Very well. They were and are exposed to radiation. What does it prove? That Astronauts have a much higher occupational radiation hazard? Even if they were exposed to intense space radiation, I fail to get how that somehow disproves the moon landing. It's not like being exposed to unfiltered x-rays will automatically cause you to keel over and die. Airline pilots who spend regular amounts of time in thin atmosphere (i.e. significantly reduced electromagnetic filtering) have the same occupational hazards, although to a lesser degree.

I bet if you were to do an anolysis of long-term health of astronauts, you'd find their medical records align with the increased exposure to radiation. But increased exposure to radiation does not automatically mean health problems. It means increased chances of health problems. It certainly doesn't mean automatic fatality.

I dunno man..there's a lotta green cheese up there. You can't mobilize a massive army without food.

http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax-jw.htm

Not really...


Besides, I think at some point somebody would notice that the moon suddenly had a giant cannon on it...

If we never landed on the moon..then where did Liberty Prime fight Space Godzilla and crush the commies? Are you telling me that the radio program that comes on at 1 am every morning is a lie?

Yea it's just the moon. We don't use it for anything else since there is nothing up there. Maybe when the Zorgs invade it can be a base

Well I give up then. If anyone cares to read it, you'll see lots of proof why the moon landing conspiracy is a load of crap.

Only on Tuesdays... Only on Tuesdays.

I suppose so, though I'm not actually going to read that, I've already seen enough proof to support my opinion on the matter (that it wasn't faked).

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread543473/pg1

If you're talking about the conspiracy saying that we did not land there, then I agree, that is a load of crap.

I'm not sure why anyone even started this thing, what does disproving the moonlanding accomplish except making an ass of yourself?

Well of course not, it was more for Romascu and any other fence sitters.



Yeah, that's what I meant. I'm not some nutty conspiracy theorist, if I was somehow unclear.

Well then we agree. And yeah, I'm not saying the message on the site is somehow less valid because of the sites design. But I have trouble getting interested in a site when it's obvious no effort went into the site's design.

I am not unreasonable,i doubted the 9/11 thing,but since i was shown concrete solid proof i accepted it.

If you show me proof you got me on your side(generally speaking).

I'm just saying I was curious as to how they were able to stay healthy considering there were a large amount of people exposed to radiation. I have read that most of the astronauts do in fact have early stages of cataracts, this however is what was odd to me. They didn't have any other health problems.

It would be an argument against the moon landing because they would as you say, have increased chances of health problems not just early stages of cataracts. The minimal amount of radiation that they were exposed to on earth in the space stations could have just as well caused the cataracts.

Like I said earlier, I'm not one way or the other. I'm just posing questions.

It's pretty safe to assume the money going to NASA is being used well. I can't claim to know for sure about anything like that, though, because I do my absolute best to avoid knowing about it. Politics and the economy bore me to tears. Besides, [censored]ing and moaning about it isn't going to magically lower my taxes. :shrug: Anyway, these "the moon landing was a hoax" claims sound pretty ridiculous to me. Makes about as much sense as 9/11 being part of Bush's evil plan.

You are not a nutty conspiracy theorist , which is good. At least you put up some good proof for that it was fake.
In my opinion I don't care if it was or not. Even though It makes me want to go up in space like Cowboy Bebop......well I got x3 that should handle the pain for now

In the end does it matter really?

Nope, not in the slightest.

It shows how much we've progressed,and what to expect in the future.

Thirded. Contact with the moon or not, I'm just going to sit back and play video games. To the Playstation!

Both of the sites were made in the early 2000's, so I don't blame them for having fairly basic designs.

Have you even been reading the posts here giving you solid proof that it wasn't faked?

Words cannot describe how mind numbingly infuriating this type of thinking is to me, or how tragic more people don't hate apathy as much as I do. How could it possibly not matter? How could you POSSIBLY not care? It's one thing to believe wrongly but to not even [censored] care? That attitude is the vile cancer that is killing our culture.

That didn't even occur to me actually, so nevermind that then.

At any rate, there's plenty of solid proof here to support that the moonlanding was in fact real.


Thanks, I try

Seriously though, it doesn't matter. If I show you a chair and you insist it's a table, will that somehow change the fact that it's really a chair? No. So why argue with you or try to convince you? Your opinion won't change the facts.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'll continue murdering culture.

It shows how much we've progressed,and what to expect in the future.