About 12 years ago a few of my cousins and I started a group called the Skeptics. We researched old ghost stories and multiple murder sites and found the locations they took place. We would do tons of research and try to plan on the best time to visit. Typically it was a two or three day trip. We went to places like the badlands at Aza berango that stretch out to mexico, abandoned buildings and closed mental hospitals. We videotaped everything... We only did this for about two years until other things took us away form our hobby.
Apart from seeing and hearing odd things, over all it was actually fairly disappointing. The trips were fun and the exploring was awesome but overall not what we set out for. Then again we did call ourselves the skeptics. I guess we kinda set ourselves up for that one.
That's why I just can't understand things from a 100% skeptic point of view. For someone to say
uh-uh, no way, it is impossible, these witnesses are either lying or mistaken. Simply because the skeptic has never experienced it personally, so it must be ridiculous. Well, I've never seen a narwhal in real life myself.
So teams go out, take pictures of the area (as if that means something) re-interview witnesses, and try not to snicker (as if the interviews will change anything), and then hang out in the area that something happened - as if the ghost, UFO or bigfoot is going to show itself
again while the skeptic is tapping his foot.
I'm sure I could live in the arctic for a year and not see a narwhal.