Google Glasses

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 3:49 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9c6W4CCU9M4


Whats everyone's thought on this? They already have monitors replacing windows so it was just a matter of time something such as this would happen.
User avatar
Jason White
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:54 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:25 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3TAOYXT840
User avatar
Charleigh Anderson
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:17 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 10:17 am

*future news report*

"This marks the end of the first week of Google's Augmented Reality glasses. The product has been a huge success due to various hardware vendor partnerships and has seen surprisingly high sales for such a new product."

"In unrelated news, car accidents across the globe are up 5000%"
User avatar
Ice Fire
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:27 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:56 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3TAOYXT840

That is sooo funny. people can't even walk and text at the same time without hurting themselves. Just think about all of the advertising one would have to watch.
User avatar
Ice Fire
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:27 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 1:51 pm

Until From Beyond occurs.
User avatar
~Amy~
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:38 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:23 pm

idk i kind of like the idea, although personally i don't even use smart phones so i don't know that it would actually be worth spending hard dough on. since i doubt it would be cheap if it were ever realized.
User avatar
Mashystar
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:24 am

If done correctly, I think these would be amazing - and if priced right, I'd buy a pair. As long as the interface is very minimalist while retaining functionality - and no advertisemants, of course - these could be very useful.

Of course, ocular implants would be preferable. :P
User avatar
Bek Rideout
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:00 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 9:56 am

I have stuff like this on my phone and my computer. I don't need it in my face all the time.
User avatar
Add Meeh
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 8:09 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 3:30 pm

Then come Google Contacts.....
User avatar
flora
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:48 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:12 am

Terrible. I like it just the way it is on my smartphone. I don't want it integrated on my eyeballs.
User avatar
John N
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:11 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 12:48 pm

What if someone already needs glasses,?
User avatar
CORY
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:45 pm

http://www.globalresearch.ca/coverStoryPictures/14249.jpg
User avatar
Liii BLATES
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:16 pm

Terrible. I like it just the way it is on my smartphone. I don't want it integrated on my eyeballs.
QFT. As novel as it may seem, it really is rather unpractical to have things popping up all over your eyes.

Also the world would be pretty weird with everyone talking to themselves.
User avatar
Andrew Perry
 
Posts: 3505
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:40 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 5:48 pm

Also the world would be pretty weird with everyone talking to themselves.
They already do. A few years ago if you saw people with their hand to their ear talking to themselves you would have thought them mad - now they are everywhere, walking down the street, in the supermarkest, in the bars. Google glasses, or a future derivative of them, will eventually seem normal.
User avatar
Steve Smith
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:47 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:51 pm

They had better make it look cool. I wanna look like Geordi or Something.
User avatar
Rachell Katherine
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:21 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 4:34 pm

Maybe on a window, not in glasses. I couldn't stand having words that close to my eyes. Something I would buy is a contacts or glasses that take pictures on command. Or a bionic eyeball that can zoom in and out.
User avatar
Jack Moves
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:34 am

I hope they rename it to "googly eyes"...
User avatar
Maya Maya
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:35 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 3:46 pm

This looks a bit stupid, imo. Won't these glasses damage our eyesight in the long run? Also, electronic devices so close to the eyes... just sounds wrong. What if there's a shortcircuit?
User avatar
Kat Lehmann
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:24 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 4:48 pm

I would rather have an Omni-tool.....
User avatar
Jonny
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:04 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 1:43 pm

Reminds me of a mix of Deus Ex and the EyePhone from Futurama
User avatar
Eire Charlotta
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:00 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 12:45 pm

Hey yo Google! Yeah You! Stop coming up with stupid [censored]! :tongue:
But seriously, they have some of the best marketers in the world. Can you believe they actually almost had me believing this is a good idea for the first few seconds???
User avatar
Vahpie
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:07 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 4:09 pm

I have fairly bad myopia, and wear contacts that make anything within a couple inches of my face blurry, so I'm pretty sure this wouldn't work for me.

Not like I'd want it anyway. Do people really need social networking glued to their eyeballs? Are we that desperate for attention? Some of the stuff it could do, like maps, weather, phone calls would be useful, especially for businessmen and the like, but does anyone really need it literally right in his face?
User avatar
Adrian Morales
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:19 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:37 am

This looks a bit stupid, imo. Won't these glasses damage our eyesight in the long run? Also, electronic devices so close to the eyes... just sounds wrong. What if there's a shortcircuit?
It depends on how the display works, really. If you have to constantly strain to see the picture or if it uses a bright light or something like that, then yeah, I can see it being bad for your eyes. Mind you, I'm not an eye doctor, so I have no idea if there's some risk there that I don't know about.

However, I don't think a device that small would have enough current running through it to do any real damage to you in a short circuit unless someone invents Fallout-style microfusion cells between now and then. The most you'd ever be likely to get is a minor burn unless a faulty battery somehow leaked onto you, and that's a small risk with any electronic device.
User avatar
Jesus Duran
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 6:53 am

I'd definitely be up for trying out a pair. I have my phone and my http://www.wimm.com/ already, and I wear glasses all the time. I'm also not terribly clumsy. :P

They could (rather easily) add in an accelerometer that would only show the screen when a person is standing still, which would negate (most) of the people smacking their heads into poles.
User avatar
Alexandra Louise Taylor
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:48 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:43 am

Kinda neat idea I guess---unless you're not paying attention to where you going and slip down a manhole or walk off a cliff.
User avatar
Justin Bywater
 
Posts: 3264
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:44 pm

Next

Return to Othor Games