it is important to create from scratch, if I want a civilization I'd start with writing key questions."


The problem is that its too hard to start from scratch when adding humans to a medieval/classical era style rpg. Empires would pretty much function same way...ruling over certain provinces, etc, along with the issues that go along with controlling other nations. As far as I'm concerned the only things tes borrows from ancient rome is some of the armor and weapons and the style of latin names. They created their own gods, own unique characters, and unique cities/towns. Let's face it, elves and orcs aren't exactly original either...its the slight cultural differences and lore that does set them apart from other games


As I said taking inspiration from the real world is inevitable but you could do it a little more subtle and mix it up. I think a good example in the TES world is the dunmer and a bad example the nords.

With this i'm not saying though in any way that I hate the nords and think that skyrim will svck, so any nord fanatics feeling like they want to carve blood eagle on me viking style can put down the dagger.
User avatar
Joe Alvarado
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:13 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:14 am

How about reading a book on the subject instead? Or is that a terribly outdated media?

I had no idea about the movei but I'm actually reading the first book right now, I love how it paints the nothern culture of that world, I kinda wish I could see Winterfall
User avatar
FoReVeR_Me_N
 
Posts: 3556
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:25 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:55 am

Yea just ignore the longships in Morrowind, the horned helmets (which although inaccurate are a common stereotype) the name Nord (Nordic, Norseman, Normandy, Norway) the references to Beowulf, the names of Nord characters...

That's as far as it should go. There is enough staid, repetitive media indulging the Viking fetish of nerds to sink a flotilla of those longboats.

Somehow, whenever you have races that are inspired by real-world cultures, the result is incredibly uninspired. Elder Scrolls cannot mirror the reality of Scandinavian culture in any way that is more meaningful or interesting than that culture itself. It can only offer dim parody unless 90% of the content is creative and new.

And we're already halfway there. The Vinlandsaga isn't full of references to the cyclical nature of time and multiple repetitious universes, is it?
User avatar
James Potter
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:40 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:49 am

A comic book? haha nice one


Ha, how ignorant of you! Of all the literature I've read about vikings, Northlanders accomplishes depicting the multi-faceted culture of the vikings perfectly. From an Irish farmer on the run from ruthless invaders, to a widowed shield maiden in a plague-infested town, to an exiled warrior becoming a slave in Constantinople and returning to his homeland for revenge, to an English boy who seeks revenge on his father and brother by exposing their location to an invading horde and BECOMING a viking, to a group of three females escaping a massacre who, now widowed, shield themselves in an abandoned castle. It may have pictures, but they aren't pretty. It may come in issues, but each story arc introduces themes such as religion, sixism, devotion, and atonement.

Still laughing?
User avatar
Ashley Hill
 
Posts: 3516
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:27 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:16 am



Somehow, whenever you have races that are inspired by real-world cultures, the result is incredibly uninspired. Elder Scrolls cannot mirror the reality of Scandinavian culture in any way that is more meaningful or interesting than that culture itself.



So word that just simply typing 'word' isn't enough.
User avatar
Mr.Broom30
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:05 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:54 pm

Using pathfinder as a source for information about vikings, is like using a Tom & Jerry magazine as source on american history.
Its one of the worst movies ive ever seen. Complete garbage and a insult to our Scandinavian history and culture.
Anyone even mentioning it in debate about vikings deseves to get slapped with a frozen fish.


I agree with you on that, "Pathfinder" is way far from being a good movie.. except for the special effects.. that was sort of good..

Vikings didn't always slaughter entire villages...that's only seen on history channel to spice things up. If you fought back you'd be killed, but raids were usually to get rich and get out quick. Alfred the great slowly stopped viking raids by building strong fortifications that vikings generally didn't want to waste time trying to raid. They liked unprotected small settlements close to coastal line. They wanted to avoid battle, not potentially die doing a dangerous raid


True, most "battles" during the time of the Vikings were more of frightening your enemy then actually engaging them in combat. Unlike what many thinks it was more psychology then bloodshed on a Viking battlefield.

the war sled scene is embarrasing when the main character rides he's shield like a toboggan down the snow slopes, hunted by vikings using pimped kicksleds.


When will they ever make a good viking movie?


"The Thirteenth Warrior" gives a pretty good picture of the Vikings in my opinion.
User avatar
Nathan Hunter
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 9:58 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:42 am

look through history every culture around the atlantic have horror stories about the barbarian hordes from the north and their bloodly unquechable thrist for war


the people trying to invade their countries? Yeah I'm sure they'll be saying nice stuff about them, how about the roman empire, who had some of the most brutal executions of all time and were completely ruthless in terms of, you either had to join them or die, but they also united a large part of the world, as did the vikings. Also the vikings have only been portrayed that way since the late 19th/early 20th centuries. I would like to know where you get your "facts" from.
User avatar
butterfly
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:20 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:39 am

Remember seeing something on the History Chanel about the Blood Eagle, one of the most disturbing forms of execution.
On topic, as many have pointed out Vikings were not all about raiding, in some ways they were more civilized than the Anglos that they raided. The whole savage barbarian was more of an image, both that the Vikings wanted to display and that the English would describe them as.


The saxons and vikings are from the same place.
User avatar
NO suckers In Here
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:05 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:03 am

Viking history and culture references only for Skyrim.
User avatar
sarah taylor
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:36 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:13 am

That's as far as it should go. There is enough staid, repetitive media indulging the Viking fetish of nerds to sink a flotilla of those longboats.


Obviously ES Nords do not directly correlate to medieval Scandinavians, but I think the viking fetish is still overcrowded by pirates, ninjas, zombies, and whatever pop culture memes are present. I could stomach a few more references to Viking culture, such as the blood eagle, as people have said, or ship burials like the one in MW.
User avatar
D IV
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:32 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:08 pm

Obviously ES Nords do not directly correlate to medieval Scandinavians, but I think the viking fetish is still overcrowded by pirates, ninjas, zombies, and whatever pop culture memes are present. I could stomach a few more references to Viking culture, such as the blood eagle, as people have said, or ship burials like the one in MW.

Pirates are cool but overrated, like Ninjas.
User avatar
glot
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:41 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:47 pm

Pirates are cool but overrated, like Ninjas.


Well, vikings are technically pirates. So +1.
User avatar
anna ley
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:04 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:28 am

Pirates are cool but overrated, like Ninjas.


Ninjas overrated?

:stare:

That's HERESY!!!

Ontopic: Imo, vikings are the most misunderstood people in history. They were more civilized than any other cultures in Europe by that time, technologically superior, and with an incredible ability to organize themselves when needed - in war, as well as internally whenever they needed something done. When the danes were threthened by saxson kings in the mid-900's they rapidly organized the construction of several large fortresses spread all over the country, just to prevent an invasion. All done within a decade. And when some king in England decided to throw out all the viking settlers in the eastern part of the country - and did so after a terrible genocide - the danes became angry and retaliated by conquering most of England shortly after (which led to 'Danelagen', a dane-controlled part of England). And that's just a small part of their deeds. In the east, swedish vikings founded Russia (I know many russians don't agree, but it's a debatable fact :yes: ), and vikings from Norway discovered Iceland, Greenland and Nothern America. So no, the vikings were not barbarians. They were just infidels, and as such they have been judged by christian historicans ever since.
BTW, the danes became christianized around 980. It's written on a stone somewhere in Jutland. Shortly after, the viking-age ended.
User avatar
Esther Fernandez
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:52 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:11 am

"As I said taking inspiration from the real world is inevitable but you could do it a little more subtle and mix it up. I think a good example in the TES world is the dunmer and a bad example the nords."



Dark elves were used probably 100 times before if not more in other fantasy settings.Its the story and lore behind them in tes that makes them unique. Same for the other races. As a gamer, and rpg fan, I like content not to be too alien and have some sort of connection, especially with 'men'. If jrr tolkien made men in his story completely uninspired from real life and more alien, I don't think his books would have as big as an impact as they did. In tes I liked how elves, and non human races had vastly different culture and more fantastical and I hope its kept that way
User avatar
Josephine Gowing
 
Posts: 3545
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:41 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:13 pm

Seeing as Nords are heavily based on old Dane culture where Laws were primative and violence was an accepted, and people basically became vikings to get rich... im just wondering how far this might be taken in the game?

Personally Id love to become a viking and get rich by murdering everyone in a village then pillaging, punishing me some other way rather than being nagged by an all-knowing police-nord forcing me to go to jail to make me nice again......any thoughts?

On a side note im not trying to say all vikings/ similar cultures are bloodthirsty barbarians, more interested in how deeply that culture will be implimented in the game seeing as it is obviously influenced visually.

They didnt became vikings, they were born vikings but some of them just went looking (Beserks)
User avatar
Chelsea Head
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:38 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:54 pm

The Old Saxon way of life is actually a lot similar to the Viking way, mostly because Vikings ruled for a time the British Isles, England, Wales, Scotland and also Ireland were for a time under Viking control. Their hold over the British Isles didn't end until William the Conquer came from Normandy.

You are joking right? Vikings never ruled Scotland, Wales or Ireland. They ruled Northern England for a short time before they were pushed out by the Saxons. The Vikings invaded Northern England years later ( and were defeated to a man at Stamford Bridge), at the same time that William the Conquer invaded from the south. It was the only way that they could defeat the Saxon Housecarls' shield wall. For the record, the Scots, or Picts, terrified the Vikings, and it is well known that the Vikings gave Scotland a wide berth.

Also, Saxon England was the most sophisticated country in Europe at the time, with its weaving, metal work, systems of common law, and taxes. This was the reason that William the Conquer and the Danes coveted the English throne so much.
User avatar
Bonnie Clyde
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:02 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:33 am

An interesting factoid if no one mentioned it yet:
Vikings didn't actually use horned helmets. Somehow that myth caught on within the last couple hundred years.
User avatar
Bloomer
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 9:23 pm

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:07 am

You are joking right? Vikings never ruled Scotland, Wales or Ireland. They ruled Northern England for a short time before they were pushed out by the Saxons. The Vikings invaded Northern England years later ( and were defeated to a man at Stamford Bridge), at the same time that William the Conquer invaded from the south. It was the only way that they could defeat the Saxon Housecarls' shield wall. For the record, the Scots, or Picts, terrified the Vikings, and it is well known that the Vikings gave Scotland a wide berth.

Also, Saxon England was the most sophisticated country in Europe at the time, with its weaving, metal work, systems of common law, and taxes. This was the reason that William the Conquer and the Danes coveted the English throne so much.


If I am not mistaking,the word "Housecarl" is nordic and means "Man of the House"..
I believe it was the ROMANS that where afraid of the Picts, thats why they built both Hadrian's Wall and the Antonine Wall.


Ontopic: Imo, vikings are the most misunderstood people in history. They were more civilized than any other cultures in Europe by that time, technologically superior, and with an incredible ability to organize themselves when needed - in war, as well as internally whenever they needed something done. When the danes were threthened by saxson kings in the mid-900's they rapidly organized the construction of several large fortresses spread all over the country, just to prevent an invasion. All done within a decade. And when some king in England decided to throw out all the viking settlers in the eastern part of the country - and did so after a terrible genocide - the danes became angry and retaliated by conquering most of England shortly after (which led to 'Danelagen', a dane-controlled part of England). And that's just a small part of their deeds. In the east, swedish vikings founded Russia (I know many russians don't agree, but it's a debatable fact :yes: ), and vikings from Norway discovered Iceland, Greenland and Nothern America. So no, the vikings were not barbarians. They were just infidels, and as such they have been judged by christian historicans ever since.
BTW, the danes became christianized around 980. It's written on a stone somewhere in Jutland. Shortly after, the viking-age ended.

User avatar
Angus Poole
 
Posts: 3594
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 9:04 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:57 pm

The vikings ar misunderstood in the sense that they're "simply" barbarians. In war they were ruthless as they used tactics that ignored any real honor code, they used the sea to their advantage and
liked to attack people unaware(which is smart), one of their main trades was slaves and they did follow a very violent religion. And this was the verison everyone else saw of them, those who were attacked. And
the letters turks wrote about them, their weird customs bad manners and disrespectful ways. However amongst themselves, in their society we learn that they have a deep culture, their rights are suprisingly equal between
man and woman for that time and so on.

During my school education I was told different versions depending on teachers, some portrayed them as peaceful traders that pretty much never touched a weapon while some went with the more bloodthirsty barbarian approach.
It wasn't really until senior high school(I think that's what it's called in english when you're about 16 years old right?) that I got a teacher that actually presented some kind of proof and didn't stick completely to one side of the story.
From there on I did some research on my own and have come to the conclusion that vikings are pretty much a mix of both versions. But it also varies between countries. Swedish vikings were generally more into trading than the norwegian for example.

"As I said taking inspiration from the real world is inevitable but you could do it a little more subtle and mix it up. I think a good example in the TES world is the dunmer and a bad example the nords."



Dark elves were used probably 100 times before if not more in other fantasy settings.Its the story and lore behind them in tes that makes them unique. Same for the other races. As a gamer, and rpg fan, I like content not to be too alien and have some sort of connection, especially with 'men'. If jrr tolkien made men in his story completely uninspired from real life and more alien, I don't think his books would have as big as an impact as they did. In tes I liked how elves, and non human races had vastly different culture and more fantastical and I hope its kept that way


Well I have pretty much never read fantasy or played fantasy games where there are dark elves except for tes so I guess i'm lucky :celebrate:

And as I said, it's difficult not to draw inspiration, but that dosen't mean you have to copy half a culture and paste it into your own world... Like they did with the nords.
User avatar
renee Duhamel
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:12 am

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:20 pm

The vikings ar misunderstood in the sense that they're "simply" barbarians. In war they were ruthless as they used tactics that ignored any real honor code, they used the sea to their advantage and
liked to attack people unaware(which is smart), one of their main trades was slaves and they did follow a very violent religion. And this was the verison everyone else saw of them, those who were attacked. And
the letters turks wrote about them, their weird customs bad manners and disrespectful ways. However amongst themselves, in their society we learn that they have a deep culture, their rights are suprisingly equal between
man and woman for that time and so on.

During my school education I was told different versions depending on teachers, some portrayed them as peaceful traders that pretty much never touched a weapon while some went with the more bloodthirsty barbarian approach.
It wasn't really until senior high school(I think that's what it's called in english when you're about 16 years old right?) that I got a teacher that actually presented some kind of proof and didn't stick completely to one side of the story.
From there on I did some research on my own and have come to the conclusion that vikings are pretty much a mix of both versions. But it also varies between countries. Swedish vikings were generally more into trading than the norwegian for example.


One thing you left out about the Vikings, they were also explorers. They where in North America long before Columbus and they colonized Iceland and Greenland long before any other power in Europe started "long-distance-colonisation". I have even heard tales about that there were a "white" native American tribe when the "first" colonist/pioneers arrived from Europe to America.
User avatar
Lizbeth Ruiz
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:35 pm

Post » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:36 pm

If I am not mistaking,the word "Housecarl" is nordic and means "Man of the House"..
I believe it was the ROMANS that where afraid of the Picts, thats why they built both Hadrian's Wall and the Antonine Wall.


Huskarl. It does mean, directly translated, "houseman". A huskarl is a man that works under someone, usually on big farms etc. a servant sort of, under cheiftains, rich farmers etc., and preform various duties, most of all they functioned as troops.
User avatar
Nicole Coucopoulos
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 4:09 am

Post » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:22 am

You are joking right? Vikings never ruled Scotland, Wales or Ireland. They ruled Northern England for a short time before they were pushed out by the Saxons. The Vikings invaded Northern England years later ( and were defeated to a man at Stamford Bridge), at the same time that William the Conquer invaded from the south. It was the only way that they could defeat the Saxon Housecarls' shield wall. For the record, the Scots, or Picts, terrified the Vikings, and it is well known that the Vikings gave Scotland a wide berth.

Also, Saxon England was the most sophisticated country in Europe at the time, with its weaving, metal work, systems of common law, and taxes. This was the reason that William the Conquer and the Danes coveted the English throne so much.


Well, they never ruled all of Ireland, but they certainly ruled parts of it - perhaps most noticably Dublin. Which is basically the same that can be said of the english until Cromwell showed up.
User avatar
BRIANNA
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:51 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim