Next Dragon Age Will be a Skyrim clone

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 5:15 pm

If they model it after Skyrim then they could have a winner, this is probably just hot air however
User avatar
koumba
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:39 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 5:22 am

They were impressed by a game that just about all of you are enjoying as I type this. They see everything that folks, who are very much their target audience, liked about Skyrim and thought they might draw from that, sort of like everyone that's been inspired by anything ever. How many threads pop up here from people asking for games like The Elder Scrolls? How often do you see Dragon Age compared to The Elder Scrolls in a negative light because the series doesn't have certain features TES does?

Now they're catching flak for "ripping off" your precious Skyrim?

I thought their target audience was people who liked a strategic and complex RPG experience, but I guess that all changed after DA2. Spiritual sequel to Baldur's Gate, my ass.
User avatar
how solid
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:27 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 4:27 pm

If they model it after Skyrim then they could have a winner, this is probably just hot air however
Little choice, linear dungeons, scaling, generlly rushed and shallow = winner ?

I think im going to have to look to the past to find actual rpgs from now on. The entire genre, is about choices and building a character. Now devs seem intent on pissing nthat way, becuase its "too complex", or some otherr [censored]. You want it to be "accessible" make a new [censored] IP. You want to mke it less complex. Make [censored] action game. Dont however go dragging down the bar on rpgs, ruining them, and trying to sell me an action game, insisting its an rpg. Dont sell me a bike and insist its a car. It may be a very good bike, but its not a bloody car.

So Obsidian, big huge games (KoA guys iirc)... Who else can I actually trust to sell me an rpg these days ? Becuse bethesd and bioware are out, and dont seem like they will change nytime soon.
User avatar
Roberta Obrien
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:43 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 6:09 am

Considering on how DA2 turned out, this maybe an improvement.

Don;t think of DA2 as a separate game, think of it as a $25 (what I paid) add on for DA:O - and using that metric, ti wasn't that bad a deal
User avatar
Stephani Silva
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:11 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 8:35 am

Little choice, linear dungeons, scaling, generlly rushed and shallow = winner ?

I think im going to have to look to the past to find actual rpgs from now on. The entire genre, is about choices and building a character. Now devs seem intent on pissing nthat way, becuase its "too complex", or some otherr [censored]. You want it to be "accessible" make a new [censored] IP. You want to mke it less complex. Make [censored] action game. Dont however go dragging down the bar on rpgs, ruining them, and trying to sell me an action game, insisting its an rpg. Dont sell me a bike and insist its a car. It may be a very good bike, but its not a bloody car.

So Obsidian, big huge games (KoA guys iirc)... Who else can I actually trust to sell me an rpg these days ? Becuse bethesd and bioware are out, and dont seem like they will change nytime soon.

Skyrim is far from perfect, there are plenty of things that can be improved. Having said that however it is still pretty damn good and better than what other RPG games are putting out in recent years imo.

In terms of whether DA 3 is more like Skyrim or DA 2 I think I know what most people would prefer
User avatar
Alexandra Ryan
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:01 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 1:20 pm

Little choice, linear dungeons, scaling, generlly rushed and shallow = winner ?

That RPG's of today for you man.


As for Bioware drawing from Skyrim.... can't think of anything but b/romances in an open world for the outcome.
User avatar
Tiff Clark
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:23 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 9:51 am

DA3

I hope we get a Tranquil for a companion. I know , I know, already a flat character due to the whole no emotions thing but I could see a pretty cool story arch of your PC trying to reclaim the emotions of your companion from the Fade.
User avatar
Mel E
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:23 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 8:56 am

Yeah trend rider. You hugged the console brainless action for DA2, now you embrace the open Skyrim when it's topping Christmas sales chart. That's so intuitive of you.
User avatar
Prisca Lacour
 
Posts: 3375
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:25 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 7:23 am

Well I for one am not going to complain about other RPGs "stealing" the open world concept from TES. There's always been a significant lack of free roaming, open world RPGs. The more the better, I say.
User avatar
Logan Greenwood
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 5:41 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 7:09 am

As long as its a good game, who the hell cares whose using whose ideas?
User avatar
Zach Hunter
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:26 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 4:22 pm

Skyrim is far from perfect, there are plenty of things that can be improved. Having said that however it is still pretty damn good and better than what other RPG games are putting out in recent years imo.

In terms of whether DA 3 is more like Skyrim or DA 2 I think I know what most people would prefer
Fallout new vegas ws out last year, it had choice. I could progress through the gme focused on non combat skills, open world, good writing, etc. Skyrim is not some oasis surrounded by crap. lso even if there were just bad rpgs. That dosent make it good. A car the dosent work, is still bd. Its better than cars that explode and kill you when you start them. But its still bad.

That RPG's of today for you man.


As for Bioware drawing from Skyrim.... can't think of anything but b/romances in an open world for the outcome.
Not all of them. A few (very few) devs I still trust to deliver good rpgs.

They may add something else that looks stupid for the "cool" factor. Like the AC inspired omniblade... But yeah, bioware games (havent played the old) seem to lack substance, they have a cliche story, cliche chracters, and then add fanservice. Still it sells, so it wont change. Shame really, greed ruins games, they made money before. But now everything wants CoD numbers.
User avatar
Stat Wrecker
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:14 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 9:45 am

Can somebody or something please burn down Bioware's HQ already(while it's empty, of course.)?

Defunct developer churning out garbage games.

I don't know what the hell happened. It wasn't even EA.

They've become a toxic force in the gaming industry.
User avatar
liz barnes
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:10 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 9:00 am

My issue is bioware watered down DA2 (and mass effect, but this is about DA). Bethesda watered down skyrim. Instead of actully adding more rpg elements, they are being "inspired" by a watered down rpg. Meaning at best, things stay as shallow as DA2. God I hope they look at kingdoms of Amalur. Atleast then there may be some depth.
Definitely will be depth in Reckoning and I do agree that Bioware should look at that title too considering that their parent company is the publisher.
User avatar
Dan Wright
 
Posts: 3308
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:40 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 4:29 pm

Can somebody or something please burn down Bioware's HQ already(while it's empty, of course.)?

Defunct developer churning out garbage games.

I don't know what the hell happened. It wasn't even EA.

They've become a toxic force in the gaming industry.
A person who isnt blaming E for everything. A rare find on the internet.
Definitely will be depth in Reckoning and I do agree that Bioware should look at that title too considering that their parent company is the publisher.
Its kinda unrelated. But I just saw another reckoning vid. I didnt realise jsut how much they put into the game. It pays off too. The visuals look like an animated film at some points I saw, just flowed so well. Unlike other games wth that artstyle, kinda reminds me of one time playing alan wake and everything, for a few seconds, just, clicks together to make a moment of awesomeness.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARtOCjVTVwM&feature=g-all-lik

Bioware can make DA3 whtever they want TBH. I dont care about them any more. DA2, was horrible (fun to watch the trainwreck though) and mass effect stopped being an rpg, and after reding the ME3 script, I didnt even care about the story. If they want to keep making poor games thats fine. I just wish they wouldnt insist they make rpgs.

God I hate how obvious the edit is with the text colour.
User avatar
Jennifer Rose
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:54 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 2:27 am

Arrrr, Bioware be dead, Arrrrr.
User avatar
mishionary
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:19 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 5:22 am

I must be alone in keeping the faith with Bioware, sure DA 2 was diabolical but all companies are allowed one [censored] up. ME 1 & 2 were both good for me and I can't wait for ME 3 if only to see how it ends.

I have faith they will have learnt from the failings of DA 2 and will correct DA 3 to be better
User avatar
Keeley Stevens
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:04 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 3:07 pm

I think it'd be a good thing for DA to be more like Skyrim in the sense that DA will be more open world. The story can be the worst thing ever, but as long as I have an open world to explore and things to do in it, the game will entertain me and get my money. It should be more like Dragon Age in the story and character depth and personalization area, but be more like Skyrim and allow nearly every bit of the world were in to be explored.

I wouldn't mind seeing another NWN game either, though..more like the first one..which is one of my favorites.
User avatar
Bryanna Vacchiano
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 7:27 am


My issue is bioware watered down DA2 (and mass effect, but this is about DA). Bethesda watered down skyrim. Instead of actully adding more rpg elements, they are being "inspired" by a watered down rpg. Meaning at best, things stay as shallow as DA2. God I hope they look at kingdoms of Amalur. Atleast then there may be some depth.

Bethesda's own TES systems from the attributes to dialogue is seen as a very bad system. It's funny that Morrowind is seen as a large impact or "real RPG" around here when at launch Morrowind seemed barely classified as a system full of linear quests and attributes only counting towards combat rather than standing on their own and impacting everythingelse done. The lack of depth is why Skyrim functions fine when the attributes are stripped down: Because there was none in the first place.

But I'll glide past that, these topics were talked to death for an entire year fiercely.

It's a fact that after Daggerfall BGS's RPGs were severely lacking and even a few Morrowind devs themselves were disappointed and quit.

However Skyrim does measure back to atleast Morrowind standards and so isn't quite as bad as Oblivion nor Fallout 3. I'd cast FO3 as a better game than Oblivion however OB had more RPG mechanics by a far number and BGS missed the boat in everything about designing and crafting a Fallout game. That they actually employed dungeons in FO is ridiculous among a vast number of other things.

Skyrim matches up to Morrowind though more than not, a few arbitrary dice rolls MW had aside that didn't make it any more of an "Arpeegee" than DA 2.

A higher benchmark of RPG should be placed for BGS to follow than Morrowind. Morrowind's biggest credance at launch was being a shinier Ultima Underworld.

As for Kingdom's of Amalur, it's nothing special. Another action RPG that throws in a bunch of mechanics and suddenly all is forgiven. At present it looks uninspired and full of QTE's. Actually, the number of mechanics matches Skyrim. I guess their both clearly the level of Planescape: Torment, Wasteland, or Fallout suddenly.

Higher benchmarks need to be placed on BGS. They have great world building skills. It's everything else that they quite need a lot of help in.

As for Bioware, being under EA one can guess anything.

I was never impressed by Balder's Gate. I consider the likes of Bioware just feeding the leftovers of Black Isle after they made WRPGs feasible again to jRPGs.
User avatar
Sammygirl500
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:46 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 3:38 am

I must be alone in keeping the faith with Bioware, sure DA 2 was diabolical but all companies are allowed one [censored] up. ME 1 & 2 were both good for me and I can't wait for ME 3 if only to see how it ends.

I have faith they will have learnt from the failings of DA 2 and will correct DA 3 to be better
You may like it, but after reading the script. If you expecting a good story, with choices from previous games having impact... The less said the better tbh.

I advise you save your money. I genuinely think its a bad game, I may be bitter about bioware, but they lied to their customers (choices mattering), and well I just dont see anything good about ME3, writing, gameplay, nothing stands out.

You cn have faith in them, hell I heared how horrible Alpha protocol was, tried it and enjoyed it. But story is an issue. it would ruin it, but I advise finding out about the writing, before buying it. Or atleast waiting until a price drop.
User avatar
Amber Hubbard
 
Posts: 3537
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:59 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 4:45 pm

I must be alone in keeping the faith with Bioware, sure DA 2 was diabolical but all companies are allowed one [censored] up. ME 1 & 2 were both good for me and I can't wait for ME 3 if only to see how it ends.

I have faith they will have learnt from the failings of DA 2 and will correct DA 3 to be better
Your not alone, I loved Mass Effect 2(haven't played 1) and Dragon Age: Origins is one of my favourite games ever...third actually. They've put out one less then acceptable game(which most people say is terrible only because it followed a game that was as good as Origins) and the majority of the internet now wants to burn their offices to the ground.

Note: The "members reading this topic" bar is back...cool.
User avatar
Georgia Fullalove
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:48 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 2:13 pm

Oh please, as much as I love Origins Bioware would fail at making a game like TES. You can't even jump in Dragon Age.
Why would you care about jumping in a tactical combat RPG like DA? Do people not understand that DA and TES are two completely different types of games?

Also, OP, your thread title is a wee bit sensationalist, dontcha think? :tongue: Saying that Skyrim has them thinking about open world designs is nowhere close to "OMG we gunna maek Skyrim too K?" I mean, nobody else on the internet exaggerates or blows things out of proportion. Evar.
User avatar
adame
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:57 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 2:58 am

...sure DA 2 was diabolical...

Well some people said Diablo 2 was too draconian. :P
User avatar
hannaH
 
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:50 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 3:23 pm

Your not alone, I loved Mass Effect 2(haven't played 1) and Dragon Age: Origins is one of my favourite games ever...third actually. They've put out one less then acceptable game(which most people say is terrible only because it followed a game that was as good as Origins) and the majority of the internet now wants to burn their offices to the ground.

Pretty much how I feel. I have been playing Bioware games since all the way back to BG2. Outside of DA2, I have never been disappointed by their games. They tried to take the changes they made to Mass Effect 2, which, for the most part, made an even better game,(at least in my opinion), and tried to fit them into Dragon Age, but it failed. I am hoping that they have really learned from DA2, that they took the fan's issues into consideration, and sometime next year (preferably later), they release another great title in the Dragon Age series.

The issue I have with the article, however, is that they say they are going to look to Skyrim, an entirely different type of rpg, for inspiration for their next Dragon Age game. I feel they just need to look to their past games, Origins, or even Baldur's Gate, the series that this really builds off of, and use that, combined with the wants of the fans, to get an idea of where to take the series. People had little issue with Origins as a whole. From what I have seen, they just need to give us more of that. Work in some new ideas, obviously, just as any decent sequel would, but give us largely the same experience we had the first time around.
User avatar
Ross Zombie
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 6:11 am

How about making a Dragon Age game for Dragon Age: Origins fans? They failed at making one for Call of Duty fans, and now they want to make one for Skyrim fans...
User avatar
no_excuse
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:56 am

Post » Sat May 12, 2012 2:37 pm

Good. Bioware has been making the same game with a different graphics pack over, and over, and over, and over. They need to change something, badly.
User avatar
Conor Byrne
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:37 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games