you're right bounce, I misinterpreted what you were trying to say. let me start over
i hate to be 'that guy' but this seems less like a '90s id' vs a '2010s id' issue than it is an 'id software surviving in a 90s industry' vs an 'id software surviving in a 2010s industry' issue
my post is going to be long so i'd rather not have to explain, but will if necessary
90s iD would not have bothered with the butchery and censorship of Doom 2's secret levels for the international release.
until confirmed otherwise, i'd like to believe this was either a simple mistake that will be fixed soon or something they were forced to alter by zenimax/bethesda. I would be very shocked to learn otherwise, although if the latter were the case I'm not sure if they'd tell us
90s iD was willing to innovate in gameplay as well as technology(...) 2010s iD only innovates in technology. Rage tried, but it really didn't bring anything new to the table at all gameplay wise.
this I more or less agree with, even though you contradict your point a bit with the last sentence in the quote (maybe just poor word choice?)
personally (and this sounds awful i know), i continue to come back to id games
because they haven't strayed far from their formula. i pop in an id game when i want a quick fps fix. i dont need a story (what was rage even about? wait i dont care), i dont need COD-style matchmaking, and i definitely dont need lame set-pieces interrupting the flow of the game. these things are annoying to me. the id software logo on the box, to me, represents that I am purchasing a no frills, almost arcade-esque first person shooter with graphics that will still look great in a few years, controls that are incredibly responsive, and a campaign experience that is completely focused on
fun. now, if you tilt your head a little to the side (left or right will do, it doesn't matter), you might see that in a strange way this style of fps game making is becoming more and more rare - and in turn, maybe will start to look... maybe not innovative, but fresh?
i did so much soul-searching just now
i'm not going to try to defend rage or doom 3 bfg... both have had issues out the ass in the eyes of the community, and while i roll my eyes at most of these problems (especially whats going on now with doom 3 bfg edition) these are ultimately for you guys and if they failed you then they failed you. i loved both, personally, and i am grateful that id is releasing more than one game a decade.
Well said Bouncy, someone else who knows history unlike some around here.
if this is directed at me please correct my paper and have it back to me by the weekend, i wont be in class for a while =/