Look at big, known PS3-developers like NaughtyDog and Guerilla Games. NaughtyDog created Uncharted 3, a visually stunning game with awesome effects.
Guerilla Games created Killzone 3. A beautiful game waay ahead of its time graphically.
These games are better then Skyrim technically and doesn't even take full advantage of the hardware. That's because they're well-designed games by good developers, unlike you, Bethesda, who develop games with your heads up your a**holes.
So Bethesda, I can now say that your team is made up of amateurs who doesn't know a sh*t about the PS3's architecture.
Hah, those games are rail shooters compared to Skyrim. They have nothing of the complexity that skyrim is composed of and from a "technical" perspective Skyrim is light years ahead of either. Don't get me wrong, they're fun and pretty games, but they don't hold a candle to the difficulty a game like Skyrim poses. The only games you can really compare to it at the moment is the Fallout series, Oblivion and Morrowind. Why? Because it is extremely difficult to create go anywhere, do anything games and yet somehow Bethesda has successfully created that. It svcks that I have it on my PS3, I'll be sure to buy it for my PC from now on like I did with the previous Bethesda games to great success. But it failing on the ps3 has nothing to do with the game being somehow less technilogically advanced, if anything, it speaks to it being even more technically complex.
But Bethesda doesn't really need me to defend them. The fact that so many people are here and upset points out just how much we love their games and WANT this to work on our system. I understand your frustration and your desire to vent, but dismissing the validity of Bethesda's overall accomplishment here is a stretch. If they don't get game of the year for this, I'll be surprised.