Well, I like it as is. I don't like the whole game revolving around just me. It's no fun that way. Everything at a standstill unless your 30 yards away = no fun for me.
Seems like we have a couple of camps here. But here's the thing...if Bethesda ruins my game, which they will, by taking out these attacks... I'll still play the game. I wont be creating petitions. Boycotting, or threatening them with "You are no longer my going to be my favorite series." I'll still play the game and enjoy a much more boring version of itself, IMO.
I totally respect that opinion (along with your opinion about the red wings), but you gotta see where other people are coming from. These attacks generally don't lead to a single villager dying. If you fail to notice these guys, they can wipe out a whole section of a town (a section that won't come back). This breaks certain quests and kills shopkeepers, leaving a ghost towns that actually break the immersion for people.
Addressing your second point though, complaining about this is totally different for someone with your point of view. If they change/remove the attacks (personally I hope they'll just change them), then the only thing you'll have to complain about is that they removed a feature they had only recently added anyway, and that they slightly lowered the amount of immersion you feel.
The other's side has a greater basis for their complaint though. For them, a feature was added that has lead to people suddenly having to deal with random attacks that (as I've already said) kill a lot of NPCs and damage the content that the game already featured.
I am tired of everyone ever complaining about this. These arguments are annoying and too common, and repeat the same points over and over ad infinitum. I do not take a side, and I say that these ought not to exist at all.
So these arguments annoy you, and you're not taking any side here...
Why did are you posting then?