I require a certain amount of scientific evidence before I 'believe' in something.
...
I've sat through a few of those 'Most Haunted' type programs, and it always baffles me when they get these 'experts' in with all of this ghost hunting equipment, flash it around and say 'we're picking up an unusually high level of electromagnetism in this room, it's haunted'. Why the heck would ghosts have an unusually high level of electromagnetism?
...
I'm not going to say outrightly that ghosts don't exist. That there's more to this universe than what we see in front of us. But I'm damn well not going to claim that these things are real until I see some real evidence. And there hasn't been a shred of it yet.
Not trying to pick on Evilfish, but this is exactly the type of argument that I was refering to in my earlier post. "I won't believe without proof, I reject any proof presented, I declare there is no proof"
Consider this for a moment. The science of Physics tells us that the amount of energy in a closed system remains constant. The human body contains an amount of energy used to move, think, reason, create, communicate, ect.. When a person dies suddenly, what happens to that energy? Where does it go? Science says that it cannot be destroyed and therefore it must be transferred to another area. The theory is that spirits are this energy that has left a body, so a tool used to detect energy should detect a spirit. Does this mean that all energy is spirits, not hardly. EMF detectors were designed for other uses and will still find things like faulty wiring, so EMF is not proof per se, but it does fit with the theory.