Now while much of Skyrim is a little kiddish, it`s still quite a bit more `real` than Oblivion which I believe was 16 rated.
Now isn`t Skyrim 15 or 16 rated? How did they manage to include the depiction of someone having their head cut off- at least twice and more when you level up, without the rating being uped to 18?
When Gladiator was being made, they had to show decapitations only with someone in a fullface helmet otherwise the movie would`ve been 18.
I dunno. Nudity is a big no. no or 18 rated, but much graphic blood letting is fine. Humans are strange.
Way back, 30 or so years, when Page 3 was the only general exception to the official UK prudishness and movies such as Driller Killer and Texas Chainsaw Massacre were outright banned, I remember seeing decapitations and hangings on TV! Historical drama; Henry the 8th, French Revolution, even just general period pieces - I remember one about Casanova, ooh la la - were allowed a certain leeway. It makes sense, a society which censors history is built on a very slippery slope. So, decapitations, especially when officially sanctioned executions, have a historical precedence. I see no reason for alarm.
Gratuitous violence, especially stylistically gratuitous violence and especially when rendered in slow motion is a different matter. When there are a dozen different ways to maim a person, or a sufficiently realistic rendition there of, all animated in intricate detail then one must question if the violence itself is pormographic - it exists to satisfy the lust for blood. While some do find such a level of violence objectionable I do not think it is generally harmful, this is a video game after all and no one in their right mind or of sufficient maturity is going to realise darker aspects of such in real life. The same comment can of course be applied to sixual pormography and it's interesting to see how standards have changed over the brief history of video games and how game developers have adjusted their products to comply.
Ted Peterson, lead designer of Daggerfall made this comment:
And then there was the rating system, which is more black humor than anything else. Between Arena and Daggerfall, the United States Congress, led by Senator -- nearly vice-president -- Joe Lieberman, had decided that we needed to have a rating system on computer games to save the kids. I got a questionaire for Daggerfall which was obviously made for much simpler games. It asked questions like "Is there nudity in this game?" "Yes." "Is there bloodshed?" "Yes." "Can an innocent person be killed?" "Yes." "Can there be a reward for killing an innocent person?" "Yes." We got slapped with the worst rating for a game, needless to say. And later, Lieberman listed us as being one of the top ten worst corrupters of children ... Of course, I'm sure that sold a few units.
Daggerfall: one of the top ten worst corrupter's of children. I don't remember seeing that on the box art and this was only 16 years ago. Okay, a life time for some of you but trust me, not all that ancient really.
So, how has the series changed in response to that damming indictment? Well, the levels of graphical fidelity and violence have gone through the roof. No more 'tink, tink, tink, argh' - that was Dagerfall combat for anyone who missed it - we have visceral, slow-mo, disembowelment replete with blood splatter on the invisible sheet of glass that apparently sits over the player characters face. And nudity? I think the progression of Bioware romance best sums up the typical attitude of western developers towards nudity and six in video games: http://www.i2net.me.uk/files/Pics/EvolutionBiowareRomance.png
tl;dr
Look at the pic at least, one of my favourites and took me some time to hunt down
