It's been confirmed that it will have a definitive ending but do you want it to be "fixed" with a dlc?

Oh god please not another one of these
these all end with the exact same debates :banghead:

I'm sorry if I seem like a troll for this post but there have been so many of these and they're all just 8 pages of people arguing

I'm happy with the idea of New Vegas having a solid ending, as long as the ending feels properly epic. I am perfectly fine with doing all of my goofing off before the final mission, I don't need to let my character squander in forever land.

its already been confirmed that FNV has a definite ending.

Read my original post

I don't really care either way whatever Obsidian thinks is best.

It has a definitive ending confirmed

You didn't have a "Oh GOD YES!!!" option.
And yaaay for another ending thread.
Now we wait for someone who don't want it and then explain it to them why it's better with definite ending than post-final quest gameplay.
And no, god [censored] no to any Broken Steel DLC, it [censored] up fallout 3 so never ever ever again. :goodjob:

Well,http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1100321-fnv-a-true-rpg/ is about the same topic as this and contains all the explanations why.

And no, I don't want to continue playing after the main quest.
Poor horse, always being beaten to death until the ends of time.

i think that fallout 3 shouldve always had an ending after i bought broken steel because i didnt like the way they brought you back into the game

in new vegas however because your a courier and its a bigger game i think yes it should just to have time to find secrets and such

i understand all points on why it should and shouldnt and this is only MY OPINION (a personal view, attitude, or appraisal.)

I like polls because after you vote once there is no reason to stick around, also it shows exactly how many people said they wanted an ending so if they complain we can give them a link to this poll

Most definitely not. If the devs have gone to great lenghts to make an ending that just doesn't warrant post-end playing, that's the way it should remain. If they wanted to make the ending open, they would've done it in the first place, so there's no reason to "fix" it.

No, no, and no.

As long as the ending slideshow is good, I will be extremely satisfied. Besides, no way a DLC can show all the outcomes of our actions.

It should be where the Enc- ...What? Yeah, It probably will have an ending

A DLC will hopefully be about the aftermath of whatever happened in the main storyline.
Probably adding in a load of new factions.

as long as the average gamer that doesn't read about the game on the internet gets a warning before the brick wall then everything will be fine

Personally I want a GOOD solid end to the main quest line, but am not too bothered as to whether or not it continues on afterwards with the proviso that it doesn't render my choices up until the end of the main quest line inconsequentual.
With regards to the definate ending being fixed, if they do decide to do that, I hope that they do not roll over and present us with a similar fetid pile of game breaking manure that was Borked Steel, which completely obliterated Fallout 3's designed game balance and forced all of your characters to end up with the same skillsets if you did not severely/obscenely gimp yourself in at least one specific stat and a lot of perk choices and even then it was hard not to become a J.O.N.T.M.O.A. (Jack of No Trades, Master of All) wasteland deity of destruction and general overpoweredness.

Its good to have a definite ending especially if it has a great ending that really gives me a sense of what I've done to the Mojave Wasteland and New Vegas as a whole, it needs to make me feel like I've accomplished something by the end of my adventure. As they say all good things must come to an end at some point. :tops:

No, I don't want it to be broken by a DLC.

I don't care one way or the other. I'm going to beat the ending, then reload a previous save, and pretend I've beaten it and the world is all and well etc etc etc

It's ending get over it. There should not be a DLC to "Fix" it. If you hate the idea of it ending, play another game that does not. Or better yet go play othe Originals and see how awesome it is to have an ending that tells you what happens to the people and places years after the end. With multiple endings based on how you played. FO3's ending svcked because it did not tell us anything. All it did was pass judgment on us.

Great thing about the originals and the endings are it adds alot of replayability. You can try new things to get new outcomes. Play new ways, take new options during a quest and see how that effects the end. With no ending and FO3's crap end it feels like my actions mean nothing. All that work and nothing! I don't learn what happens to people or places, the wasteland as a whole. I want my actions to mean something in a game.

Speaking of 'Fixing' F:NV. How can you fix what isnt broken?

Oh, great. This topic again.

/target dead horse
/beat



God no. Broken Steel (appropriately) broke more parts of the game than it improved. I don't bother installling it anymore, when I want to play FO3. It's not worth it.

If the never ending flow of these threads on the issue are any indication, experiencing things without endings is a fate worse than death.

Broken [censored] (Broken steel) screwed up my GOTY for my windows 7