The Empire isn't responsible for signing a treaty that bans the worship of Talos?
Which part of "more liberal" did you not get? And they were forced to agree on a gunpoint, which couldn't be said for Nords.
You really want to include George Orwell in this? And you think that Orwell's criticism of Soviet Communism applies?
This is becoming pointless, you're no challenge or fun to reply to.
A short logical sequence:
Premise A: "Everyone should be allowed to worship whomever they want or no one at all." (real quote)
Premise B: "Forsworn are not allowed to worship their gods."
Conclusion: Orwellian "some religions are more equal than others".
And now you're asking me if Orwell's line applies. Of course it does. These things are called metaphors and anologies and whatever else. Abstraction cannot apply to a single real case, otherwise it would not be an abstraction.
You want to talk hypocrisy? People who tell others its horrible to be on the Stormcloaks, but support a serial-killer cult.
That's not a hypocrisy, it's called preference.
It would be a hypocrisy if I said "I am against serial killer cults" and then joined or supported one.
People who join Stormcloaks because they like killing Imperials, because they have better-looking equipment, because they are roleplaying a bodyguard of Ulfric, or whatever other RP reason: none of these people are hypocrits. They choose a story and go with it, and that's all fine. Hypocrites are those who rage about freedom of the religion while Nords are pioneering it. That's the point of this thread.