» Wed May 22, 2013 7:14 pm
I think affixing any actual concrete sphere to Padhome is, ultimately, overly simplifying, but useful for explaining the basic concept. The most complete way I've come up with to explain Anu and Padhome is a bit of a tautology, I think, but it's the best way I can think of to explain the relationship without trying to affix concrete concepts to either one. Anu IS anything Padhome IS NOT. Padhome IS NOT anything Anu IS. Since, ultimately, that's the interaction: cosmic IS, cosmic IS NOT.
Padhome most definitely IS NOT evil, though, because applying moralistic ideals to concepts so high up they lack any personal awareness is far too simple on the overall.
With regards to the Aedra and Daedra, though: Everything conscious arises from the interplay of Anu and Padhome, the space called the Grey Maybe where they meet. This is where the original et'Ada came from, Lorkhan and Aka included, and so no single entity capable of experiencing itself can be said to be wholly Anuic or wholly Padhomaic. HOWEVER, it is possible for an entity to be heavily aligned to one of the two - Lorkhan being essentially the son or direct descendant of Padhome, Aka the same with Anu, and so forth. The Aedra are, as a rule, more Anuic, whilst the Daedra are more Padhomaic. There are always exceptions, of course, especially because the Aedra are dead-dreaming and subject to the myths of mortals. It would certainly be possible to dream up an aspect of Aka, for instance, that was more Padhomaic than one might expect (you might even suggest that Alduin became this entity).