That's why I just can't understand things from a 100% skeptic point of view. For someone to say uh-uh, no way, it is impossible, these witnesses are either lying or mistaken. Simply because the skeptic has never experienced it personally, so it must be ridiculous. Well, I've never seen a narwhal in real life myself.
So teams go out, take pictures of the area (as if that means something) re-interview witnesses, and try not to snicker (as if the interviews will change anything), and then hang out in the area that something happened - as if the ghost, UFO or bigfoot is going to show itself again while the skeptic is tapping his foot.
I'm sure I could live in the arctic for a year and not see a narwhal.
We were not really skeptics, but we did not want to go at it from someone who believes that every bump and creek is a ghost. We were actually open minded about the whole thing. I have to admit every time we did hear a little bump were did the classic "what the hell was that!". If you are 1005 skeptical then what is the point of doing anything like that. I cant stand groups you see on TV who want to do nothing but prove its all in the mind.