Got a New Rifle, Need a Nickname

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 8:47 am

Damn! How did you get it so fast?!

:lol:

I'm guessing it's the chap from Full Metal Jacket in your avatar, possibly even in the process of yelling it...
User avatar
sw1ss
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:02 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 9:43 pm

:lol:

I'm guessing it's the chap from Full Metal Jacket in your avatar, possibly even in the process of yelling it...

It is Gunnery Sgt. Hartman. And could guess, but it is a different scene! :P

But yes, it is from the movie Full Metal Jacket, The Tallest made a reference earlier above too!
User avatar
Spencey!
 
Posts: 3221
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:18 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 10:23 pm

I like what Joker said earlier, maybe even modify to fit something more about you or something you know? That would be pretty cool.


"Tonight you pukes will sleep with your rifles. You will give your rifle a girl's name"

:P

(Anyone get the reference?)

Are you quitting on me?! Then quit. Get off my obstacle!

And yes, that is the proper way to say your calibers of ammunition. So, 7.62 would be said, seven-six-two millimeter. And full metal jacket is the type of round. Generally it's a soft core bullet encased in a softer metal, usually copper.

User avatar
Greg Cavaliere
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:31 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 3:04 am

And yes, that is the proper way to say your calibers of ammunition. So, 7.62 would be said, seven-six-two millimeter. And full metal jacket is the type of round. Generally it's a soft core bullet encased in a softer metal, usually copper.

I've just never heard it said like that: my "Hollywood" comment is based on me getting rather suspicious thanks to horrid phrases like "lock and load" and calling a magazine a "clip". The jacket's actually a slightly tougher metal than the core so that the rifling doesn't strip it off due to the high velocities attained by modern propellants; though the opposite is true for armour-piercing bullets where the hard steel core would destroy the rifling.
User avatar
Cody Banks
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:30 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 8:45 am

Are you quitting on me?! Then quit. Get off my obstacle!

And yes, that is the proper way to say your calibers of ammunition. So, 7.62 would be said, seven-six-two millimeter. And full metal jacket is the type of round. Generally it's a soft core bullet encased in a softer metal, usually copper.

Such a great scene! Or "What is this Mickey Mouse [censored]!?"

And what you also say is true.
User avatar
Francesca
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:26 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 10:11 pm



Such a great scene! Or "What is this Mickey Mouse [censored]!?"

And what you also say is true.

Such a great movie.

'I bet you could svck a golf ball through a garden hose!'
User avatar
Brentleah Jeffs
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:21 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 10:57 pm

What is this, the Bungie forums?
User avatar
Chase McAbee
 
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 5:59 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 1:26 am

Boomstick
User avatar
kevin ball
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:02 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 1:10 am

My first rifle in boot was named 'Lucy', after the Peanuts, because it was a crabby [censored] of a weapon.

My first rifle issued to me in the fleet was christened 'Jane', as in calamity.

When I was issued my DMR, I simply named it 'Elvis', because it rocked.


A weapon without a name is a weapon without a soul.

And that's just plain barbaric.
User avatar
Doniesha World
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:12 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 12:57 am

In honor of Simo H?yh?, who used a similar Mosin-Nagant (with over 505 sniper kills during the Winter War) I suggest naming it Belaya Smert or "White Death."

I think that would be appropriate if it was a Finnish capture/made Mosin, but it's probably not, seeing as most Mosin's on the market are Russian.

I've just never heard it said like that: my "Hollywood" comment is based on me getting rather suspicious thanks to horrid phrases like "lock and load" and calling a magazine a "clip". The jacket's actually a slightly tougher metal than the core so that the rifling doesn't strip it off due to the high velocities attained by modern propellants; though the opposite is true for armour-piercing bullets where the hard steel core would destroy the rifling.

Those terms are often actually used in the military. For example, when a soldier says he/she's "locked and loaded", it means their gun has a round in the chamber ready to be fired, yet the safety is on so they can't, hence "locked and loaded".

What someone loads a pistol or M16/assault rifles nowadays with, is called a magazine, they're never called clips. Clips are used in rifles like from WW2 and so forth that are mostly bolt action, though one exception is the British Lee-Enfield. It did have a detachable box magazine, but it was always loaded with two clips, instead of taking out the magazine. Saving time and weight, not having to carry multiple magazines.
User avatar
Chris Duncan
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 11:44 pm

My first rifle in boot was named 'Lucy', after the Peanuts, because it was a crabby [censored] of a weapon.

My first rifle issued to me in the fleet was christened 'Jane', as in calamity.

When I was issued my DMR, I simply named it 'Elvis', because it rocked.


A weapon without a name is a weapon without a soul.

And that's just plain barbaric.

Weapons are just tools. Perhaps that is something they teach you in the military, to see it not as a tool, so that you grow attached to it and become desensitized to the fact that the only purpose of it is to kill.
User avatar
Natalie Harvey
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:15 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 2:58 am

A weapon without a name is a weapon without a soul.

And that's just plain barbaric.
Yeah, but when you have the better part of 40 handguns and 10 rifles that's one hell of a family to name :P.
User avatar
JESSE
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:55 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 1:14 am

I like what Joker said earlier, maybe even modify to fit something more about you or something you know? That would be pretty cool.


"Tonight you pukes will sleep with your rifles. You will give your rifle a girl's name"

:tongue:

(Anyone get the reference?)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=goDPezNGwVo#t=128s

???
User avatar
Sophie Louise Edge
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:09 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 11:54 pm

Weapons are just tools. Perhaps that is something they teach you in the military, to see it not as a tool, so that you grow attached to it and become desensitized to the fact that the only purpose of it is to kill.
That's an absolutely false, common mindset. Anybody who collects firearms will tell you that the sole purpose isn't to kill.

Gun collecting is a hobby. It's the same as stamp collecting or coin collecting.

My father and I collect guns, and I've never killed so much as a mouse with a BB gun.

EDIT: By the way, I've never been in the army.
User avatar
Jesus Sanchez
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:15 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 12:53 am

My first rifle issued to me in the fleet was christened 'Jane', as in calamity.

Either that's a big cliche for a gun's name, or just a weird coincidence, but a buddy of mine when we were in Afghanistan called his SAW "Jane".
User avatar
Alessandra Botham
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:27 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 4:27 pm



My first rifle in boot was named 'Lucy', after the Peanuts, because it was a crabby [censored] of a weapon.

My first rifle issued to me in the fleet was christened 'Jane', as in calamity.

When I was issued my DMR, I simply named it 'Elvis', because it rocked.


A weapon without a name is a weapon without a soul.

And that's just plain barbaric.


Andy you totally missed an opportunity to make a old timer joke there. Like, "When I was issued my first Flintrock I called it X".
Sloppy.
User avatar
Astargoth Rockin' Design
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:51 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 6:16 am

Gun collecting is a hobby.

You can collect almost anything. That doesn't mean those things were made to be collected. Being collected isn't a function of an item.
User avatar
Amy Gibson
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 12:52 am

You can collect almost anything. That doesn't mean those things were made to be collected. Being collected isn't a function of an item.
And you think that the only function of a gun is to kill something?

Like I said, I've never killed anything with a firearm. I've been using firearms since my dad deemed me mature enough (probably around 9 years ago or so), and I've used them on countless occasions, but only even on paper targets and inanimate objects.

The PURPOSE (as you call it) of a firearm is to shoot. What is shot is up to the user.
User avatar
Manuela Ribeiro Pereira
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:24 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 8:07 am

And you think that the only function of a gun is to kill something?

Yes. Training with a weapon doesn't suggest it is no longer a weapon, in fact quite the opposite.
User avatar
neen
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:19 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 3:12 am

Yes. Training with a weapon doesn't suggest it is no longer a weapon, in fact quite the opposite.
You didn't read my edit.

Besides, I never said I was training ;).
User avatar
Hot
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:22 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 6:28 am

Weapons are just tools. Perhaps that is something they teach you in the military, to see it not as a tool, so that you grow attached to it and become desensitized to the fact that the only purpose of it is to kill.

You're very wrong about what the military teaches someone. Never does the military train someone to think of a gun other than a tool, but a tool they're to use to kill someone, but a tool none the less. Naming your gun has nothing to do with desensitizing the soldier, because while your gun may have a nickname, the training that actually takes place, never lets you forget that the machine in your hand, is going to be used mainly as a tool for killing.
User avatar
cosmo valerga
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:21 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 2:12 am

You're very wrong about what the military teaches someone. Never does the military train someone to think of a gun other than a tool, but a tool they're to use to kill someone, but a tool none the less. Naming your gun has nothing to do with desensitizing the soldier, because while your gun may have a nickname, the training that actually takes place, never lets you forget that the machine in your hand, is going to be used mainly as a tool for killing.
+1

Additionally, I fail to see your reasoning behind why you think naming a gun desensitizes killing to the operator. If someone is being attached to it due to the name, they'd be far more inclined to be overly-sensitized and have stronger feelings about the acts performed. The only way to desensitize it would be to distance oneself from it, which is exactly the opposite of what is happening in this situation.
User avatar
JERMAINE VIDAURRI
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:06 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 7:20 am

Andy you totally missed an opportunity to make a old timer joke there. Like, "When I was issued my first Flintrock I called it X".
Sloppy.
It was an arquebus actually not a flintlock, and her name was 'Marielle', after a Parisian madam I knew at the time, who also had a big mouth..


Either that's a big cliche for a gun's name, or just a weird coincidence, but a buddy of mine when we were in Afghanistan called his SAW "Jane".
It's a popular name for rifles I guess :shrug:

A guy at the range has a SL8 he named 'Janis', but that's because he's a big Joplin fan :biggrin:

Weapons are just tools. Perhaps that is something they teach you in the military, to see it not as a tool, so that you grow attached to it and become desensitized to the fact that the only purpose of it is to kill.
What Doc and Xray says.. :)
User avatar
Nina Mccormick
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:38 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 5:21 am

Those terms are often actually used in the military. For example, when a soldier says he/she's "locked and loaded", it means their gun has a round in the chamber ready to be fired, yet the safety is on so they can't, hence "locked and loaded".

Maybe it's an Americanism: I haven't heard it used here, except in films and TV programmes, which is why I assumed it was a Hollywood/CoD cliché. My guess about "locked" based on the assumption of authenticity is that it had a magazine locked in place, but perhaps not.

What someone loads a pistol or M16/assault rifles nowadays with, is called a magazine, they're never called clips. Clips are used in rifles like from WW2 and so forth that are mostly bolt action, though one exception is the British Lee-Enfield. It did have a detachable box magazine, but it was always loaded with two clips, instead of taking out the magazine. Saving time and weight, not having to carry multiple magazines.

Referring to box magazines as clips drives me nuts. I wish people wouldn't do it. The Lee Enfield is indeed loaded with stripper clips, as you say, like many other rifles; the box magazine was rarely removed though, only for cleaning and maintenance (edit: as you also say; reading comprehension fail on my part, again.) We have one lying around here, though it's deactivated: it's decades since I last fired one. :(
User avatar
Hot
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:22 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 6:27 pm

Maybe it's an Americanism: I haven't heard it used here, except in films and TV programmes, which is why I assumed it was a Hollywood/CoD cliché. My guess about "locked" based on the assumption of authenticity is that it had a magazine locked in place, but perhaps not.

During my time in the Sandbox, I heard a few Brits use the term. Could have been they were just messing around, but I'm pretty sure it's a somewhat fairly used Western military term outside the US as well. It might just be however, that US war films like to say it more for dramatic effect, than other countries war movies?
User avatar
Flesh Tunnel
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:43 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games