Do you think you'll play exclusively in hardcoe mode, or try playing both ways after the first playthrough?

Don?t know about him but unless I can pick what part of the hardcoe mode that?s in effect I won?t touch it.

I missed that part about the modifed 9mm. :facepalm:

I am just excited about new ammo types! I am just strange like that.

My friend couldn't buy PC gamer cause he was too young so i bought one for him, don't you think pc gamer should be 12+?

+1

I'll take whatever I can get my mits on. hardcoe mode and Very Hard, here I come!

See i love realism, so i'd proobably hop straight onto hardcoe

I don't think I'll ever use anything but hardcoe mode. I'd rather add to it then take away.

I wonder if there will be some Gamestop promotional item or what not for this game, And I love all the info you've given me, I know know what to think of, if there is indeed a "Perk" contest.'

Absolute going to buy this and play it in hardcoe. Most likely wont touch normal mode at all.

Word.

To be honest I'm a little worried about some of the things in the game

These are the things I'm worried about

1. the geckos

2. the fact that new vegas isn't all that blown up

3. The insane similarity to fallout three

yeah boy

yeah ok, well anyway ESV isn't coming out anytime soon, and FO3 was a huge success more so than ES and besides there are plenty of midevil type games around and its pretty obvious they bought the rights to fallout to work on it, not wait 5 years for FO4 that ain't gonna happen, its coming out late next year and ESV may never come out with the Fallout series going strong. look FO was so huge that now we have FO new vegas and next year FO4. so sorry to burst the bubble for all the ESV fans.

I picked up the issue of OXM, not really a lot to add, anyway:

Some details on weapon modification, If you want to modify your weapon, take it to an arms dealer. they give an example of adding a scope to a pistol, and the adding a larger magazine (however, a larger mag takes longer to reload)

The devs want you to grow attached to your tech, rather than throwing it away when it rusts solid

The start involves receiving 2 bullets to the head from an unknown source

There is now an age slider

Victor (the robot from the trailer) isn't exactly clear on his motivation for saving you

Your first objectives are to find who tried to kill you, what you were carrying (and why they wanted it) and why you were ferrying it across the Mojave in the first place.

the ghoul in the pictures is Raul, the hostage kept by Tabitha

No matter what options you take at the start of the game you will start with a Vault 21 jumpsuit, a Pistol and a Pip Boy 3000

There is a picture of the rorschach test, assuming the person in the pic is the doc, then he is not a ghoul.

Stimpacks are no longer an instant hit in hardcoe, and wont fix broken limbs




I did have a longer post but the forums lost it and it's too late at night for me to bother re-typing

So much of this is wrong. Development on Bethesdas next project began well before Fallout 3 was released. They had no reason to start working on a sequel when they didn't know if Fallout 3 would be a success. The copyright or trademark (can't remember which) for "Skyrim" would also suggest ES: V is in fact well under way. They have also started two novels to fill in the gap between IV and V, suggesting V is just around the corner. Besides it has been four years since ES: IV, and Fallout 3 and now Fallout New Vegas has been/will be made very recently/soon. They know they need to give Fallout a rest before it becomes stale, so to fill in the gap, another Elder Scrolls game.

1: Umm, how are geckos a problem? I don't get it.

2: If it was "all blown up", people would probably complain about it being so. Furthermore, nuclear warheads aren't totaly reliable. I welcome the idea of Vegas being the exception, the cockroach that survived unscathed after the bombs dropped.

3: If you're talking about art assets and engine, we really don't have a right to complain given the timeframe (18 months) and likely small budget. This one is likely going to be different in gameplay balance, tone, quality of dialogue and story, choices and consequences, and the dynamics of town interaction (a gameplay element in previous FO's which was completely excluded from FO3).

Couldn't agree more, one of the reasons I loved the pitt is because it wasn't a maze of rubble and dust

Indeed. And also the fact that it's 200+ years after the bombs fell. Pretty sure civilization would've recovered way more than was portrayed in FO3.

Your a idiot bro, to think that there going to NOT make ESV, just because of Fallout. Its not just about the money for Bethesda. They actually make the games that the people want made. And right now, the people want Elderscrolls V.

Im sure thats probably one reason why they gave Obsidian Fallout back (I think...). So they would be able to keep the Fallout fans satisfied, while they work on the next Elderscrolls. The demand for the series to continue is to good to pass up.

Yeah, Bethesda kind've gave back Fallout, I mean Bethesda owns the name and all that now, but obsidian(Formally Black Isle studios, original makers of FO.)

I rather hope not. If Bethesda is planning Fallout 4, I'd like it to take place either in the deep south, Texas, or the heartland (mainly because im a Kansas boy). The East coast dosent nearly get me as exited as the west coast. Exploring different areas of the country that arnt just the coasts could be interesting.

I wouldn't mind more east coast exploration, the commonwealth sounds pretty interesting to me

Thats Massachusetts, right?

What we know so far;

-Kidnapping Sawyer could give us all of the answers.