» Tue May 15, 2012 1:41 am
If you ask me, saying something is a "Ghost" is almost the same thing as calling something a "UFO." (Or at least, I feel it should be classified in rather the same manner.) A lot of people forget that a UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Saucer. But I come across that a lot (it seems quite often on the History Channel,) where a "UFO expert," upon exhausting all other possibilities, will call that "proof" that said UFO is an alien spaceship. Which, obviously, is a scientifically fallacious conclusion. It only means it continues to be unidentified.
I feel the same way about ghosts, really. I rather think there might be something to it. In the same way that many UFOs are gas, lights, aircraft, atmospheric phenomena, etc; yet some still can't yet be fully explained - yes, many (or even most) ghost sightings can be explained away as hallucinations, waking nightmares, electromagnetic fluctuations, that this still doesn't categorically disprove that "something" isn't happening.
Interestingly, somewhere I believe I came across some studies of waking nightmares that explained a lot of alien abduction experiences, ghostly encounters, and even demonic possession and attacks (and even a couple people whose experiences changed over time from one to other.)
That's not to say that I 100% believe that a "ghost" is evidence of an afterlife, or even that one would in any way necessarily attribute it to anything other than "something unexplained." I just think there's a lot of stuff we don't know, and that there might be something to this, whether it be just in one's head, or what, I certainly wouldn't presume to know in every case, categorically.
Of course, I am a little bit biased. I've actually seen a few "ghosts" in my time, and had other unexplained phenomena. But I tend to kind of leave it at that. What I experienced in each case was simply something that I can't explain. To the extent that anyone can say with any certainty, I'm pretty sure none of them were hallucinations. There could be other explanations in each case for what I experienced, but at this point they're simply "unsolved mysteries." I don't see it as any conclusive proof of any sort of afterlife, and posit no guesses as to what they actually "are" in any sense (I'm a confirmed agnostic, so it's all just a big question mark as far as I'm concerned.)
Anyway, that tends to be my take on it. I know what I've experienced in my own life. Thus far, scientific methods haven't been able to explain what happened to me. I firmly believe, however, that a scientific explanation could exist. But I don't presume to know what that would be.