Whoa, take it down a notch pal. I didn't call you names.
Oh, I'm being serious. Say you're like a normal person. Harshly affected by the economy, using a console to play Skyrim. Now imagine every loading screen taking anywhere between 30 seconds - 2 minutes to load. That is the reality I live in.
Well first of all, I want to say I'm sorry that you live in such a harsh reality. The fact of the matter is that if you don't like doing guilds, you don't need to do them. No one says you
have to do them and having more content wouldn't intrinsically decrease your hardware's performance, it just increases the amount of content open for you to experience, hopefully for a time where Bethesda will improve the way Skyrim runs on your console. If you hate doing guild quests so much, why are you complaining about when someone wants more quests added? It seems you should avoid them completely if they give you such trouble.
Now... say you want me to re-evaluate the 60$ I spent on this game? You realise I bought this game for the adventure, not the FIVE TRILLION GUILD QUESTLINES THAT TAKE FOREVER. Using the 60$ I spent on this poor economy as an excuse to hypocrisize me is funny too. Unlike many people on this forum, I have a JOB. I do work when I can, and when there is spare money, I typically spend it. In this case, I ran into 60 extra bucks, and bought skyrim. So... let me re-iterate... Just because I live in a poor economy, doesn't mean I can't afford something worth 60$. If that were true, I couldn't afford food you moron.
I'm happy you have a job, and I'm happy you can afford to eat. You are, however, the one who brought up the bad economy... That tells me that you're conscientious about how you want to spend your money. If that's not true, why bring the economy up? All I'm saying is that Skyrim is supposed to be an RPG, and clearly an RPG is not the kind of game you're looking for because apparently the quest lines and everything else are too demanding on your console. By the way, I'd like to quote you in my sig because this just goes to prove the point of other people, including myself, who have said in other places that Skyrim is more action-adventure than RPG.
To top it all off, you're dumb. You're posting this whole statement in the wrong forum. You are recommending Morrowind in a Skyrim forum, to someone who has played Morrowind 2 years ago, and LOATHED it. Why don't you just find someone else to troll? I'm sure they wouldn't mind...
Oh nevermind, I'm dumb. I forgot. Might as well just erase what I've been typing so far. You're so far out of line you wouldn't be able to see the line if it was on top of White-Gold Tower and you were looking at it from Bruma. I don't think I recommended Morrowind to anyone here, and if I did and you 'LOATHED' Morrowind then fine, don't take my advice. But it is completely legitimate to bring up distinctions between Skyrim and its predecessor games and point out where Skyrim and its future installments could be improved, and what past games did better which (I think) needs to be brought back.
All in all I'm a little surprised at the tone of your post. Everything I've said in this thread has been said with respect, and attempted understanding. Never did I insult or attack you personally, and if you feel that way then it wasn't intended. I only say that last part because the only way I can rationalize this vitriol is somehow I struck a nerve somewhere, but again I assure you it was unintentional.