Capcom releasing unreplayable game

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 3:18 am

There are plenty of DS and 3DS games where you can't delete unlocks, this is nothing new.

Which doesn't make it any less bad... going back to how gamers refuse to vote with their wallet and get screwed over.
User avatar
.X chantelle .x Smith
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:25 pm

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:51 am

Since when? Some of the best fighters with one of the most dedicated followings in gaming, arguably reviving the genre's mainstream appeal with SFIV. Mega Man, Devil May Cry, Resident Evil, etc. Some of the premier gaming franchises right there.


I can honestly say that I don't really care much for any of those titles. I don't like fighting games period, and the others are just pale shadows of games that might have been good once I suppose. They haven't really done much as a company lately to deserve my attention, aside from DRM scandals apparently. I don't think I've ever owned a single Capcom game...
User avatar
Stacey Mason
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:18 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:40 am

There is no "starting over". As usual the gaming boulevard press and the gullible gamers are blowing this way out of proportion. But hey you need stupid [censored] people can argue about so you get hits on your site.
This game doesn't have one coherent story or one long campaign. It just features a ton of stuff to unlock, and basically you can't "delete" maps, characters and item's that you've already unlocked.

So it's not "oh you finished the game now you have to throw it away and buy a new copy", as people make it appear to be.

Okay, I'm confused, you seem to imply there is a misunderstanding as to what it is. Genuinely honest question : can I lend the game to my nephews so that they start fresh ? Can I pick up the game a few years later when I don't remember, and have a new go at it ?

If I can't do either of those things, whether or not stuff like that are already done, that's bad practice.
User avatar
Matt Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:48 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:00 am

Okay, I'm confused, you seem to imply there is a misunderstanding as to what it is. Genuinely honest question : can I lend the game to my nephews so that they start fresh ? Can I pick up the game a few years later when I don't remember, and have a new go at it ?

If I can't do either of those things, whether or not stuff like that are already done, that's bad practice.

Like said, mercenaries has no real story or campaign. Imagine it more like Tetris (with guns) or something like that. It's just a bunch of self contained time limited missions. Imagine it like unlocking new maps on mario kart or unlocking a new character in street fighter.
Would you wanna delete those unlocks just to go through the entire grind to unlock them again? 99% would not. The [censored] would I ever want to delete my save data on Soul Calibur, because unlocking all that [censored] is a [censored].

People saying it's "unplayable" or it "can only be played once" is [censored].
User avatar
Cody Banks
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:30 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:12 am

Reminds me of DIVX.
User avatar
TRIsha FEnnesse
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:59 am

Post » Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:46 pm

Like said, mercenaries has no real story or campaign. Imagine it more like Tetris (with guns) or something like that. It's just a bunch of self contained time limited missions. Imagine it like unlocking new maps on mario kart or unlocking a new character in street fighter.
Would you wanna delete those unlocks just to go through the entire grind to unlock them again? 99% would not. The [censored] would I ever want to delete my save data on Soul Calibur, because unlocking all that [censored] is a [censored].

Then how is this accomplishing anything at all other than trolling a lot of people?
User avatar
Guinevere Wood
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:06 pm

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:32 am

Then how is this accomplishing anything at all other than trolling a lot of people?

Well of course it's a move aimed straightly at reselling (it also has the nice side effect though that idiot little cousins or friends don't accidently delete your unlocked [censored] :) ). Nobody is arguing that.
But saying it renders the game unplayable for someone who buys an original copy is complete and utter [censored].

My point is people need to get their facts straight and not just blindly listen to the overblown [censored] posted on gaming boulevard sites like Kotaku and what not. They post these headlines because gullible people eat that [censored] up and give them the hits they want.

People are not rationally discussing this, most people posting here probably weren't even interested in getting Mercenaries. It's just typical pitchfork mentality.
User avatar
cheryl wright
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:43 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:26 am

I'm not concerned with the game's contents or quality. It's their attempt to wipe out used games that irritates me. The game companies have been trying to do it for a while ( Steam for example ) and this is just showing that we're not putting up enough of a fight. If we were, they wouldn't insult us with such a ridiculous system.
User avatar
anna ley
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:04 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:51 am

I can see the results for the review now:

Grahics: 8
Audio: 7
Gameplay: 7.5
Replay value: 0

Overall average Score: 5.6
User avatar
Cameron Wood
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:01 pm

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:45 am

I'm not concerned with the game's contents or quality. It's their attempt to wipe out used games that irritates me. The game companies have been trying to do it for a while ( Steam for example ) and this is just showing that we're not putting up enough of a fight. If we were, they wouldn't insult us with such a ridiculous system.

It's good that you point this out, considering how many of the people here are ravenous fans of steam. Steam is infinitely worse in terms of reselling :)

Wanna yell at someone? Yell at digital distribution. This [censored] is small time in comparison.
User avatar
X(S.a.R.a.H)X
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:38 pm

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:58 am

I can see the results for the review now:

Grahics: 8
Audio: 7
Gameplay: 7.5
Replay value: 0

Overall average Score: 5.6
:lmao:
User avatar
Calum Campbell
 
Posts: 3574
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:55 am

Post » Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:00 pm

Would you wanna delete those unlocks just to go through the entire grind to unlock them again? 99% would not.


I'm proud to say that i belong to the 1% that does just that :D
User avatar
Sebrina Johnstone
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:58 pm

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:42 am

Like said, mercenaries has no real story or campaign. Imagine it more like Tetris (with guns) or something like that. It's just a bunch of self contained time limited missions. Imagine it like unlocking new maps on mario kart or unlocking a new character in street fighter.
Would you wanna delete those unlocks just to go through the entire grind to unlock them again? 99% would not. The [censored] would I ever want to delete my save data on Soul Calibur, because unlocking all that [censored] is a [censored].

People saying it's "unplayable" or it "can only be played once" is [censored].

Hmmm, got it (sorry, it's like 35°C here, not the right temp to understand a second language). Still, while I can get it it's not much a bother for the type of games you mention (doesn't prevent to replay, you just replay with more choices, all the stuff you unlocked), you do concede it's a move designed to make a used game unsellable. Then what prevents them to do the same thing for another type of game, for instance, an instalment of Okami? You can replay, but all the weapons you got stay got. Tried that kind of second-replay with the PS2 game, that got boring quickly.
User avatar
jessica robson
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:54 am

Post » Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:23 pm

I'm torn on the whole used game sale issue. It's great for consumers, but terrible for publishers and by extension developers. As someone who hopes to one day be a developer, i can't really get behind used games sale in it's current form.

This though, this is [censored] ridiculous. I can't say it any other way, this tactic is laughably stupid. Effective yes, but also a surefire way to piss off your customers, and newsflash: These are the people you want to give you their money. People who don't like you rarely give you money. I can see how that'd be hard to grasp...
User avatar
matt oneil
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:54 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 2:20 am

Hmmm, got it (sorry, it's like 35°C here, not the right temp to understand a second language). Still, while I can get it it's not much a bother for the type of games you mention (doesn't prevent to replay, you just replay with more choices, all the stuff you unlocked), you do concede it's a move designed to make a used game unsellable. Then what prevents them to do the same thing for another type of game, for instance, an instalment of Okami? You can replay, but all the weapons you got stay got. Tried that kind of second-replay with the PS2 game, that got boring quickly.

The temp is [censored] killing me today :)

Well think of it more like a multiplayer game that is tied to an account like Call of Duty or Team Fortress, where you can select unlocked perks, weapons etc before a mission. That is how it's setup. It's not a campaign or story mode like the main Resident Evil series.
User avatar
Liv Staff
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:51 pm

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:21 am

Wow that's Royally (Censored) Stupid. I think I'll boycott any future games from them (Including Dragon's Dogma) until they get some common sense and apologize for what they have done and promise not to do it again.

Used games are great I don't understand why so many people are against them. If I wanted to buy a game like let's say Oblivion I should be able to buy a used copy. I doubt I'll be able to find a new copy of Oblivion this many years after it came out.
User avatar
Katie Pollard
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:23 pm

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 3:03 am

Wow that's Royally (Censored) Stupid. I think I'll boycott any future games from them (Including Dragon's Dogma) until they get some common sense and apologize for what they have done and promise not to do it again.

Used games are great I don't understand why so many people are against them. If I wanted to buy a game like let's say Oblivion I should be able to buy a used copy. I doubt I'll be able to find a new copy of Oblivion this many years after it came out.

Dev and publishers hate it because they don't profit from it all. All money goes to the store.
User avatar
XPidgex Jefferson
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 4:39 pm

Post » Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:59 pm

I'll care when a company that publishes good games adopts this strategy.
User avatar
Stacyia
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:48 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:06 am

Dev and publishers hate it because they don't profit from it all. All money goes to the store.

So I don't see a problem with that. Companies like Gamestop are a business and they need to make money. This situation that capcom put themselves in is a business killing move and I won't buy any of their future products until I get an apology and if I don't get one well I've got other places where I can spend my money.
User avatar
Eire Charlotta
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:00 pm

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:16 am

Anyway, this is terrible. Unfortunately the vast majority of gamers will just piss and moan right up to the counter where they buy it anyway, because games are more important to them than standing up for themselves.


I was thinking about getting it... Until I heard about this, not to mention it's basically a mini-game being sold for $40 USD.

So you know what? I'll get it used. Take that Capcom!

And hey, just means I unlock everything faster. :D
User avatar
saxon
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:45 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 8:28 am

I'll care when a company that publishes good games adopts this strategy.

Other publishers are concerned about used game sales too. If this proves to be succesful for Capcom then other publishers may well adopt it. I'm looking at you, Activision <_<
User avatar
liz barnes
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:10 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 2:17 am

Other publishers are concerned about used game sales too. If this proves to be succesful for Capcom then other publishers may well adopt it. I'm looking at you, Activision <_<

If that happens I'll boycott all of their future products even Bethesda. If I want to buy a game used I should be able too, publishers just need to deal with it.
User avatar
Lalla Vu
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:40 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:43 am

That is very stupid.
User avatar
Taylrea Teodor
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:20 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:47 am

Thats just dumb.....I mean it's a 3ds game :facepalm:
User avatar
Dylan Markese
 
Posts: 3513
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:58 am

Post » Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:31 am

The game needs a good amount of content if they want to do this. Fallout 3, GTAseries, ElderScrolls, are good examples.
User avatar
Chloe Yarnall
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:26 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games