Personally, I really avoid Steamworks because of my recent experience with it on another game. I don't have FNV simply because of Steam.
yes, I have firewalled Steam for the time being & do shutdown the comp when I go to bed.
what I wouldn't give for a legit offline installation option, just remember Steamworks is still managing your rights just like any other DRM it just has a carrot for you to enjoy, & not everyone can use the carrot.
True up to a point, Steam may only stop the piracy initially but it quickly doesn't matter, just like any other DRM that the legit user may not need to jump through hoops & huge downloads to get to use what they paid for even if they got a disc version
Steam was very unstable on my computer before I locked it down.
maybe, but only because of the store but it is still a form of DRM & honesty has nothing to do with it, it causes problems for some.
it took me about 5 hours just to install/update Steam when I got it.
While it's good that you can enjoy Steam on such a connection, not everyone has that luxury.
I don't care if Steam managing my rights because Steam doesn't blow and act all draconian like DRM does. Steam doesn't tell me I can't install a game to however many computers I want to, it doesn't give me grief when I want to uninstall something, all of the things that are wrong with DRM are pretty much absent from Steam. As for piracy, it may not matter but it still is infinitely better than dealing with DRM which is pretty much the only other option companies will go with since they don't understand that you'll never stop piracy.
If Steam is unstable for you, the problem isn't with Steam, it's with your computer. What kind of instability do you have with "Steam?"
As for the problems some people have, they are in a minority so small that it's not funny, this thread is the first time I have ever seen people complain about Steam like this outside of when it first came out and wasn't nearly as good as it is now. This thread pales in comparison to the mobs of people with pitchforks that arise when some terrible DRM like that of Spore's or Assassin's Creed II come along.
Some day in the not too distant future, Valve will either go under, be sold, or sell the Steam service, and it will cease to exist. It's happened to other high-profile providers of digital content, e.g. the DVD-based DIVX, and it will inevitably happen to Steam. For content exclusive to Steam, it will be the gaming equivalent of the burning of the Library of Alexandria. That's not a problem exclusive to Steam, obviously, but it warrants consideration by artists and consumers alike.
Edit: Historical anecdote. Liquid Audio was a popular DRM-restricted audio format around the turn of the century. As a company, they played a significant role in the implementation of certain provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Microsoft purchased Liquid's DRM assets, and the company went under shortly thereafter. As far as I know, Liquid Audio content can no longer be decrypted. At the time, very little music was distributed solely through online channels, and only "exclusive" content was lost; however, Liquid Audio's demise still serves as a cautionary tale for the current generation of media consumers.
Yeah, I don't see that happening any time remotely soon. That's like saying Blizzard will go under, the odds of it happening are so extremely unlikely due to them being one of the top developers in the world, and Valve is one of those too. That doesn't even begin to address the fact that Steam absolutely dominates retail stores and other digital distribution methods and is making money like crazy. Steam isn't going to go away because a couple people throw a hissy fit because it auto updates their games with patches that aren't the best in the world and aren't their fault.
Well luckily I live in Canada. Where if Steam folds, people can crack the piss out of any title which has copy protection as the product is theirs. There's similar laws all over countries in the EU as well. But at the end of the day steam only adds one thing. The ability for publishes to ensure that they can keep digital releases at big-box store prices indefinitely. Sometimes more. I've said it before, I'll say it again.
Where I live, if I bought steam though digital download it would have looked like this:
$39.99+7(for bandwidth) because we're capped, plus taxes on both items
What I paid:
$37.99 at Futureshop, while I was in a local city buying other junk.
And Steam has sales all the time and goes through price drops, more so than they ever do at retail places. When's the last time you saw anywhere from 25% - 75% off sales on stuff at a retail store? As for the bandwidth, that's not Steam's fault or problem, thats because you have ghetto internet. Same for the taxes, most places in the states don't pay taxes on stuff purchased through Steam.
Steam doesn't stop piracy. If fact it only encourages it since over the years, Steam has proven to be nothing more then an ennobled FTP server with bad protection and therefore is a failed concept. Games released through the Steam network are being detached from the network in no-time and 'released' over the internet. Something that Ritual Entertainment discovered the hard way with their 'top title' Sin Episodes: Emergence with the result that they are now defunct.
From time to time, other developers are also experiencing the FTP issue, since many people who have legitimately bought their game can receive on launch day (and/or the early days after release) a “Game is unavailable” message, if they don't recieve a “The server is too busy to handle your request” message, therefore unable to play their legitimately bought game. People who have 'acquired' the game through different means are then in possession of a version which they can play at all times, sometimes even before the games are officially released!
Compared to (for example) Direct2Drive, the amount of hits that I get when I activly search for a so-called "steam crack" or no-steam version, will far outnumber the amount of hits I will get if I search for a D2D crack/version and the first crack that remotely enables me access their network and functionalities, similar of that of those Steam cracks, I still have to find. That says a lot . . .
Calling Steam a failed concept is just plain laughable. And what do you expect as for the unavailable stuff? You don't think that there's going to be hiccups when there's tens of thousands or more people all trying to get a game at the same time?
Well since you asked, I have listed my reasons at great length in other posts and in other threads; but I would also like an answer to my question and you seem to be a prime example of the type of person best suited to answer it. So I would exchange my answer for yours’, and in the spirit of goodwill I will go first. The following are a list of features added to Steam over the years:
Steam Deals – These seem to range between “Wow! 75% off of a game I don’t want!” and “Wow! $5 is a great price for that game I already have!” So no real benefits for me.
The Steam Community – I have other means of talking to my friends, when I’m playing a game (especially a single player game) I want to be left alone. I also don’t care how many hours anyone spent playing any game, not even my own hours. Honestly the thought that someone I don’t know even wants to see my gaming habits is kinda creepy.
Achievements – Really!!?? Who came up with this? A completely arbitrary set of challenges to be completed in game but offer no in game benefits. I typically play a solo unarmed/melee character, so I would have to completely change my playstyle to get some of those achievements. If there was an actual reward (Like a free DLC for getting them all :hubbahubba: ) then I would take the time to try it out, but for something as inane as bragging rights… :shakehead:
Play on any PC/Cloud/Play on Mac – I custom built my rig for playing the games I wanted to play, why would I go to some other computer to play them? It would be pointless to try to play on my wife’s netbook, and installing games at work is frowned upon. If I’m only playing on the one machine I’m not too worried about my game saves. I sometimes like to make separate save folders for different character, I don’t need my saves backed up anywhere. I don’t want to go into long winded discussion that is irrelevant to this thread so I will just say this: You will see Bill Gates using a Mac before you ever see me using one.
Never need a Disk again – But I like my disks, they’re so shinny! :shocking:
I take good care of my stuff, I don’t have a history of damaging or losing my disks but I do understand the benefits that this offers to other people. This is why those of us who prefer disks should be able to use them by themselves, without the need for Steam. Many of the games I play have the protection measure of requiring the disk to play, some of them (like Fallout 3 or Starcraft) have easy workarounds, but even for those that don’t it has never been an issue for me to just put the disk in the tray and leave it there until I want to play something else.
Now I do realize that I can disable or ignore these features, but what is the point of having Steam when I have to disable every option that it has? For that matter why does Steam need to be installed on my machine at all? The Fallout Nexus offers Digital Distribution and Community Features and keeps Profile History and could handle even more Goodies without the need to download and install a special program, what is so special about Steam that my games absolutely cannot function unless it is installed, updated and running? I truly believe that Digital Distribution will be the main venue for software sales in the near future, however the Steam model is too draconian to be a part of that future.
Now my question: Those who love Steam, and it's clear you fall into this catagory, have what they want. Why the need to belittle those of us who have different preferences and/or priorities?
I don't believe that the Anti-Steam crowd is here to start a fight, we just want our opinions heard, and perhaps acknowledged, by the only entity capable of leagally decoupling Fallout: New Vegas from Steam. (this is their board isn't it)
Steam Deals - I find it hard to believe that there has never been anything on sale, especially during their holiday sales, that you have never wanted. The volume of stuff that they sell during those sales means there's plenty of people out there willing to buy stuff from them.
Steam Community - Then don't use it? There's nothing stopping you from not using it or adding friends to it and such. And if you have other means and the friends on there use Steam as well, why not just kill two birds with one stone unless you are talking about stuff like voice chat?
Achievements - Really? REALLY? You are going to hold something like that against Steam and games on Steam just because you don't like the concept, despite the fact that it doesn't harm, hinder, etc you in any way shape or form? If you don't care about them then don't bother doing them.
Play on any PC/Cloud/Play on Mac – Then its not for you then. The idea is to allow people who DO use other computers to access their stuff whenever and wherever they are.
Never need a Disk again – Like some of the other stuff, I think you'd find yourself in a minority in the case. Even though I take relatively good care of my discs, other than leaving them out for long periods of time, I'm glad to ditch them in favour of just DLing my stuff. The only reason I even buy physical stuff anymore is for Collector's Editions when it comes to PC stuff. Steam saves me the trouble of going to the store and having to keep the disc(s) and boxes in my house. Do you still buy CDs instead buying / "acquiring" mp3s/some other format?
I really cannot understand calling Steam draconian when its still the best digital distributor out there by a country mile and beats ever form of DRM there is.
I agree with you 200%. Beth using steam to play this game is the one main reason i havent purchesed NV and i have and use steam for one multiplayer game shooter, I will not use it for single player games period. What ever back door sleazy deal they made with Valve steam, valve came out the clear winner in that agreement. I know a lot of people think steam is great and thats fine but a gaming company like beth should not force it on you. If i want to DL a game like nv and spend half the night DL it with dsl fine my choice. If i spend 30 mins drinving to a game store come home that drive to get the game should be my biggest hassle. There is 0 reason to put steam on a hard copy single player game.
SteveDog summed up my thoughts in a really good post above.
This part (Now I do realize that I can disable or ignore these features, but what is the point of having Steam when I have to disable every option that it has? For that matter why does Steam need to be installed on my machine at all? )
No, Bethesda comes out the winner since they make more money from digital distribution than they do from retail sales http://www.mcvuk.com/features/808/OPINION-Retail-vs-Steam . Anyone hating on Steam should give that a read to understand why Bethesda would team up with Valve.