Do the Blades' motives make any sense?

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:53 am

Parthy serves no gaming perpose to keep alive. On top of that he's a traitor to his own kind and would likely turn like a snake if given the chance. Read up on the lore, or just study history. The blades mission is to protect civilization, your either down with it or not. The grey beards are a bunch of out of touch with reality cultists.
User avatar
CYCO JO-NATE
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:41 pm

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:00 am

He did some good, but I don't think he's spent that time doing nothing but good. He's spent most of that doing simply nothing. The Greybeards aren't about being good.. if they were, they'd be active. They're more like Taoists or Stoics.. just balanced.. just "being".
User avatar
April
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:33 am

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:05 am

I believe that no one is inherently good or evil. It is our thoughts and actions that are good or evil, actions being the more important of the two.

3,000 years ago, Paarthurnax committed many evil acts. Then he stopped, and has spent the past 3,000 years doing nothing but good, including doing everything in his power to right his past wrongs. There's no reason to believe that he poses any danger to innocent mortals, thus, to murder him would be an act of evil.

JM not-so-humble O

100% agreed. Also, when he did the 'evil' acts, it wasnt like he had a choice, was it?

if he, or indeed any dragon said "no, i'm not doing that" then Alduin and his buddies would either kill them on the spot, or ambush them later on.

I also dont see why Akatosh, who is a dragon, would create dragons and then turn around and say 'ok, you exist only to be killed...Sorry", as that doesn't make sense.

I for one have a easy answer for this debate: why not allow an option (or have it refered to in a future game) for both the Blades and Paarthunax andhis Greybeards to make amends, "Agree to disagree" and basically let go of the past, TRUST each other, and work together to help the world against and even more current and deadly threat...the Thalmor!

Seriously, Paarthunax did wrong, yes...but hasn't everyone?
User avatar
Jordan Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:27 am

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:07 pm

lol.. I think you missed the point of how different they are. They'd never agree. It's the difference between war and peace. One side defines itself by war. One by peace. There's nothing to agree on.
User avatar
naana
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:00 pm

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:18 am

100% agreed. Also, when he did the 'evil' acts, it wasnt like he had a choice, was it?

if he, or indeed any dragon said "no, i'm not doing that" then Alduin and his buddies would either kill them on the spot, or ambush them later on.

I also dont see why Akatosh, who is a dragon, would create dragons and then turn around and say 'ok, you exist only to be killed...Sorry", as that doesn't make sense.

I for one have a easy answer for this debate: why not allow an option (or have it refered to in a future game) for both the Blades and Paarthunax andhis Greybeards to make amends, "Agree to disagree" and basically let go of the past, TRUST each other, and work together to help the world against and even more current and deadly threat...the Thalmor!

Seriously, Paarthunax did wrong, yes...but hasn't everyone?

Shucks your right, saddam should never have been hung but given the option to become a humanitarian instead.
User avatar
Benjamin Holz
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:34 pm

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 4:27 am

Shucks your right, saddam should never have been hung but given the option to become a humanitarian instead.

So what you're saying is kill either the Blades or Greybeards? You also do realise that by hanging Saddam (especially since he was hanged in a violent manner), we caused a civil war in the middle east; people loyal to him went on a psycotic rampage killing others in revenge (even though he was a threat, plus he made no attempts to redeem himself or seek forgiveness)

The same happened with Bin lard-butt, and gadaffi (or whatever his name is)...This is what is so hard about conflicts...we dont know what side is the right side or what their reasons were for what they did...I dont agree with either sides methods of killing others, but we can't have a non-violent world, because nature and life is cruel.

I know it's a game, but what I'm saying is, just like in real life, wanting revenge on someone or a group of people who did wrong long ago will only lead to conflict again, it won't solve anything whatsoever.

I do give credit tp Bethesda for having these two groups that have their own reasons for what to do or not...it makes us the player have to make a moral choice, but I would still like to have an option to get rid of the Blades anyhow.
User avatar
Chrissie Pillinger
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 3:26 am

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:56 pm

Shucks your right, saddam should never have been hung but given the option to become a humanitarian instead.

Hey let's throw in whether or not the death penalty is morally right while we're on irrelevant topics. :rolleyes:


How about if Saddam was a whole other species (a species that thrives and exists on dominating lesser species), practically an alien, and he killed a bunch of humans thousands of years ago. Then, he taught those same humans the way of his voice so that they could overthrow and battle his own kin. Then, generations later, he seals the deal by teaching a mortal with the soul of his kin how to find out about Alienrend, the ultimate tool for killing his brother Alduin, and preventing the aliens (dragons) from ever dominating the world while he lives. Thus having saved humanity TWICE. And of course anyone can learn "Alienrend" as a shout with enough time in high rothgar, so even when the "Alienborn" is gone, a whole other generation of warriors can learn to keep the "Aliens" at bay.


Now let's forget all that...and just kill him. Just drive a sword right into the ancient beast because ol' Delphine has a chip on her shoulder. Her great, great, great, great, great, great, great grand parents probably didn't even experience those wars, but hey, she's got an oath right? Unless it applies to Odahviing of course.


*Cue anthem of the righteous*
User avatar
Rude_Bitch_420
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:26 pm

Post » Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:24 pm

but hey, she's got an oath right? Unless it applies to Odahviing of course.


*Cue anthem of the righteous*

Anybody here from Morrowind remember if there's any oath you take when you become a member of the Blades? And what the oath is? We never really became one in Oblivion, just honorary member, so I'd say it doesn't count
User avatar
Heather Dawson
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:14 pm

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:34 am

So what you're saying is kill either the Blades or Greybeards?

I know it's a game, but just like in real life, wanting revenge on someone or a group of people who did wrong long ago will only lead to conflict again, it won't solve anything.

I do give credit tp Bethesda for having these two groups that have their own reasons for what to do or not...it makes us the player have to make a moral choice, but I would still like to have an option to get rid of the Blades anyhow.
Hey let's throw in whether or not the death penalty is morally right while we're on irrelevant topics. :rolleyes:


How about if Saddam was a whole other species (a species that thrives and exists on dominating lesser species), practically an alien, and he killed a bunch of humans thousands of years ago. Then, he taught those same humans the way of his voice so that they could overthrow and battle his own kin. Then, generations later, he seals the deal by teaching a mortal with the soul of his kin how to find out about Alienrend, the ultimate tool for killing his brother Alduin, and preventing the aliens (dragons) from ever dominating the world while he lives. Thus having saved humanity TWICE. And of course anyone can learn "Alienrend" as a shout with enough time in high rothgar, so even when the "Alienborn" is gone, a whole other generation of warriors can learn to keep the "Aliens" at bay.


Now let's forget all that...and just kill him. Just drive a sword right into the ancient beast because ol' Delphine has a chip on her shoulder. Her great, great, great, great, great, great, great grand parents probably didn't even experience those wars, but hey, she's got an oath right? Unless it applies to Odahviing of course.


*Cue anthem of the righteous*

If if's and but's were candy and nuts we'd all have a merry christmas.
User avatar
lolli
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:42 am

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:53 am



....If people would just understand that NOT everyone has the same opinion than this back-and-forth bickering wouldn't happen.

I actually listened to the story..Paid attention to all the dialogue and came up with my OWN judgement when it came to Parthurnax and i just don;t rust a mass murderer.. And just because you don't like my opinion of it you assume i don't pay attention to anything?? lmao.

I have multiple characters... Depending what i play i choose a different mind set and view of the world around me. This is a RPG isn't it?

Really? So your stream of immature comments stating your negative opinion against paarth as fact are not as well?

Paarthurnax and some of the other dragons could've possibly been in a position to help the humans in the dragon war, except they were in no position to help because the blades were making a fuss and HUNTING THEM ALL DOWN.

It's quite obvious you have not listened to all the dialogue.
User avatar
Danial Zachery
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:41 am

Post » Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:18 am

Post limit.
User avatar
Darian Ennels
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:00 pm

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim