I know Steam is inconvenient compared to not having any DRM, but it is more convenient than a lot of other DRM.
Being a frequent traveler of the net, I can say that it is no better then the basic disc check from before.
Anything more then that is a hindrance, not a deterrent.
i love these anti steam threads, are you people aware most of the PC gaming community love steam ? As a digital store and a place where i can launch all my games with a few mouse clicks its awesome, and you sometimes get great deals on games.. wait till the annual steam christmas sale when a lot of games will be going for cheap if your a gamer it will be like christmas literally or something like that

As for the auto patching are you people aware that generally auto patching is a good thing ? Generally it saves us gamers from having to hunt around game sites or support forums to find the latest patch. Its not steams fault that Bethesda and obsidian cant program for peanuts and screw up everything they touch and don't test what they make. If your going to blame anyone blame the source, blame Bethesda they are the ones who are screwing things up and making your games unplayable, not steam or valve...
Ohh and steam has an offline mode that works fairly well..

I agree, Steam is good. It is nice to have when feeling lazy and not wanting to go to the store, or for indie games, etc. However, the fact that it is MANDATORY is what I take issue with. I bought Assassins Creed 2 though steam as opposed to disc. Same for Mass Effect 2. I did that because I didn't care if steam was running. But with Fallout, I do care for a number of reasons. Main being the track record of patches with Fallout being less then satisfactory right off the bat. In order to make 100% for sure that Fallout does not update, I have completely cut steam off from the internet. Stripping its ability to even see the light of day, or take a piss without my knowing. Not to mention, I bought the physical copy because that is what I wanted. The game, and the game only. That is why I prefer hard copies over digital copies. I want to make 100% sure that I can play my games in the event that no internet access is available.
Not to mention the complete stupidity of requiring a 3rd party application just to run a game. I rarely use the in-game features. I don't use if as my social networking hub. I just simply do not use 90% of its features. I only use it for getting small indie games or games I am to lazy to get myself. Period, the end, that is all.
But alas, the idea of "don't support what you don't like is invalid in this situation. How do I tell Valve that I don't want them in my games when I am not given the choice? Steam is not an essential component of the game itself. The game itself does not burst in flames if steam is not there. Therefore it can not be considered mandatory.
Bleh... now to play some minecraft...