IGN Says Bethesda's "Golden Reputation Is Tarnished"

Post » Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:29 pm

So the majority of ppl don't have too many issues if any......yet Bethesda has a bad rep now?

I'm one of those ppl who side with the PS3 gamers that have lag issues, but ignoring the fact that there are 2 other platforms that have good outcomes is just an attention getting plan.

PS3 and PC are about as buggy as each other so its only one that is actually decent right now.

But BGS svcks at optimizing always has let alone bug control.
User avatar
Amber Hubbard
 
Posts: 3537
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:59 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 2:38 am

It is not IGN making ignorant statements with obviously no knowledge of what the discussion is and/or a blatant ignoring of the actual topic at hand just to post uselessness, apologetic defenses, and demands of so-called "patience" in a context within which what they're demanding is stupid and irrational. This is a corporation we're dealing with, not a charity that releases something for free out of the goodness of their heart... a rich, supposedly AAA corporation that shouldn't let these things slip by, at that.


I appreciate and understand that their is PS3 issues and I feel sorry for them but IGN claiming that a golden reputation is tarnished? that is Ignorant, the fact not one single game company has a golden reputation because no game is perfect neither is the company. Its not the only ignorant statement they have made either.
User avatar
Oceavision
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:52 am

Post » Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:54 pm

I appreciate and understand that their is PS3 issues and I feel sorry for them but IGN claiming that a golden reputation is tarnished? that is Ignorant, the fact not one single game company has a golden reputation because no game is perfect neither is the company. Its not the only ignorant statement they have made either.
You're right, Bethesda never had a golden reputation and I apologize, but their PS reputation, regardless of its former status, has certainly been damaged by the ordeal... not entirely ruined as not everyone will experience issues, care much, or even be aware of this episode, but I'd argue the PS3 version of Skyrim is the worst-performing Bethesda game post Daggerfall. Regardless, within the AAA gaming industry, with a company with as much money as Bethesda who I firmly believed rushed the game for 11/11/11 release date, this shouldn't be happening.
User avatar
Jonny
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:04 am

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:36 am

Did no one watch the video? That was a glowing review. :foodndrink:
User avatar
Angelina Mayo
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:58 am

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:57 am

I didn't think their reputation was so golden to begin with.

This and ...

IGN gave Empire Total war a glowing review despite a plethora of bugs and a horrible AI.

Who really cares what IGN thinks on these matters? I find their reviews only really useful for indy games which they don't worry about advertising dollars. Does IGN call out TESV over all the bugs and consolitis? No. If it weren't for a major hardware issue they wouldn't have even paused.
User avatar
Queen of Spades
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:06 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:51 am

http://games.ign.com/articles/121/1214789p1.html

Scroll down to #10
I'm pretty sure IGN's golden reputation has been tarnished, so do we really care?
User avatar
Alisha Clarke
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:53 am

Post » Sat Jun 02, 2012 7:45 pm

Fix your grammar, please? "I here was me" does not make sense.

Generally, when someone is a non-native English speaker, you let them slide on a minor mistake. Unless of course, you are a jack-ass.

Exactly. High quality and full of bugs is an oxygen moron. Bugthesda failed.

while I don't disagree with your sentiment, feel that the issue with the PS3 is something that does deserve proper addressing and that Beth should be held more accountable for their actions.

you are an utterly tiresome cretin now-a-days with these weak articles.
User avatar
Latino HeaT
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:21 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:24 am

Complacency is a terrible thing so if it gives Beth a kick up the backside then we all profit.

this, something many people refuse to realize. if beth ever had some golden reputation it is nothing but good for us that it be tarnished because that means they have to work to get it back to golden. we all know beth games to be pretty buggy, but this is the most popular release that was somehow allowed to be released buggier than any other game. the niche demographic of morrowind and the massively populous demographic of skyrim demand entirely different things: they could get away with buggy as s**t before, but if beth wants to play with the big boys they better polish their games.

how you can you people discount and insult morrowind as an artifact of nostalgia but be fine with the same low standard of bug testing for 10 years? sounds pretty hypocritical to me...
User avatar
Lucy
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:55 am

Post » Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:22 pm

Wait, Bethesda's rep is tarnished by Bugs? Really? Like...there weren't bugs in previous TES games. Give me a break. People expect bugs in a game as big as skyrim.
User avatar
Roisan Sweeney
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:28 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:13 am

You're right, Bethesda never had a golden reputation and I apologize, but their PS reputation, regardless of its former status, has certainly been damaged by the ordeal... not entirely ruined as not everyone will experience issues, care much, or even be aware of this episode, but I'd argue the PS3 version of Skyrim is the worst-performing Bethesda game post Daggerfall. Regardless, within the AAA gaming industry, with a company with as much money as Bethesda who I firmly believed rushed the game for 11/11/11 release date, this shouldn't be happening.

I believe the game was rushed for the PS3 but not the others. apparantly the PS3 is notoriously hard to program for and I think it was even Bethesda I heard it off but I suppose thats no excuse, I havn't played it but the Lag issues sound horrible, I play on 360 but really want to play on PC for Mods. But yes the lag issue needs to fixed, hell I even think this needs to be fixed before the 360's texture issues and that comes from a 360 player.
User avatar
P PoLlo
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:05 am

Post » Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:56 pm

Since when has Beth had a "golden reputation" to begin with? Not to put down what Beth has done, they make fun games and great worlds, but they are also always full of bugs and their PC/PS3 ports are consistently terrible. I can think of maybe a handful of developers that I would consider having a "golden reputation" but I'd never have included Beth among them despite how much I've played and enjoyed their games.
User avatar
Jimmie Allen
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:39 am

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:09 am

Since when has Beth had a "golden reputation" to begin with? Not to put down what Beth has done, they make fun games and great worlds, but they are also always full of bugs and their PC/PS3 ports are consistently terrible. I can think of maybe a handful of developers that I would consider having a "golden reputation" but I'd never have included Beth among them despite how much I've played and enjoyed their games.
Maybe they shouldn't port them then.
User avatar
Riky Carrasco
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:17 am

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:57 am

Give me a break. People expect bugs in a game as big as skyrim.

what ?
I for one dont accept bugs in my games,and if they are "expected" then i expect a reduction in price.

i dont expect flys in my chicken curry and chips,just as i dont expect bugs in my games.

bugs are never to be expected,unless you are happy with sub par performance and quality ?
this is probably why bethesda releases knowing the bugs will be whitewashed over by thier own customers.

forums fools saying "its not broken" for so many years has put bethesda into a business plan of releasing broken conveyor belt games that they leave to modders to fix ?
and they say complainers wreck the games industry ?
User avatar
Elina
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:09 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 8:38 am

Maybe they shouldn't port them then.

And lose over half their sales? Haha, yeah ok.....
User avatar
Alisha Clarke
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:53 am

Post » Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:25 pm

No time to read that article, I'm too busy playing Skyrim.
User avatar
Nick Pryce
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:49 am

And lose over half their sales? Haha, yeah ok.....
Yes you are right, they will just keep robbing the people out of there money. Of course if people were smart they would just stop buying games from them.
User avatar
Amy Melissa
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 2:35 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:13 am

Wait, Bethesda's rep is tarnished by Bugs? Really? Like...there weren't bugs in previous TES games. Give me a break. People expect bugs in a game as big as skyrim.

people like you are the reason the video game industry has gone to hell.
User avatar
Cash n Class
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:01 am

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 8:13 am

This is coming from IGN, whose reputation is more of infamy than anything positive. Anyone ever heard of "You can't spell ignorant without IGN"? Yup, people say that for a reason.
User avatar
carly mcdonough
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 3:23 am

Post » Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:39 pm

what ?
I for one dont accept bugs in my games,and if they are "expected" then i expect a reduction in price.

i dont expect flys in my chicken curry and chips,just as i dont expect bugs in my games.

bugs are never to be expected,unless you are happy with sub par performance and quality ?
this is probably why bethesda releases knowing the bugs will be whitewashed over by thier own customers.

forums fools saying "its not broken" for so many years has put bethesda into a business plan of releasing broken conveyor belt games that they leave to modders to fix ?
and they say complainers wreck the games industry ?


Oh please god, dont say that!!! These die hard beth fans will freak out..
but you said the truth
User avatar
El Khatiri
 
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:43 am

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:32 am

Their reputation for puting out issue-free games was never "Golden"
User avatar
Arrogant SId
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:39 am

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:25 am

That was seriously a 'top moment in gaming'?

Lulwut?

And in the 'Top 10' no less. Derp IGN derp.
User avatar
Lil Miss
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:57 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:44 am

Wait, Bethesda's rep is tarnished by Bugs? Really? Like...there weren't bugs in previous TES games. Give me a break. People expect bugs in a game as big as skyrim.

its people like you who have ruined the videogame industry. if you pay top dollar for a game you should get top quality product. end of story. only a complete moron would be happy paying top dollar for a half finished product, because they are too stupid to know any better. yes bugs will happen, but the amount of bugs/glitches and other problems that skyrim has are completely unacceptable.
User avatar
meghan lock
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:26 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:37 am

Of course if people were smart they would just stop buying games from them.

And folks will eventually. Skyrim had some pretty huge sales on PC, with as bad as the PC port was I'd say they'll be hard pressed to repeat that on their next game. I didn't even expect much from the PC version give the fact that Beth is a console developer and knowing how bad their previous 2 PC ports were, but they failed to reach even those already pessimistic expectations.
User avatar
Francesca
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:26 pm

Post » Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:21 pm

its people like you who have ruined the videogame industry. if you pay top dollar for a game you should get top quality product. end of story. only a complete moron would be happy paying top dollar for a half finished product, because they are too stupid to know any better.

I think the blame lies more on production companies like Ubisoft, EA, etc. Deadlines are deadlines.
User avatar
Richard
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:50 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:43 am

what ?
I for one dont accept bugs in my games,and if they are "expected" then i expect a reduction in price.

i dont expect flys in my chicken curry and chips,just as i dont expect bugs in my games.

bugs are never to be expected,unless you are happy with sub par performance and quality ?
this is probably why bethesda releases knowing the bugs will be whitewashed over by thier own customers.

forums fools saying "its not broken" for so many years has put bethesda into a business plan of releasing broken conveyor belt games that they leave to modders to fix ?
and they say complainers wreck the games industry ?
lol You should expect bugs in every game.
User avatar
Charles Weber
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:14 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim