Am I the only one who sees the Imperials as the GOOD GUYS?

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 6:35 am

I was also going to join the Stormcloaks as my character (Dunmer) hates Imperials, but after I found out they are a bunch of racist nords wanting Skyrim for themselves and they demanded an oath in order to join, I steped back. Now I just slaughter every Imperial or Stormcloack I find in my way. Hope I can shout apart Ulfric as wel, but I guess this is a part of the Imperail questline
User avatar
Jason Rice
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:42 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 7:34 am

When I was investigating Margaret's death in Markarth, the Stormcloak troops were always in terrible moods with me, and were just over all ignorant pigs. In the end they ALL tried to kill me and chased me out of the city (I wasn't in the Legion either.) Another time I came across a Stormcloak camp just walking through as a short cut, and they all started attacking me again for no reason (Hadn't started the Civil War quest at all) Legion never did that.
Over all the Legion have been kind to me and the Stormcloaks have just been ignorant.

I like the fact that Skyrim wants independence though, but I also believe they'd be much safer being in the Empire.

The Legion have my loyalty.
User avatar
bonita mathews
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:04 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 10:27 pm

I don't think there is a good guy or a bad guy in this situation, which I really admire from Bethesda. The Nords are just trying to secure their own independence, but they're a bunch of racists and Ulfric just wants power. The Imperials are just trying to maintain stability for the good of the entire Empire. I honestly do not think Skyrim has a better chance of fending off the Altmer than the freaking Empire itself, and thus they are stronger united. Sure, banning the worship of Talos was a bad thing, but the Imperials had to make huge compromises or face annilihation, and they did the best they could.

Skyrim being indepent does not help anyone but the Altmer, in the end. Weakened by the civil war and the withdrawal of Imperial troops, not to mention the Dragons who went to town on the nation, invading Skyrim will be easy for the Thalmor, and the entire Empire will be all the weaker for it. Being part of the White-Gold concordant was the only thing protecting them, and now that they have independence, they lose that protection. Good one, Ulfric.
User avatar
Sharra Llenos
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:09 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 7:55 am

Friends, I do not understand this universal loathing of the Thalmor. If it weren't for them, Tamriel would have been lost to the Oblivion Crisis. These are dark and troubled times, and we live in an age of suffering. As such, sometimes certain.. extreme measures must be taken that would otherwise revolt the civilized instincts of man, beast, and mer alike. This is because we face extraordinary threats to our futures and the futures of our peoples.

For instance, take the Insidious Cult of Talos, which portrays the founder of your Empire as a raving Human Supremacist-turned-God. The continued Nord veneration of Talos is used as a front for the interests of the bloodthirsty Stormcloak savages. They're looking for that special cultist who will commit atrocities in the name of not only Human Superiority, but also Nord Supremacy, to initiate him or her into their 'inner circle'. For you, humans, so that our peoples will never have to cross blades and spill each others blood, it is for your sake that we banned the worship of Talos. For you must recall the outcome of that terrible war. We can coexist without Talos worship, or the Merethic people and Beastmen will stand together against Mankind's reawakened lust for Tyranny, and you will be dealt with in a way that will make the War look like the Emperor's birthday celebration.

(Jeez, i'm starting to appreciate the fun some people have supporting the Enclave. I'd just like to see the Thalmor get 'grayed up' a bit in a Future DLC. )
User avatar
RAww DInsaww
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:47 pm

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 11:21 pm

Never really thought of that way, Jenkem. I still haven't decided on a side yet, because there's always something that bothers me there. May never side, may just go hide in a cave somewhere and let the entire world bite their nails wondering where the dragonborn went. They'll never know he's drinking tons of mead and kicking it with an ice troll.
User avatar
Ross Thomas
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:06 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 4:06 am

Both sides are horrible and corrupt, honestly I'd rather not side with either.

I disagree. Tulius and Rikke are reasonable authority figures. Tulius moreso, he was sent to do a job and he's getting it done.
I haven't played Stormcloak's side yet, but I do know Ulfric's right-hand man is kind of a [censored], more bloodthirsty than people claim of Ulfric himself. But the fact Ulfric holds him in such high esteem makes me like him even less.

Most of my characters choose Imperial side.
User avatar
Louise Lowe
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:08 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 12:25 am

but I do know Ulfric's right-hand man is kind of a [censored], more bloodthirsty than people claim of Ulfric himself. But the fact Ulfric holds him in such high esteem makes me like him even less.

Gamlar Stone-Fist. You should try and listen to him in Windhelm after you have finished the Stormcloak campaign.
Spoiler
He is somewhat broken by all the death and fighting.
User avatar
MatthewJontully
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:33 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 10:51 pm

Gamlar Stone-Fist. You should try and listen to him in Windhelm after you have finished the Stormcloak campaign.
Spoiler
He is somewhat broken by all the death and fighting.

Hm. Fair enough, I'll see for myself at some point.
User avatar
sara OMAR
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:18 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 8:02 am

I still see the Empire as being the only thing which has a chance at stopping the Dominion in the next inevitable war. I wouldn't be surprised if we're going to be seeing more to this conflict in future DLC or even the next title.
I like the fact that even though individuals like Tulius secretly hate the agreement between the Dominion and the Empire, he knows the war is coming but he won't have it start before it's time.
User avatar
FoReVeR_Me_N
 
Posts: 3556
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:25 pm

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 11:58 pm

I can almost sympathize with the Empire. It's in a terrible position.

But that is no excuse. The greatest duty of all men of arms is the protection of the innocent. Those who raise those arms against the innocent, or sheathe them when others do, should have those arms removed.
Lol.

I'm pretty sure their greatest duty is to do as they're told. People do awful things in wars, it's just that the winners tend to write history, and make the others look like the bad guys. Morality doesn't come into it.

EDIT: Besides, Skyrim's independence does not mean that it would simply sit back and allow the empire to burn if it was in its best interests to prevent it. Ulfric already shows he has powers of reason when agreeing to the peace conference. If he thought Skyrim were at risk, he'd temporarily fight alongside the imperials without doubt.
User avatar
Alba Casas
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:31 pm

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 8:39 pm

I want an DLC where mu high elf can joine the Dominion and take over skyrim and enslave the population for the good of all.
User avatar
Kortknee Bell
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:05 pm

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 11:30 pm

I prefer the stormcloaks, but only so Skyrim can be independent. I don't really like Ulfric and I hate his racist views, but the empire is weak and dying and another war with the thalmor is impossible to avoid.

The redguards were able to handle the thalmor by themselves, why can't Skyrim?
Two points:

* The Redguard did not handle the Thalmor 'by themselves'; the Great War is what weakened the Thalmor occupation troops enough in their local area (as they'd sent them to reinforce the Imperial City) for the Redguard to have their shot afterwards. Not to mention all those Legion 'pensioners' left behind for them to recruit.

* The reason the Empire is fragmenting now is because of Ulfric Stormcloak; he chose to start a rebellion in what up until that point had been the province that was the remaining backbone of the Imperial military strength. SOB caused the very problem he's claiming to be the cure of. Isn't that conveeeeeeeeenient.
User avatar
Elea Rossi
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 6:57 am

Didn't the redguards already do that? They kicked the Aldmeri out of Hammerfell by themselves? The Empire has to realize that it's glory days are over, they can continue to fight against it, or acknowledge it, and move on. Besides there's nothing stopping the Nords, High Rock, Redguards, and the remnants of the Empire from allying to suppress the Thalmor. From a historical perspective it happened all the time, nations going from bitter enemies one day, to allies the next.

Take a read http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Skyrim:The_Great_War

Important points.
4E 173
In Hammerfell, Imperial fortunes took a turn for the better. In early 4E 173, a Forebear army from Sentinel broke the siege of Hegathe (a Crown city), leading to the reconciliation of the two factions. Despite this, Lady Arannelya's main army succeeded in crossing the Alik'r Desert. The Imperial Legions under General Decianus met them outside Skaven in a bloody and indecisive clash. Decianus withdrew and left Arannelya in possession of Skaven, but the Aldmeri were too weakened to continue their advance.

4E 174
In Hammerfell, General Decianus was preparing to drive the Aldmeri back from Skaven when he was ordered to march for Cyrodiil. Unwilling to abandon Hammerfell completely, he allowed a great number of "invalids" to be discharged from the Legions before they marched east. These veterans formed the core of the army that eventually drove Lady Arannelya's forces back across the Alik'r late in 174, taking heavy losses on their retreat from harassing attacks by the Alik'r warriors.


In 4E 174, the Thalmor leadership committed all available forces to the campaign in Cyrodiil, gambling on a decisive victory to end the war once and for all. During the spring, Aldmeri reinforcements gathered in southern Cyrodiil, and on 12th of Second Seed, they launched a massive assault on the Imperial City itself. One army drove north to completely surround the city, while Lord Naarifin's main force attacked the walls from the south, east, and west. The Emperor's decision to fight his way out of the city rather than make a last stand was a bold one. No general dared advise him to abandon the capital, but Titus II was proven right in the end.



4E 175: The Battle of the Red Ring

In the end, the main Aldmeri army in Cyrodiil was completely destroyed. The Emperor's decision to withdraw from the Imperial City in 4E 174 was bloodily vindicated.
Not a single legion had more than half its soldiers fit for duty. Two legions had been effectively annihilated, not counting the loss of the Eighth during the retreat from the Imperial City the previous year.

So, what do we have? First, Thalmor forces in Hammerfell suffered heavy losses from Imperials. Then, when Decianus was leaving Hammerfell, he left a number of his soldiers there. At same time, Thalmor dedicated all of it's available forces to Cyrodiil.

Although victorious, the Imperial armies were in no shape to continue the war. The entire remaining Imperial force was gathered in Cyrodiil, exhausted and decimated by the Battle of the Red Ring. Not a single legion had more than half its soldiers fit for duty. Two legions had been effectively annihilated, not counting the loss of the Eighth during the retreat from the Imperial City the previous year. Titus II knew that there would be no better time to negotiate peace, and late in 4E 175 the Empire and the Aldmeri Dominion signed the White-Gold Concordat, ending the Great War.

And only THEN Reguards managed to take on the little part of the original Thalmor's force, and it took em 5 years and huge losses to draw those out.
In the end, the heroic Redguards fought the Aldmeri Dominion to a standstill, although the war lasted for five more years and left southern Hammerfell devastated.

TL;DR - if you support Stormcloacks, you support Thalmor, since Nords alone in no way will be able to survive the next war. Redguards barely managed to deal with a part of a part of Thalmor's forces
User avatar
M!KkI
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:50 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 10:50 pm

To people who hate the Stormcloaks because of Markarth:

Those aren't Stormcloaks, they're corrupt guards that are paid by the corrupt mining family there. They are being helped by Forsworn, the people of are AGAINST the nords and thus against the Stormcloaks.
User avatar
Robert Jr
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 6:42 pm

TL;DR - if you support Stormcloacks, you support Thalmor, since Nords alone in no way will be able to survive the next war. Redguards barely managed to deal with a part of a part of Thalmor's forces
Lol no. supporting Ulfric =/= supporting Thalmor. Like I said previously, Ulfric has already shown a willingness to deal with the Imperials for Skyrim's best interests; there's nothing to suggest he'd try and take them alone after winning his independence. More likely it'd be a case of 'okay we got out country back, now.. who wants to kill some Thalmor?'
User avatar
Allison C
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 11:02 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 9:13 pm

Lol no. supporting Ulfric =/= supporting Thalmor. Like I said previously, Ulfric has already shown a willingness to deal with the Imperials for Skyrim's best interests;

And when exactly did this happen? The peace conference I remember was Ulfric deciding to use a world-threatening crisis as a perfect opportunity to screw more concessions out of the Empire. The dude threatened to take his ball and go home and let Alduin the World-Eater rampage over everything because he knew that Tullius would have to back down rather than actually allow that to happen.

IOW, Ulfric took advantage of the fact that his opponent would be concerned for the welfare of Skyrim/Tamriel as a whole than Ulfric was. Which says a lot about Ulfric, and none of it good.

there's nothing to suggest he'd try and take them alone after winning his independence. More likely it'd be a case of 'okay we got out country back, now.. who wants to kill some Thalmor?'
Yes, because their odds would be so good with Skyrim all by itself. Especially a Skyrim weakened from a recent civil war.

Also, did you read 'The History of the Great War'? The main thing that let the Empire break the siege of the Imperial City was the arrival of the Nord expeditionary force. With Hammerfell gone, Skyrim is the last major military province the Empire has left. What does the next act of the Great War look like without it?

And before you go 'But a separate Skyrim could still ally with the Empire!'... no, no he couldn't. Listen to the Stormcloak agitprop. Ulfric is selling this to his people on a platform of '[censored] the Empire, the Empire is the Big Bad'; he's burning all his bridges there. Hell, the Stormcloak party line is that the Empire and the Thalmor are [censored] buddies.

There's also that the Empire would trust Ulfric since whenever? He's not exactly making a good impression with them, now is he? Even if Ulfric wanted to buddy up with the Empire next decade (and that's a huge freaking if, right there), its still anything but certain that the Emperor would ever go for it. Because let's face it, Ulfric has -- and this is on the record -- sold out and backstabbed every single side he's ever worked for, except his own. Man betrayed the Empire in the Great War, then he turned on his Thalmor handlers afterwards, then he murdered the High King, then he goes on to rampage against neutral jarls. Would you trust this dude in a political alliance ever? How could you? Every friend he's ever had got an axe buried between their shoulder blades.

Sure, the Thalmor ambassador's report says that a quick victory to the war is sub-optimal; they want both sides to weaken each other to the maximum extent before it finally ends. But in the long term, a Stormcloak victory is a human defeat, because what fought the Aldmeri Dominion to a tie the last time was a united empire -- a divided one can only improve their chances.
User avatar
Daniel Brown
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 11:21 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 6:01 am

And when exactly did this happen? The peace conference I remember was Ulfric deciding to use a world-threatening crisis as a perfect opportunity to screw more concessions out of the Empire. The dude threatened to take his ball and go home and let Alduin the World-Eater rampage over everything because he knew that Tullius would have to back down rather than actually allow that to happen.

IOW, Ulfric took advantage of the fact that his opponent would be concerned for the welfare of Skyrim/Tamriel as a whole than Ulfric was. Which says a lot about Ulfric, and none of it good.
Must have been a result of your dialogue choices, The only thing that got Ulfric like that at my peace conference was the fact a Thalmor was present.


Yes, because their odds would be so good with Skyrim all by itself. Especially a Skyrim weakened from a recent civil war.

Also, did you read 'The History of the Great War'? The main thing that let the Empire break the siege of the Imperial City was the arrival of the Nord expeditionary force. With Hammerfell gone, Skyrim is the last major military province the Empire has left.

Sure, the Thalmor ambassador's report says that a quick victory to the war is sub-optimal; they want both sides to weaken each other to the maximum extent before it finally ends. But in the long term, a Stormcloak victory is a human defeat, because what fought the Aldmeri Dominion to a tie the last time was a united empire -- a divided one can only improve their chances.
You're misunderstanding what I said. I'm saying it wouldn't be unreasonable for Ulfric to side with the empire in their war against the Thalmor after having his independence assured. He's not stupid, he'll ultimately do what he has to in order to get his way.

EDIT: you've added things to your post but I still disagree with you; without Skyrim the empire is finished, without the empire Skyrim cannot beat the Thalmor. Neither side is in a position to say 'yeah but we don't trust you'. They'd absolutely work together purely on the basis that they need to in order to survive; afterwards I have no doubt they'd go back to mugging each other off. Ulfric is no fool; if he had just won Skyrim, he wouldn't sit by and see it destroyed instantly afterwards.
User avatar
BlackaneseB
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:21 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 7:45 am

Must have been a result of your dialogue choices, The only thing that got Ulfric like that at my peace conference was the fact a Thalmor was present.
So, you entirely avoided the dialogue where Ulfric demanded that a city be handed over to him, and said that if he didn't get something, the conference was over?

EDIT: you've added things to your post but I still disagree with you; without Skyrim the empire is finished, without the empire Skyrim cannot beat the Thalmor. Neither side is in a position to say 'yeah but we don't trust you'. They'd absolutely work together purely on the basis that they need to in order to survive; afterwards I have no doubt they'd go back to mugging each other off.
IOW, we're back to 'Ulfric can act like a backstabbing douchenozzle but still get what he wants because his opponent is in no position to refuse his offer without dying'.

Which is exactly the same thing I saw happen at the peace table all over again -- Ulfric making out like a bandit off of someone else's desperation.

Yeah, this is not a good recommendation.

Does Ulfric ever accept a deal in which he personally comes out behind, for the greater good of the people as a whole? Not that I know of.
User avatar
W E I R D
 
Posts: 3496
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:08 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 4:51 am

Sure, the Thalmor ambassador's report says that a quick victory to the war is sub-optimal; they want both sides to weaken each other to the maximum extent before it finally ends. But in the long term, a Stormcloak victory is a human defeat, because what fought the Aldmeri Dominion to a tie the last time was a united empire -- a divided one can only improve their chances.

I agree. Only unity amongst the human races can assure victory over the Thalmor. I just don't see how killing Ulfric, but STILL banning Talos would help. Stormcloaks are not (despite the name) an Ulfric cult. Killing the man does not kill the cause - fighting would continue until the Stormcloaks had lost so much that they no longer care about the worship of Talos. By then Skyrim isn't worth much as a province.
User avatar
casey macmillan
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:37 pm

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 6:46 pm

Ulfric seems more like the type to just fortify Skyrim versus Aldmeri incursions and leaving Cyrodiil to fend for itself. He certainly doesn't want nords to die in a war soo far away from home.
User avatar
Yung Prince
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:45 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 2:40 am

You might remember that the Empire never actually enforced the Talos worship ban for decades after the White-Gold Concordat... until somebody publicly opened up a temple of Talos and threw it in the Thalmor's face, thus taking an arrangement which had been quietly working (the Empire gets their treaty, but the Nords still get their worship on the down-low, and the Thalmor get bupkis) and instead wrecking it and allowing the Thalmor Justicars a political "in" to demand rampage rights in Skyrim.

Oh, did I say 'somebody'? I meant 'Ulfric Stormcloak'.

Like I said earlier -- the guy originally caused the exact same crisis he's claiming to be the only solution for.
User avatar
Lauren Graves
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:03 pm

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 7:19 pm

Like I said earlier -- the guy originally caused the exact same crisis he's claiming to be the only solution for.
That doesn't mean that he is wrong.
Ulfric may have been the catalyst, but the sentiment that he represents would exist with or without him - that is what the Thalmor exploits.
User avatar
Etta Hargrave
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:27 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 9:24 pm

BOTH the imperials and Stormcloaks are being manipulated by the Thalmor. Overall though when you JUST take their views into account without the Thalmor dealings then I go with the imperials.
User avatar
lauren cleaves
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:35 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 8:05 pm

That doesn't mean that he is wrong.
I forgot to mention that Ulfric created the crisis at the Thalmor's instigation.

No, really. The Markarth Incident was where Ulfric demanded open Talos worship as the price of his having reclaimed the Reach for Skyrim, and as the Thalmor ambassador's files show, the Markarth Incident was done at the Thalmor's behest . It wasn't until after that that Ulfric went rogue from being a Thalmor agent... but by then, the damage had already been done.
User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 2:51 am

I forgot to mention that Ulfric created the crisis at the Thalmor's instigation.

No, really. The Markarth Incident was where Ulfric demanded open Talos worship as the price of his having reclaimed the Reach for Skyrim, and as the Thalmor ambassador's files show, the Markarth Incident was done at the Thalmor's behest . It wasn't until after that that Ulfric went rogue from being a Thalmor agent... but by then, the damage had already been done.
I think that the language in that dossier is way to ambiguous for you to consider this to be so. But even if, for the sake of the argument, I agree to this - Ulfric might still be the solution to the "problem". Creating a problem only you can fix seems like a sound albeit Machiavellian tactic.
Your character cannot change what happened in Markath before he/she arrived in Skyrim, but you can chose what side to join in the Civil War. Who started it is of no significance - nor is your or my feelings regarding Ulfric. Ulfric struck a nerve. He is a bit of an [censored], but people aren't joining his cause because they like arses. They support his goal - legal Talos worship in Skyrim. As long as the Empire enforces the ban on Talos-worship there will be unrest.
User avatar
Chris BEvan
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:40 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim