http://www.bookdepository.com/book/9781848375369/The-Complete-Book-of-Drawing by Barrington Barber is supposed to be very good, covering just about everything, and being useful for the basics through to an intermediate level. It does cost money, but its only half that of a new game (or a quarter, in some regions), and will last longer, develop a useful skill, and be usable anywhere you're willing to lug it (plus, a physical resource has noticeable advantages over the internet when it comes to things like drawing).
I got ninja'ed ina artsy-fartsy thread about an art book ref???
Hey Sami... eat my shorts :swear:
really good book though :goodjob:
and Sami... please don't eat my shorts, 'kay buddy? :biggrin:
I need 'em :hehe:
What do nipbles ever have to do with Japan?? Other than not ever being drawn correctly..
oh wait..
:teehee:
I'm doing it because I like how it looks.
Oh well crap son, why didn't you say so at the beginning?? And here we all are -or at least I was, worried like hell that you were out there drawing stuff that you didn't wanna draw..
..while I was going to propose using a playboy, penthouse, hustler or other nature / wildlife magazine to capture the inherent beauty of the female form in all it's photoshopped splendor.
no to mention some great proportions :hubbahubba:
as to the yay/nee manga debate.. I'm gonna sit squarely between Antibody and Expersate on the whole matter.. cuz they're both right.
yes.., they are.
my cedentials; three years of study over a five year period at these two places when I wasn't on deployment.. I needed something to noodle
http://www.hku.nl/web/show
http://www.gerritrietveldacademie.nl/nl/
Ex is right that you can 'use' manga drawing techniques to get a handle on things like basic human proportions; the small child, the teen, the young advlt etc.. -but only as a guideline since manga by it's nature is cartoonesk. Manga is also great in practicing dynamic movement and posing, since it doesn't deal too deeply with shading and proper anatomical definition, just the outlines.
AB is right, via proxy of his professors, that the classic disciplines of shading, learning to work from the negative space, color palette, contrast and an understanding through art history of how things like composition and perspective evolved into works like http://www.google.com/search?q=nachtwacht&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=1440&bih=698 and a http://www.google.com/search?q=pindakaasvloer&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=1440&bih=698 are equally important, and if you're a professor at a renown institute of the arts, or a student of one such professor, then it's more than understandable that this is your defended point of view.
:)