Why did Bethesda think steam support was a good idea for sky

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 6:11 am

You can turn off in-game overlay and tell steam never to download stuff while you are in a game both options in the steam setup menu if I remeber correctly. :P

if that is true, then they need to make that information more available and also tell us how to do it.
User avatar
Shirley BEltran
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:14 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 8:29 am

Skyrim was my first experience with Steam, and it was NOT good... I bought the game on disc, since downloading 5GB at 38KB/s isn't fun. Then I struggled for two hours to get Steam to install from disc. Then I had to wait another hour and a half to download the 200MB update, since I couldn't (or didn't know how) to prevent it from downloading and would have preferred to play the unpatched version and update while I'm sleeping.

In summary, I hated Steam on 11/11/11. :brokencomputer:

But..... Once everything is working, I realised it's not that bad... If you're looking for a game, you can immediately search for it and won't have to look for a store that sells it. I also like to see the usage statistics and the random news about the game.

So, try looking at Steam objectively and perhaps you will also start liking it. :goodjob:

Just wait til the day you decide to play it and discover there is a 800Mb patch waitting and you can't play the game for a week til it's downloaded ;)
User avatar
Jah Allen
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:09 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 12:43 pm

Because surely Steam causes all the bugs, cant be Bethesda who are new to coding with Steam.

Besthesda is new to coding, period.

The same issues with Arena, were in Daggerfall, Morrowind and Oblivion. Once your "saved game" file got too big, it would crash. You'd suffer random crashes. Pretty much, a lot of what PC gamers are dealing with in Skyrim. And yes, I know there's a lot of other issues with Skyrim, I'm just stating the known problems Bethesda has had in every game of this series.

With that said, how is it possible they still haven't learned how to avoid the problems they've always had in this entire series, going back to TES I: Arena from 1994?

And even with those known problems, I still played those games, and bought Skyrim.

As for Steam, I didn't see the need.

Uldred
User avatar
Kitana Lucas
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 1:48 pm

You can turn the automatic download globaly in the steam setup/settings menu like I said in my other post.


I cannot find it
User avatar
Nick Pryce
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 12:50 am

yes it does it runs updates whenever it has one, and that can occur while your playing, or while your browsing or any damn time it feels like it.

Um no it doesn't it pauses all updates till you exit the game your playing. And even then you can pause all downloads from the Downloads menu. It's not hard all it takes is for people to not be lazy and do the necessary mouse movements.

And in my case I've had zero problems with Steam. I get the occasional CTD but that's always been the case with Bethesda games (Oblivion crashes just as much and it's non-steam). Has nothing to do with steam. My game runs fast and smooth with steam in the background. If yours doesn't then I guess you might wanna look into possible upgrades for your computer. Memory is going cheap on NewEgg right now. Less than $99 for an 8GB kit (if you're on a 64-bit OS).
User avatar
Princess Johnson
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:44 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 10:15 am

I hate steam. I say [censored]'EM. Cheers.
User avatar
Eliza Potter
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:20 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 1:00 pm

Strangely I cannot find Steam in my game.
User avatar
Damian Parsons
 
Posts: 3375
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:48 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 3:29 pm

Piracy is wrong and should be punished, why should I be directed to use a programme I do not want? Will you buy a new comp if you have to buy a second GPU and must use Linux? Why should I suffer from a policy I am not parting of being a not hacker and paying for my hardcopy DVD, and not steam. I want to install it on a comp with no connection what now?

Not one company can force you to use the services of another company for any standalone product.

Go and tell that to Ubisoft :whistling:

I was skeptical of Steam at first, but I kinda like it actually... I think the main reason for them using steam is $$$$ and being able to easy patch the game up
User avatar
elliot mudd
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 8:56 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 11:15 pm

Um no it doesn't it pauses all updates till you exit the game your playing. And even then you can pause all downloads from the Downloads menu. It's not hard all it takes is for people to not be lazy and do the necessary mouse movements.

And in my case I've had zero problems with Steam. I get the occasional CTD but that's always been the case with Bethesda games (Oblivion crashes just as much and it's non-steam). Has nothing to do with steam. My game runs fast and smooth with steam in the background. If yours doesn't then I guess you might wanna look into possible upgrades for your computer. Memory is going cheap on NewEgg right now. Less than $99 for an 8GB kit (if you're on a 64-bit OS).

CPU: AMD Phenom II 6-core 3.200Mhz 1090T Black Box Edition
MOBO: Asus Crosshair V Formula 990FX mobo 1333
GPU: Sapphire ATI HD6950 2048MB DDR5
RAM: Corsair 8GB DDR3 RAM 1333
Primary: Corsair Force 3 90GB SSD 550/500
Secundary: WD 1TB 8.9/64/7200
PS: OCZ 700W

I have 60 FPS generally and down to 30-40 in cities, some dips go as low as 15 FPS

But CTDs occur randomly, especially if you save less often, it somewhat decreased with running no background programmes, meaning 1-2 hours of gameplay with no CTDs

However I object to the policy that I have to use services I do not want at all.
User avatar
Kara Payne
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:47 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 3:03 am

However I object to the policy that I have to use services I do not want at all.

I did too at first, the bare thought of having a program to run a game disgusted me. But after using steam for some time I got used to it. And I actually think steam is pretty hand now, a easy way to support indies and some of those steam sales are awesome!
User avatar
NIloufar Emporio
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:18 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 5:28 am

The fact you would say you don't know what DRM is but then argue that Steam is pointless rather negates your point, DRM is a method used for combating piracy and Bethesda aren't alone in using Steam for this exclusively, Sports Interactive changed to Steam only for their FM12 release. While piracy will never be totally iradicated by any method it does seem Steam is the most effective. Also I have over 50 games from Steam and have never had a problem at all. I don't think it's ever even registered on the CPU usage except when downloading games, and then it was using between 1 and 2% of my CPU!

I've heard rumour of Skyrim torrents for PC being out quite a while. I actually checked it out (not downloading, just checking the Arrrrr!), and I guess there was 20+ torrents I found. They assumedly work without Steam, as long as you play in a window.

Besthesda is new to coding, period.

The same issues with Arena, were in Daggerfall, Morrowind and Oblivion. Once your "saved game" file got too big, it would crash. You'd suffer random crashes.

Not really true. I played on one of my Oblivion saves 200 hours or so, completing everything. No crashes at all.
Same for Morrowind, with more than 100 hours.
User avatar
KIng James
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:54 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 1:08 pm

I did too at first, the bare thought of having a program to run a game disgusted me. But after using steam for some time I got used to it. And I actually think steam is pretty hand now, a easy way to support indies and some of those steam sales are awesome!

Right if you can shop online, I can't, so I don't want it, don't want to look at it or what else. And if people play the game regularly they can find the updates and mods themselves on community sites and official websites.

I sense other things involved, like google, advertising to your needs (thus selling more), monopoly, and just svcking what they can svck up from you.

Don't get me wrong as I like the series, and mod and play Morrowind for years now, probably finished it more than 20 times for a game that has cost me 6 euros.

But I just don't like the way it is going, lets say tooo industrial.
User avatar
Susan
 
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:46 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 11:33 pm

As a DRM, Steam is pretty piss poor. What it does offer, though, is that it makes resale or trading nearly impossible. Unless you sell the entire Steam account.
User avatar
Stace
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 2:52 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 11:55 am

[quote name='Praedator' timestamp='1321377659' post='19250897']But I just don't like the way it is going, lets say tooo industrial./quote]

I agree, feels like some developers just make games for profit, and not for enjoyment.
User avatar
keri seymour
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:09 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 3:20 am

The fact you would say you don't know what DRM is but then argue that Steam is pointless rather negates your point, DRM is a method used for combating piracy and Bethesda aren't alone in using Steam for this exclusively, Sports Interactive changed to Steam only for their FM12 release. While piracy will never be totally iradicated by any method it does seem Steam is the most effective. Also I have over 50 games from Steam and have never had a problem at all. I don't think it's ever even registered on the CPU usage except when downloading games, and then it was using between 1 and 2% of my CPU!

Its not Steams DRM that is effective at fighting piracy though, (It is one of the weakest DRMs on the market (and a quick search shows that skyrim was uploaded on various torrentsites on the 10th of november)), It is the fact that it is piss easy to buy stuff from steam, after a day at work i don't want to go downtown and shop for games, movies, music, etc, i'm way too tired for that, I want to start the download, go and make dinner and have it ready to play after i've eaten, Steam gives me that, If you make it easy enough for people to do the right thing then quite many of them will.

(Obviously not everyone has a creditcard and €50 is alot of money for alot of people, but if we can make it even easier to pay then i think alot of those people will do so once prices drop to a level they can afford) (If the operator charges weren't so insane then i think SMS payments would be awesome as pretty much all kids today get their first phone quite a long time before they get their first credit card)

I'm also fairly certain that publishers get a better deal from valve if they choose to make the game steam exclusive.
User avatar
Brian LeHury
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 6:54 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 12:03 pm

I haven't bought anything that ISN'T on Steam (with the exception of GOG.COM titles) in years.

This is also the first game I've paid full price for in all those years too (just couldn't wait). Their sales alone are worth it. I've also never had any technical problems with the Steam client or trouble playing in offline mode when my cable goes out.
User avatar
Nicole M
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:31 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 10:24 am

As it stands right now, once you've unlocked Skyrim using Steam, you don't need to use Steam to run Skyrim

1. Quit steam, completely.

2. Go to your ..\Steam\steamapps\common\skyrim and find TESV.exe

3. Double-click TESV.exe

play Skyrim sans Steam
User avatar
Antonio Gigliotta
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:39 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 4:06 am

There was no need for Steam. All it did in my case was to authorise the install, now I have Steam disabled and I start my game from the exe.

I hate it when I decide to play a Steam game I haven't played in a while, only to discover that I HAVE to wait 2 or 3 hours while Steam INSISTS on patching it up, even if it was perfectly playable before. They should fix that IMO and have the patch download separately and inform you when it's there, then you can choose to install it, and your game remains accessible all the time.
User avatar
Emmie Cate
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:01 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 9:21 am

also why not give the option to play with or without steam, let the gamer choose what they want?
User avatar
James Hate
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Mon May 28, 2012 11:29 pm

also why not give the option to play with or without steam, let the gamer choose what they want?

Because Steam gives them convenient DRM, a way to track player statistics, rigs, and game problems, and an extremely convenient way to patch. Furthermore, it gives them the ability to seamlessly add in for-pay content updates.

They could have done this all on their own, but that would have required more time and, worse of all, it would have required me to download yes another Steam-like program. I don't want a Steam-like program on my rig for EVERY single publisher.
User avatar
Stephanie I
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:28 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 1:40 pm

Because Steam gives them convenient DRM, a way to track player statistics, rigs, and game problems, and an extremely convenient way to patch. Furthermore, it gives them the ability to seamlessly add in for-pay content updates.

They could have done this all on their own, but that would have required more time and, worse of all, it would have required me to download yes another Steam-like program. I don't want a Steam-like program on my rig for EVERY single publisher.

But I do not want to cooperate in any of their statistics at all, especially not if I am not given the choice.

This is marketing, and they are not after your potatoes

What if all info is hacked, and you come home and see your brandnew gaming PC is gone?

I just don't want that.
User avatar
Tom Flanagan
 
Posts: 3522
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:51 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 2:51 pm

Steam doesn't force you to take part in it's hardware statistics, it asks about once a month or so if you'd like submit your current configuration.

Also, to-date, no one has lost their Steam account via hacking unless they were careless in handling their account.\

Honestly, I can't believe there are PC gamers out there that DON'T use Steam, it's the only thing that's kept the platform alive for several years now.
User avatar
saharen beauty
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:54 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 3:23 pm

Steam doesn't force you to take part in it's hardware statistics, it asks about once a month or so if you'd like submit your current configuration.

Also, to-date, no one has lost their Steam account via hacking unless they were careless in handling their account.\

Honestly, I can't believe there are PC gamers out there that DON'T use Steam, it's the only thing that's kept the platform alive for several years now.

I am one of them, well until Skyrim, and I know many more
User avatar
krystal sowten
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:25 pm

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 3:48 am

My question is... if 10 years down the line... if Steam isn't around.... will I still be able to play this game? Or even if it is around will it have the servers to support it?
I guess what I am asking is after installed, can you play it with out steam at all?

This game has replay-abilty potential. I can see myself a few years down with the urge to play it...kind of like Diablo II. I am always amazed with how many players still play that game online.
User avatar
Angela
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:33 am

Post » Tue May 29, 2012 2:34 pm

Normally, I would easily argue most games that use steam is a good thing, but in this case I would have to disagree. And I usually do find steam useful, but when I try to play Skyrim with it, I also have issues with the game. I have read other posts on the forums here, where some have turned off the steam client support for Skyrim, and those issues seem to clear up afterward. also in addition to this reason, I also would have to note the lack of a multiplayer function to Skyrim, and the steam client is solely built for multiplayer games, any game that doesn't have it, and uses steam support, is a serious waste of resources.

So i have to ask, based on that experience, "Why did Bethesda think steam support was a good idea for Skyrim?" clearly it is causing some of the issues with the game right now, so if they really want to fix this quickly, they should at the very least patch in a temporary break from the steam client, at least till steam can fix their client instability. I don't understand why it is causing all this trouble, but clearly it is.

Steam uses less then 80 MB of ram and that is when you have the community interface activated it is around 30-50 MB without it, which might as well be nothing today. It also uses less then 1% of CPU power. What ever problem people are having, it is not Steam, it is the game or their system. Also, Steam was not built solely for Multilayer, not even sure where you got that idea, I mean come on, it has cloud saving just how many Multiplayer games have a save function? Steam was created for many things, and multi player is only one of them. Even then, Steam is free for publishers to use. Thats right, Bethesda does not pay Valve for the use of Steam. If a publisher does not want to pay any money to Valve for Steam, they just don't get a presence in the Steam Store, but the customer and the publisher still gets all the benefits of Steam/Steamworks. So using any other DRM would actually be a waste of resources, Steam is the only DRM that potentially gives added value to the customer.
User avatar
Evaa
 
Posts: 3502
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:11 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim