Not trying to pick on Evilfish, but this is exactly the type of argument that I was refering to in my earlier post. "I won't believe without proof, I reject any proof presented, I declare there is no proof"
Consider this for a moment. The science of Physics tells us that the amount of energy in a closed system remains constant. The human body contains an amount of energy used to move, think, reason, create, communicate, ect.. When a person dies suddenly, what happens to that energy? Where does it go? Science says that it cannot be destroyed and therefore it must be transferred to another area. The theory is that spirits are this energy that has left a body, so a tool used to detect energy should detect a spirit. Does this mean that all energy is spirits, not hardly. EMF detectors were designed for other uses and will still find things like faulty wiring, so EMF is not proof per se, but it does fit with the theory.
Consider this for a moment. The science of Physics tells us that the amount of energy in a closed system remains constant. The human body contains an amount of energy used to move, think, reason, create, communicate, ect.. When a person dies suddenly, what happens to that energy? Where does it go? Science says that it cannot be destroyed and therefore it must be transferred to another area. The theory is that spirits are this energy that has left a body, so a tool used to detect energy should detect a spirit. Does this mean that all energy is spirits, not hardly. EMF detectors were designed for other uses and will still find things like faulty wiring, so EMF is not proof per se, but it does fit with the theory.
Unproven theories are proof of unproven phenomenon?
