What's so exciting about crossbows?

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:11 am

From an un biased source, ME..... i see the potential for roleplaying as a "ranger" may want a crossbow and also as an orc it is a more brutal weapon. But alos to the players who simply play it acts as another cool looking bow. like the people who wanted muskets..... :cryvaultboy:
User avatar
Marlo Stanfield
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 11:00 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:04 pm

Thats true, if they sent those guards up to Skyrim the war would be over in about 18 minutes.
Stop right there criminal scum! or I will chase you from one side of the map to the other!

I still experience the hair on the back of my neck rising up everytime I hear those words.
User avatar
Isaiah Burdeau
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:58 am

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:33 pm

You won't hear me arguing about the longbowman being a bit slow, there are far faster archers like in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yorHswhzrU (actual shooting doesn't start until around 2). But what I had in mind when linking the video was mainly to show that some crossbows are not as slow as some people seem to think.

That guy is a world class archer. He is shooting one arrow every 1.5 seconds, which is pretty amazing. Most people will never be able to do that no matter how much they train. EDIT: I watched the video to the end and it was interesting to hear that he uses his right brain when mounted, which is an instinctive style of shooting. That guy is a true artist the way he hits those targets at a rate of 6 in 10 seconds while travelling 20 MPH on horseback.

The thing about the crossbow reload speed from the previous video was it was a low draw weight crossbow, that is going to lack the armor piercing punch of a higher draw weight crossbow, and a higher draw weight crossbow is going to require some mechanical loading device (lever or winch) in order to reload. Thus the posts about the very slow reload speed of a crossbow.
User avatar
Sammygirl
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:15 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:54 pm

To make the Crossbow different from the bow they need to do the following: Have the Crossbow deal more damage than Bows. Also, when shot at armored enemies, have the Crossbow ignore the armor rating completely.
(And/OR do the obvious 2 things as well:)
1: Instant first shot (no need to nock an arrow and pull back an already readied crossbow)
2: long long reload.

If they do instant first shot- the advantage cannot be overstated.

Yep, you add these four things together and the crossbow would be quite a different weapon from a bow in the world of Skyrim. That would add some interesting variety. Far more variety than you get with the different types of one handed weapons, which amounts to little more than aesthetics.
User avatar
k a t e
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:00 am

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:57 pm

it's not the bow, it's people trying to feel... more advlt like because it's from Morrowind, they think that because they say they love a game from 2002 or what ever, that they appear more educated and smarter, and of course more nostalgic, they think they gain respect, it's not the bow, it's the game.

People want it because it was removed. They are feeling nostalgic.

Literally that is all.
Utter nonsense.

Or maybe people just like using them? Again another comment of "if you do not agree with me you are stupid". It has nothing about being more educated and smarter, it's about people who like using it. For me, I like using them in Morrowind because it was like having a gun, instead of a bow all the time. It's about more choices for people who like to Role Play.

Also about the "one shot" kills, come on, it's a game mechanic, funny how Bormir was never One Shot Killed.

Another reason people want cross bows, is what is next in TES VI? Just swords and no axes or maces? Like why bother with axes and maces when most people use swords. Its about varitey.
This one gets it.

Why do people want crossbows? Why do people want more spells? Why do people want choices?
Sure, there's a nostalgic part to some of the complaints. But to brush off all complaints about lack of variation as simple nostalgia is just stupid.

A crossbow is different from a bow both from a gameplay and a roleplaying perspective. For gameplay, the crossbow can deal less damage and reload slower than a bow, but offer the ability to move at full speed while the arrow is nocked.
For roleplaying, think of it like this: You can't decide that your character will only wield axes if axes has been removed from the game. That is what has happened to crossbows - since they aren't in the game anymore, there's one less choice when you customize your character.

It all boils down to variation. More choices means more variation and more indepth customization. And more customization is, by itself, always more fun.
User avatar
Life long Observer
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:07 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:12 am

That guy is a world class archer. He is shooting one arrow every 1.5 seconds, which is pretty amazing. Most people will never be able to do that no matter how much they train.

The thing about the crossbow reload speed from the previous video was it was a low draw weight crossbow, that is going to lack the armor piercing punch of a higher draw weight crossbow, and a higher draw weight crossbow is going to require some mechanical loading device (lever or winch) in order to reload. Thus the posts about the very slow reload speed of a crossbow.

Also that was a composite recurve bow, not a longbow- much less manly-man strength required, they are very very different weapons.

Yep, you add these four things together and the crossbow would be quite a different weapon from a bow in the world of Skyrim. That would add some interesting variety. Far more variety than you get with the different types of one handed weapons, which amounts to little more than aesthetics.

I have my fingers crossed that these things are indeed the change. It would be such a letdown if it was just aesthetics.
User avatar
Setal Vara
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:34 pm

Also that was a composite recurve bow, not a longbow- much less manly-man strength required, they are very very different weapons.

True, although you have to be reletively strong to pull a modern recurve with a decent draw weight. I imagine the composite bows would be similar. Don't need to be a hulking brute to pull one, but a ninety pound weakling is going to have a pretty hard time of it.


I have my fingers crossed that these things are indeed the change. It would be such a letdown if it was just aesthetics.

You and me both brother.
User avatar
Sammygirl500
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:46 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:48 pm


It all boils down to variation. More choices means more variation and more indepth customization. And more customization is, by itself, always more fun.

I have nothing against crossbows being the game, I would just never use them. As I stated in an earlier post, if I saw someone with a crossbow coming after me, I would just smile. I would also leave that enemy until last as they are the least threat to me out of a group enemies.
User avatar
Soraya Davy
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:53 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:27 am

THANK YOU for pointing this out. I'm so sick of the fantasy cliche of girls with little spindly arms using bows. Or skinny little rogues using bows.

In reality, with longbows it was the big, tough guys who used the things. Drawing a bow takes strength. Even more so to hold it while you aim.
In fairness though the use of a crossbow also implies a fair amount of upper body strength. It's applied in a different way to be sure but you still need it.
Equally, I think you're generalising somewhat. Yes it is a cliche in some way but equally:
A. In fantasy terms it's a trope so standard PERCEIVED gender-based differences do not apply
B. Women are PERFECTLY capable of using a bow, a LONGBOW is only one type of bow, they are not all like that, and regardless of your gender if you had spent a lifetime using one you would have the strength, to use one.
User avatar
quinnnn
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:11 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:07 pm

In fairness though the use of a crossbow also implies a fair amount of upper body strength. It's applied in a different way to be sure but you still need it.
Equally, I think you're generalising somewhat. Yes it is a cliche in some way but equally:
A. In fantasy terms it's a trope so standard PERCEIVED gender-based differences do not apply
B. Women are PERFECTLY capable of using a bow, a LONGBOW is only one type of bow, they are not all like that, and regardless of your gender if you had spent a lifetime using one you would have the strength, to use one.

... lets please not go there.
User avatar
Naomi Ward
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:37 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:02 am

I have nothing against crossbows being the game, I would just never use them. As I stated in an earlier post, if I saw someone with a crossbow coming after me, I would just smile. I would also leave that enemy until last as they are the least threat to me out of a group enemies.

But if crossbows were done right (with proper NPC AI), you would have an enemy coming up to you and firing one quick, high damage hard to dodge shot before drawing down on you with a 2H weapon. I don't think anyone is advocating that people would take continuous crossbow shots in Skyrim (outside of sneak situations). I agree if they were implemented as slower versions of bows they would not add that much. But if they were implemented to do a lot more damage, reload much slower but with a quick initial shot and allow unrestricted movement when aiming (i.e., you could run up to someone while aiming your shot) then they could add real variety to the game.
User avatar
Monique Cameron
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:30 am

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:46 am

@ Udey. :biggrin: Agreed. Some cans of worms are better left unopened.
User avatar
Alada Vaginah
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:31 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:12 am

@ Udey. :biggrin: Agreed. Some cans of worms are better left unopened.
I fail to see why - it seemed a perfectly reasonable point to make. I'm sure there are plenty of female members of archery teams the world over who would take issue with the view that they are unable to draw a bow, which seems to me to be the implication...
...But hey, there. you. go.
User avatar
.X chantelle .x Smith
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:25 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:43 pm

I have nothing against crossbows being the game, I would just never use them.
That's kind of how I feel about shields. I have only played one character who used shields, and that was only part-time, I mostly used a 2H sword. Still, the choice to use crossbows and shields makes the game better, doesn't it? :smile:
As I stated in an earlier post, if I saw someone with a crossbow coming after me, I would just smile. I would also leave that enemy until last as they are the least threat to me out of a group enemies.
For the sake of balance, the crossbows would have to deal a lot more damage than bows or sport a lot faster (and less realistic) reload time. When a crossbow-wielding enemy sees you and immediately fires a one-hitting bolt without having to nock an arrow or draw a string back you're not smiling anymore!

If the game wasn't balanced, we would be left smiling at every dual-wielding enemy who almost falls over of fatigue with each swing of his 2 steel swords. :biggrin:
User avatar
Franko AlVarado
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:41 pm

For the sake of balance, the crossbows would have to deal a lot more damage than bows or sport a lot faster (and less realistic) reload time. When a crossbow-wielding enemy sees you and immediately fires a one-hitting bolt without having to nock an arrow or draw a string back you're not smiling anymore!
Indeed, though to be as you say realistic, the draw time would have to offset the damage. So you would be able to one shot kill but it would take you a LOT longer to ready the shot - which is reasonable I think.
User avatar
Teghan Harris
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:31 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:51 am

Indeed, though to be as you say realistic, the draw time would have to offset the damage. So you would be able to one shot kill but it would take you a LOT longer to ready the shot - which is reasonable I think.
Indeed, and the "high risk, high reward" kind of crossbow (high damage, slow reload) would be a lot more fun than an average damage-dealing crossbow with a faster reload time, as the latter would not be any different from a normal bow.
User avatar
Tiffany Holmes
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:28 am

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:04 am

crossbows are just more fun and advanced. higher fire rate and awsome acuracy. plus it doesnt take up most of ur screen
User avatar
mike
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:51 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:53 am

And there is a lot to do before being able to fire the crossbow again:

1. Spin trigger nut back to firing position and let the trigger lever engage it
2. Put in safety pin (to prevent dry firing while reloading - it would destroy your crossbow)
3. Draw the string using both hands while stabilizing it with your foot in the stirrup
4. Put in a fresh bolt
5. Pull out the safety pin
Ready!

If you're familiar with a crossbow this procedure will take you at least 8 Seconds
User avatar
mishionary
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:19 am

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:54 am

I pretty much think they should be higher impact with lots of knock-back (possibly pinning enemies to surfaces) with a reload duration that's equal to the amount of damage. I just really hope they come in all sorts of materials, Daedric Crossbows please.
User avatar
BrEezy Baby
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:57 am

You people are saying why... I say why not? That is my philosophy.
User avatar
QuinDINGDONGcey
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:11 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:00 am

@Phon I am not implying anything of the sort. Debating gender differences is just a bad idea.

Minimum draw weight to hunt deer in my state is 40 pounds at 28 inches. For Skyrim combat purposes, you would want considerably more than that. Longbows with a 100 pound draw are not uncommon when hunting bigger game like bear. The higher the draw weight the more strength it takes to pull the bow. Gender has nothing to do with it.
User avatar
Amiee Kent
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:25 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:17 am

@OP: Because it's a primitive firearm with no bang. I would like to see an actual crossbow in-game, but I will stick with crouching and turning my bow sideways, for now. Personally I would much rather see throwing knives before crossbows. Why can't my sneaky assassin flick a blade from the shadows?????
User avatar
Amber Hubbard
 
Posts: 3537
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:59 pm

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:35 am

Personally, I believe a crossbow should be instant fired, as opposed to the draw and fire of bows. Obviously, there will be longer reload time after firing. A crossbow will also have a shorter range.

This gives crossbow a tactical difference, it works better against lone targets at shorter range while bow masters can snipe groups from farther and remain undetected.
User avatar
Alisha Clarke
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:53 am

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:11 am

This is not a dig at skyrim. I love it. But more weapon variety is what is exciting. Same goes for spears if they ever see the light of day. An expansive arsenal of weapons makes for deeper and more fun gameplay. This is one of the things morrowind did very well.
User avatar
Nancy RIP
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:42 am

Post » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:58 pm

Post limit.
User avatar
Monique Cameron
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:30 am

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim