It is true that Esbern even makes more internal sense.
Esbern was marketed before release as a pivotal character. I just do not get that.
The man is a joke. You could do everything without him if the main quest only allowed you to skip the whole Thalmor red herring.
Sheesh and I thought Oblivion had poor delivery. Delphine? Superfluous, there for plot delivery, deus ex.
I love TES a lot but even I am struggling to make anything passable of this mess.
It is just a poor storyline, poorly delivered.
These days people know how to build a story. Its not a secret. There really is no actual excuse to like this apart from being a real fan. Skyrim.. no, it does not have a good story.
Besides my disappointment with Delphine and Esbern, my only bone to pick with Skyrim's MQ is that the dragons are undeniably evil, when there have been little to no accounts of dragons ever behaving in such a manner. Even when dragons are described as being offensive like in Five Songs where Wulfharth is described rebuilding the 418'th step of High Hrothgar after a dragon attack, it's nowhere near indicative of an organized army of evil dragons. The only one was Alduin if I'm not mistaken.
Also as much as I love having the Thu'um it feels like a stretch to have it originate as the Dragon language when again the only evidence pre-Skyrim was that it was associated with Ysmir at one time. It was Shor's Tongue, was it not? Shor had the Thu'um, and Shor was no dragon, at least not a racial dragon like the ones in Skyrim. At most he had a mythic dragon form, like Akatosh, but flesh and blood dragon? Definitely not.
If someone, after the Oblivion release was to ask what Thu'um was after reading Five Songs and then go on to say,
"Ysmir had Thu'um, and he was a dragon, so is Thu'um the language of dragons? Maybe the dragons taught the Nords how to use Thu'um."
He'd have been laughed off the forums. Or ridiculed off if Proweler got there first.
Geez this makes me look like I hate the game, which I don't.