What would you do if you took over the world.

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:21 am

Well...
User avatar
Jason White
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:54 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:34 am

1. I'd kill all the humans.
2. Who cares? I killed all the humans. Problems SOLVED.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxoqVvBWJLk
User avatar
JLG
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:42 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:13 am

It's hip anyway, why do you think people start smoking it? Illegalising them would make it harder to get.

And it would increase the frequency of illegal drug trafficking, which has been shown to cause violence in and out of gangs, and feed off of young people's "I must press the button that I'm not allowed to press" mentality.
User avatar
Zach Hunter
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:26 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:51 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxoqVvBWJLk

:touched:

bonus clip!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQg8JKo_3ZQ
User avatar
christelle047
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:50 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:04 pm

I would make all healthcare free, unless it is drug-related in which case you have to pay all expenses and can't be insure for it. Should be a good deterrent.

So people will resort to crime to pay for private treatment?
User avatar
Kelvin Diaz
 
Posts: 3214
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 5:16 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:26 am

So people will resort to crime to pay for private treatment?
And it would increase the frequency of illegal drug trafficking, which has been shown to cause violence in and out of gangs, and feed off of young people's "I must press the button that I'm not allowed to press" mentality.

That's what the police are there for, and that would be another priority on my list: deduct funds from the world army budget and invest it all into new technologies and general funding for the police, and put lots of money into making drugs seem a lot worse than they are for kids. Also go on a worldwide campaign to burn all tobacco and other drug crops.
User avatar
Brian LeHury
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 6:54 am

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:34 am

That's what the police are there for, and that would be another priority on my list: deduct funds from the world army budget and invest it all into new technologies and general funding for the police, and put lots of money into making drugs seem a lot worse than they are for kids. Also go on a worldwide campaign to burn all tobacco and other drug crops.

.........I'm going to compile a list now.

1) No police force on the planet can or ever will be able to seize control over drug trafficking
2) Stifling the army's budget in such hostile and tense times would be disastrous
3) Lying to the public about the effects of drugs is already being done and is horribly failing
4) Burning all of it would just make everyone in the world high as [censored] for a few days

That last one may or may not have been a joke.
User avatar
Kelvin Diaz
 
Posts: 3214
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 5:16 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:16 pm

4) Burning all of it would just make everyone in the world high as [censored] for a few days
Pokoyo for president!
User avatar
.X chantelle .x Smith
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:25 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:15 am

That's what the police are there for, and that would be another priority on my list: deduct funds from the world army budget and invest it all into new technologies and general funding for the police, and put lots of money into making drugs seem a lot worse than they are for kids. Also go on a worldwide campaign to burn all tobacco and other drug crops.

So you'd lie to the public (which they would find out the moment someone says "Heeey, I just ate this shroom...AND MY BRAIN DIDN'T EXPLODE!" making them loose all trust in you.) Then you'd weaken your army, and put that money into funding doughnut-munchers, even though the army can do anything coppers can, but better, furthermore police wouldn't be able to quell serious armed revolts rising up all over the world in protest of your insane regime.
User avatar
Ridhwan Hemsome
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 2:13 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:24 pm

So you'd lie to the public (which they would find out the moment someone says "Heeey, I just ate this shroom...AND MY BRAIN DIDN'T EXPLODE!" making them loose all trust in you.) Then you'd weaken your army, and put that money into funding doughnut-munchers, even though the army can do anything coppers can, but better, furthermore police wouldn't be able to quell serious armed revolts rising up all over the world in protest of your insane regime.

Still a better ending than Mass Effect 3.
User avatar
Kelly Tomlinson
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:57 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 12:27 pm

.........I'm going to compile a list now.

1) No police force on the planet can or ever will be able to seize control over drug trafficking
2) Stifling the army's budget in such hostile and tense times would be disastrous
3) Lying to the public about the effects of drugs is already being done and is horribly failing
4) Burning all of it would just make everyone in the world high as [censored] for a few days

That last one may or may not have been a joke.

Hey, I have the moon lazorrr that I used to take over the world to back me up here! I don't need an army!

We may not be able to control it, but we can certainly do more to reduce it. For example, drug checker police at schools, checking everyone every day for drugs, more drug sniffing dogs patrolling the streets, constant searches for drug producing facilities (i.e thermal camera equipped police helicopters are good at finding weed farms), prosecution for usage of drugs etc etc. I'm not saying drug problems can be completely eradicated, but a lot more can be done to reduce the amount of drug problems.

And I don't think the public are being lied to, the effects aren't really exaggerated as much as they should be, and it needs to be embedded into people from the earliest possible ages.
User avatar
Sophie Louise Edge
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:09 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:36 am

Hey, I have the moon lazorrr that I used to take over the world to back me up here! I don't need an army!

We may not be able to control it, but we can certainly do more to reduce it. For example, drug checker police at schools, checking everyone every day for drugs, more drug sniffing dogs patrolling the streets, constant searches for drug producing facilities (i.e thermal camera equipped police helicopters are good at finding weed farms), prosecution for usage of drugs etc etc. I'm not saying drug problems can be completely eradicated, but a lot more can be done to reduce the amount of drug problems.

And I don't think the public are being lied to, the effects aren't really exaggerated as much as they should be, and it needs to be embedded into people from the earliest possible ages.
Well no offense but some of these ideas are unconstitutional.
User avatar
Jessica Raven
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:33 am

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:03 am

1) Build a time machine, discover the secret of immortality, travel back to the middle ages with advanced tech
2) Declare myself god-emperor of man kind.
User avatar
Sarah Edmunds
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:03 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:06 am

Well no offense but some of these ideas are unconstitutional.

I don't mean like stripping people down, maybe just having them sniffed by dogs or using some special drug detecting device invented with the increased funds.
User avatar
Juan Cerda
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:49 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:36 am

1) Build a time machine, discover the secret of immortality, travel back to the middle ages with advanced tech
2) Declare myself god-emperor of man kind.
Brilliant idea!

I don't mean like stripping people down, maybe just having them sniffed by dogs or using some special drug detecting device invented with the increased funds.
I meant things like thermal helicopters. They could vilolate people's privacy...
User avatar
Prohibited
 
Posts: 3293
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:13 am

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:42 am

Hey, I have the moon lazorrr that I used to take over the world to back me up here! I don't need an army!

We may not be able to control it, but we can certainly do more to reduce it. For example, drug checker police at schools, checking everyone every day for drugs, more drug sniffing dogs patrolling the streets, constant searches for drug producing facilities (i.e thermal camera equipped police helicopters are good at finding weed farms), prosecution for usage of drugs etc etc. I'm not saying drug problems can be completely eradicated, but a lot more can be done to reduce the amount of drug problems.

And I don't think the public are being lied to, the effects aren't really exaggerated as much as they should be, and it needs to be embedded into people from the earliest possible ages.

This sentence contradicts itself. First you say people aren't being lied to, then you say the effects are exaggerated and should be exaggerated even further. You do see the problem with your logic?
There's no point saying something is more harmful than it is. If the actual effects of heroin are not enough to scare someone away from using it, then they deserve to get [censored] up by it (of course the public should be fully educated about ACTUAL effects). You can't babysit the world.


1) Build a time machine, discover the secret of immortality, travel back to the middle ages with advanced tech
2) Declare myself god-emperor of man kind.

I read a book like this by Mark Twain, it was called A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. Darn good comedy.
User avatar
naomi
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:58 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:12 pm

1. No idea. I guess I could become an omnipotent deity that was strangely obsessed with doing everything via legal systems instead of god-powers.

2. I'd focus government resources on colonizing the moon and other planets, theraqeutic cloning technologies, and technologies that would allow the growth of human embryos and fetuses outside of the environment of the female body.

I'd strictly regulate industrial emissions and mandate new MPG standards in the Americas.

I'd incentivize the development, acquisition and use of non-gasoline based motor vehicles.

I'd institute policies to encourage veterinarians to work in rural areas with farm animals.

I would ban homeowner associations.

I would overhaul the education system, with policies changes aimed at improving graduation rates, increasing student involvement in extra-curricular activities, and increasing student involvement in class room activities. Less "sitting still and quiet while teacher lectures" and more discussions, active class participation in learning the material, and performance competitions between students in order to incentivize studying.

I would overhaul domestic and sixual abuse laws to ensure that the legal system is properly equipped to arrest and prosecute both female and male abusers. I would also ensure that DV shelters housed both male victims of domestic abuse and the teenage male children of domestic abuse victims.

I would see if I could get people with the means to reproduce via cloning, and have their clones reproduce by cloning, so that you would have snobbish "clone lineages" that prided themselves on being however many generations long while being nearly genetically identical to one guy or gal. I would also see if I could get these types to act even more snobbish if they weren't just cloning in order to reproduce, but also getting the genetic material for future clones from the corpse of either the original person or of a clone that was very early in the lineage. There's not really any point in this one, I just want to know if I can turn cloning into a source of elitism.
User avatar
KU Fint
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 4:00 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:31 pm

1) Use armies of lolis to take over the world
2) Kill everyone that isn't a loli and live life peacefully with my harem.
User avatar
Beulah Bell
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:08 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:07 am

Brilliant idea!

I meant things like thermal helicopters. They could vilolate people's privacy...

Things like that are already used, basically because of all the heat that weed farms need, those houses give off the most heat in an area and thus makes it detectable by the cameras and the police.

This sentence contradicts itself. First you say people aren't being lied to, then you say the effects are exaggerated and should be exaggerated even further. You do see the problem with your logic?
There's no point saying something is more harmful than it is. If the actual effects of heroin are not enough to scare someone away from using it, then they deserve to get [censored] up by it (of course the public should be fully educated about ACTUAL effects). You can't babysit the world.




I read a book like this, it was called A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. Darn good comedy.

Yeah I suppose it is contradictory, I mean that basically people are just told the actual affects, and not exaggerated really. I suppose the best way to tackle it is to tackle production of drugs and not the use of it, or something like that. And nobody deserves to be [censored] up by heroin.
User avatar
Vickey Martinez
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:57 am

1. Love and Peace
2. Total Annihilation
User avatar
Pete Schmitzer
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 8:20 am

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:06 pm

Well no offense but some of these ideas are unconstitutional.

"Location: Liverpool, UK"
User avatar
Ray
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:17 am

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:14 am

Set Research to 66%
User avatar
louise hamilton
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:16 am

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:03 am

Things like that are already used, basically because of all the heat that weed farms need, those houses give off the most heat in an area and thus makes it detectable by the cameras and the police.



Yeah I suppose it is contradictory, I mean that basically people are just told the actual affects, and not exaggerated really. I suppose the best way to tackle it is to tackle production of drugs and not the use of it, or something like that. And nobody deserves to be [censored] up by heroin.

They just measure the electricity bill. If it's insanely high, they will check out the location. For example, a group of warehouses in the B.C. Rockies had a huge electricity bill, turns out they were growing weed. But heat lamps aren't needed in warmer climates. And no nobody DESERVES to get [censored] up by heroin, but they will and you can't stop that. It's ultimately their decision, not yours.
User avatar
Andres Lechuga
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:47 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:39 am

The last thing the world needs is teens boasting about weed and thinking they are cool about it.
Yeah, but this would actually minimise that. It would be as commonplace as having a beer, which is certainly not impressive.
User avatar
Matt Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:48 am

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:02 pm

1. Delete all money
2. Resource Based Economy
3. Problem solved

:banana:
User avatar
Philip Lyon
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:08 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games