Incredible.
It's this kind of reasoning that sometimes scares me. A lot. Now personally I enjoy the Paarthunax dilemma in this game, but I don't feel passionately enough to argue about it online. However, I feel a lot of your 'reasoning' needs to be addressed, and since no one else has tackled it yet I will.
1) Your 'traitorous brother' anology -
I find this to be bordering on comical. The crux of your argument is that Paarthunax doesn't deserve to live because he turned against Alduin's tyranny - thereby betraying him. You say that Paarthunax is worse than his genocidal brother because he didn't go along with him.
Do you know what
complicity is? If you don't then I direct you to a book called Chronicle of a Death Foretold by Gabriel Garcia Marquez - you may learn something. If you know that a crime is going to occur and you have it in your power to report / stop it, but you choose not to, you are counted as guilty as the felon himself. You say that you would never turn on your brother, regardless of what he does. Does that mean if you walk in on your brother murdering someone or disposing of the body, and he asks you to never mention it again, you wouldn't? What if he tells you he plans on murdering another innocent - will you still stay mum?
It is not cowardly to stand up to any form of evil, even if it is being committed by someone you are close to. Rather, standing up against someone you love is possibly one of the greatest forms of bravery possible. You do not become a traitor because you see the error of someone's ways and attempt to help them, or failing that, stop them, for the
greater good.
Your lovely little argument:
also...notice how Paarthurnax's face is all busted up and such with his horns...that was most likely done by Alduin...to a borther who betrayed him...and even after all that...Alduin didn't have the heart to kill his own brother....even though Paarthurnaax wouldn't hesitate if the options were reversed because Paarthurnaax is a coward and a traitor....Alduin could have went right after Paarthurnaax from the get go...and he chose not to...in fact he was willing to give Paarthuranax another chance...after he was done...afterall...he is his brother....
that tries to portray Alduin in a merciful light for only slightly bashing his brother's face in = when, according to you, he should have finished the job because Paarthunax didn't agree with his tyrannical ambitions - is farcical.
2) Your 'defense by wiping them out' argumentI was almost waiting (with gritted teeth) for the US servicemen / Blades anology to come up and all too predictably it did.
The Blades hunted down and put dragons in the ground to protect the people of the Empire....thats why they were doing it....just like my brothers and sisters in uniform are protecting the my beloved USA from threats of people that would try to hurt us...the Blades are and were doing the same thing...protecting the people of the Empire from creatures that want to enslave and kill them....
Killing innocents simply because they are affiliated with an enemy is universally accepted as wrong. Women and children aren't killed, even if they shared the same opposing ideological view to you that their husband/father went to war against you for. The very thought is ridiculous, especially under the guise of 'preemptive defense'. Please tell me this was said in a tongue in cheek way or with satirical patriotism.
Paarthunax is the reason that humans exist today in Skyrim, and he has not given the Blades
any reason to attack him now. Not for 5000 years. And even back then in the immediate aftermath, one could argue his redemption absolved him of past crimes. Your argument would have every last man woman and child put to the block simply because they once thought of opposing your views, or may one day go on to disagree with you. Don't think you'd get away with that in any country, mate, no matter how trigger happy they infamously are.
Any other points you want to raise?