Using Todd's BoredomFrustration diagram, Destruction's flaw : V - Skyrim

» Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:55 am

"Magic, by its very nature, is volatine and dangerous" - Tolfdir

I don't see a lot of one/two-handed/bow users complaining they need smiting or enchanting.
Or that melee users need a lot of armor to survive, or that archers need stealth or something.

Sure, you can be a master of destruction, but it's your own fault for not using all the other abilities that would improve your strength in your chosen style of combat.

I am not able to increase the potency of destruction, unless I use alchemy, always loathed alchemy. Destruction becomes somewhat obsolete against high level oponents. I also do beleive in having a spell for every purpose, I enjoyed making spells designed to combat specific threats but I can not do this in skyrim.

» Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:09 am

Hmm... I also miss Command Humanoid/Creature.. Those were fun...

» Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:57 am

Only God can cast spells continuosly without draining mana. The game doesn't have mana potions for nothing. I think lightning is probably the most main stream destruction spell. I believe it's not so much the spell's damage but the npc's resistence to it. But there aren't many NPC's that are immune or resistant to lightning in the game.

» Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:27 am

Only God can cast spells continuosly without draining mana. The game doesn't have mana potions for nothing. I think lightning is probably the most main stream destruction spell. I believe it's not so much the spell's damage but the npc's resistence to it. But there aren't many NPC's that are immune or resistant to lightning in the game.

WRONG!

Only the daedra/aedra