I think the discussion about sci-fi vs fantasy is missing the piont of why there are varying amounts of frustration with this text, or at least I share many of the same sentiments as those complaining, but for entirely different reasons.
That is, I have no problem at all with the core content of the story (in fact I think it is quite splendid) or with any of the individual elements or ideas which it puts forth (those are all fine as well).
My issue comes rather with the presentation, in that echoing what somebody else mentioned, it *feels* like a fanfic. At first I just thought it was the style of the story (that is, something that is meant to be an outline of a comic), but even along those lines it still has a wrong feel; beyond the basic core which is quite strong and interesting it feels amatuerish.
The chief way these seems to play in is that it feels like it's trying to do entirely too much. We have developed the term 'Kirkbridian' to describe a certian flow and feel and style of writing. This text is like somebody took that style overboard, and again, tried to do too much at once. There is the technobabble, the mythic implications, the crude language (that has generally been limited to Nordic tales, and has been made even more crude here), and then trying to tell a story while experimenting with various forms (links) and then trying to fashion something ooc into it as well.
Essentially, it strikes me as if one of the fanfic writers got ahold of some cool idea and then took all the elements of this style of writing which is so popular amongst us and crammed it all in. The base arc is cool, the presentation (and especially the character interaction, and characterization overall actually) is rather lame. Actually, that is probably one of my chief qualms, the characters are boring and not believeable as characters - they've been given this odd slant (which while quirky and weird) deosn't actually create 'interesting' characters apart from their flairs.
Perhaps I've just rambled and not been clear, probably because it's difficult to say just what it is that is so off.
You really are starting to sound like MK.
I've always sounded more or less like this.
Don't let her trick you - check out the TIL's Old Storyboard if you don't believe me. Besides, anybody sounding like that is something that's only arisen within the past few years.
You can say that something doesn't match your preferred vision of Tamriel (be it Numinatus, the Aludaggas, or King Edward), but you can't quite say that it doesn't match some official version of Tamriel because there is no official version.
If you're expecting this stuff to show in games... it's not going to. The most we'll get is references, unless Bethesda decides to make another spinoff featuring it. Why? Precisely for the reasons you outline. People expect swords and sorcery, mothships don't natively fit into that mix. Same reason we're not going to get complex metaphysical explanations. It's just not a good business move.
Or more likely, because they have no affiliation with any of the ideas presented, not that I'm presenting that to their (or this or any other text's) detriment. 'Lore Forum lore' as somebody put it, is really quite distinct from Bethesda/Official lore; it won't be in any games because they operate in a different world. We all know what is meant by the 'official' Tamriel, despite whatever rhetoric we may use to blur it; in your own words, it is the difference between "the lore as seen by Bethesda, [&] just on our personal interpretation of it." Granted, you're not going to get caught using the word "official", since that's a dirty word in these circles, but the implication is the same (and implications are all that really matter in language).