Am I the only one who sees the Imperials as the GOOD GUYS?

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 7:34 pm

I don't think the civil war is really over when we take the enemy stronghold, I mean it can't be over until the Jarl Moot and a new High King is selected.

I have become convinced that this will be the first major DLC, by choosing a side you stacked the deck, filling up the Holds with Jarls that support either Ulfric of Elisif. However, I think when the DLC drops we will be offered a 3rd option, becoming High King/Queen ourselves.

I mean we are the Dragonborn, and what have the Dragonborn done for thousands of years? Ruled the Empire.

Skyrim, I think, is about history repeating itself, the first dragonborn fighting Alduin, then going out and creating an Empire. Now we have to fulfill that function and create a new Empire. It will be like Shivering Isles but with the whole of Skyrim.
User avatar
Marion Geneste
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:21 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 1:36 am

I can almost sympathize with the Empire. It's in a terrible position.

But that is no excuse. The greatest duty of all men of arms is the protection of the innocent. Those who raise those arms against the innocent, or sheathe them when others do, should have those arms removed.
User avatar
Jessica White
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:03 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 1:45 am

Oh, and I'd like to support any Thalmer DLC. There's no way Bethesda crafted this new enemy without eventually giving us the opportunity to smash them.

Heck, that works for Imperial and Stormcloak supporters, so it wouldn't even conflict with the ongoing story.

Itkovian
User avatar
Alada Vaginah
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:31 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 8:46 am

After reading Ulfric's dossier from the Thalmor embassy, and finding out he was released by the Thalmor after being captured, and kept in contact with them, I joined the Imperials.

If that is what you read, you have no comprehension.
User avatar
Suzy Santana
 
Posts: 3572
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:02 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 7:25 pm

If that is what you read, you have no comprehension.
He read that the Thalmor supports them - even unknowingly - that is good enough evidence to see that the Stormcloaks fighting the Empire is a win in the Thalmor's eyes.
User avatar
NAtIVe GOddess
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:46 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 8:37 pm

He read that the Thalmor supports them - even unknowingly - that is good enough evidence to see that the Stormcloaks fighting the Empire is a win in the Thalmor's eyes.


Ulfred is not in contact with them, and not an active agent of them. He is being used by them yes, but not knowingly as he inferred.
User avatar
Antony Holdsworth
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 4:50 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 6:37 pm

Seriously, I did the Stormcloak line first, thinking "why should I help the Imperials when they tried to lop my head off?", though after attacking Whiterun and listening to what the Jarl had to say, my view of the Stormcloaks shifted. I play a Redguard and it struck me that the Stormcloaks, though they may have some right, are a bunch of racists douchebags who want Skyrim back for themselves just so they can continue long-dead traditions and get all non-Nordic races out of their nation. Seriously, at least the Empire makes the world a better place for everyone. If you talk to the people of Whiterun after the Stormcloak dictation, you discover that everyone, even the Nords, preferred the Empire too.

TL;DR, Stormcloaks are racist bastards who care about nothing but themselves.


I can only agree!

The Empire may have it's flaws. I mean we don't have Democracy in Tamriel, it is a medieval setting. We must keep that in mind. But with all it's flaws, indeed the alternative to the Empire is racism everywhere. In the Empire race didn't matter. Everyone could become someone! But what I see in those Stormcloaks is indeed mostly "Skyrim for Nords" racism. Since I always supported the Empire in Elder Scrolls as "personal friend of Uriel Septim VII", it was a clear decision for me anyway. For a while I had sympathy with the Stormcloaks, until I saw a bit behind the curtain.

On top, if the Nords of Skyrim really delcared independence, the Aldmeri Dominion would simply conquer the human kingdoms one by one. And how far will they go anyway? Until every tiny village is it's own kingdom? See how Ulfric treated everyone they felt belonged to the Foresworn. Nah, the Stormcloaks are just selfish racists.

Long live the Empire! ^^
User avatar
Queen
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:00 pm

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 9:46 pm

reason i didn't go imperial is because of beheading, but not just that if your a criminal your a criminal you get beheaded, but turns out you weren't even on the list to die and they STILL wanted to kill you just for fun! ulfric on the other hand is a guy who walked up to the high king, challenged him to 1 on 1 combat, then let out a shout that tore his body apart.
so police who take innocents hostage and murder them?
or a man fighting for his country who has atleast the balls to challenge somebody 1 on 1 and win.


So because one Officer is incompetent you let all of humanity fall under Altmer-Nazi rule? Great...
User avatar
MR.BIGG
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 12:52 am

So because one Officer is incompetent you let all of humanity fall under Altmer-Nazi rule? Great...
the man-races are kinda lame, so I'm ok with this :P
User avatar
phil walsh
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:46 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 4:22 am

I don't help the Imperials because they're essentially controlled by the Thalmor.


The Thalmor are powerful enough; they don't need Skyrim.



That being said, I don't like the Stormcloaks either. I just stayed out of it
Spoiler
my only involvement was the peace conference at High Hrothgar because I hadn't joined either one (you have to do it to convince Jarl Bulgruuf to let you use Dragonsreach to capture a dragon). I gave Markarth and Falkreath to the Stormcloaks, and Riften to the Empire.
So the game doesn't force you to join either one? Rawk. :celebration:
User avatar
Prue
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:27 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 9:09 pm

Considering the fact, that the people playing this game that are into the lore and read all the books in the game say, "join the empire the thalmos want the storm cloaks to regain skyrim. So they have one less faction to fight when against the empire".

When you see the Thalmos roaming the lands they tell you to get away they are on a important delivery and if you dont they will attack.

I would say if you want to go along with the lore join the empire, but if you want to have fun join the Storm cloaks because they attack citys.
User avatar
matt
 
Posts: 3267
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 10:17 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 12:29 am

If that is what you read, you have no comprehension.

It explicitly stated that Ulfric maintained contact with the Thalmor until the "Markarth incident". Try to sound like less of an asshat next time you try to correct someone, especially if you're not entirely sure yourself.
User avatar
Nikki Hype
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 1:46 am

"join the empire the thalmos want the storm cloaks to regain skyrim.

as already said, they do not whant that.
they want them to fight each other but a stormclaks victory must be avoided.

imo who win is not that different for them, if the empire win they'll become stable again and will be able to fight the thalmore.
if the stormclaks win, they'll fight the thalmore (sorry i don't think they can just watch as their neighbor get detroyed w/o doing anything) as soon as they'll invade the empire ( since they know thalmore is the real enemy. the second in command say it during their quest line )
User avatar
Lavender Brown
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:37 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 1:10 am

as already said, they do not whant that.
they want them to fight each other but a stormclaks victory must be avoided.

imo who win is not that different for them, if the empire win they'll become stable again and will be able to fight the thalmore.
if the stormclaks win, they'll fight the thalmore (sorry i don't think they can just watch as their neighbor get detroyed w/o doing anything) as soon as they'll invade the empire ( since they know thalmore is the real enemy. the second in command say it during their quest line )

From what I've read and heard, I believe the Thalmor would rather the Stormcloaks win the war than the Empire even though they don't want either of them to win. Even if the Stormcloaks win, they will be in no position to fight the Thalmor since the war would have taken it's toll on their armies. If they were having trouble with a Legion that was at less than 50% strength, how could they be victorious against the Aldmeri Dominion which crushed 3 Legions?
User avatar
jessica sonny
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:27 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 4:19 am

The entire Stormcloak cause is undermined by the fact that Ulfric's a total tool. Their cause isn't necessarily bad. They've just had the misfortune to rally around a [censored].

Although I still sympathise more with the Empire because it needs stability right now to combat the far more important threat of the Aldmeri Dominion.
User avatar
Yvonne
 
Posts: 3577
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:05 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 10:36 pm

The redguards fought the Thalmor (by themselves?), and won their land back, and freedom. The empire has to realize the position it's in, things are never going to be the same again, you can continue to fight it, weakening themselves, and the other races, or they can accept their new reality. That being to allow the nords to also secede, but in return gaining an alliance with them, and hopefully with the redguards, high rock, and possibly some bosmer and khajiit, to defeat the Thalmor.
User avatar
Jarrett Willis
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:01 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 5:38 am

Being an anarchocapitalist, I can't agree with your statement. Anything that has any sort of central rule is foolish.
User avatar
Len swann
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:02 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 2:48 am

The Empire outlawed Talos worship because of the White Tower Concordance, and let the Thalmar execute anyone they think worships Talos. So screw the Empire, we'll fight the Aldmeri Dominion on our own if we have to!
User avatar
xxLindsAffec
 
Posts: 3604
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:39 pm

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 8:42 pm

It seems to me that the two sides arn't Good and Bad like black and white, They both have many shades of grey.
User avatar
Theodore Walling
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:48 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 4:53 am

Put this into perspective. The empire is the only one keeping the damn Thalmor at bay while their emperor risks looking like a coward and traitor to save his people and Ulfric is just another usurper king trying for power, candycoating his goals with "Freedom fighting" :D. Also note not even most nords want outsiders gone. Its just the stormcloaks and their supporters.
User avatar
Jade Barnes-Mackey
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:29 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 11:11 pm

For me, the decision came down to who was more of an [censored]. Imperials had no evidence of criminal activity, but decided to behead me anyway. The Stormcloaks are racist idiots. One was a case of unfair justice, but the other is a faulty ideology. I'm offended by both sides, but at least the Imperials have a chance for long term success; the Stormcloaks are just making a mess.
User avatar
Sarah Evason
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:47 pm

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 6:18 am

they took the realistic approach
no such thing as good guys

think I won't do any of the 2 qeusts and just kill imperials and stormcloacks whenever I see fit
all power hungry bastards in my eyes
User avatar
Kieren Thomson
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:28 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 8:43 am

Seriously, at least the Empire makes the world a better place for everyone.

Wait, because they want to expel an army of foreign invaders who are imposing their own laws and customs over your own, that makes them racists? The Empire isn't a democracy, it's not particularly enlightened or benevolent. Without benevolent rule or consent of the governed, what's the legitimacy of their government? You could make the point that Tiber Septim was a Nord, and thus the founding dynasty would be a legitimate rule of Skyrim, but the heirs of Tiber Septim's body were slain in 3E 53, and the throne was usurped by the the Dunmer, as described in 'The Madness of Pelagius'.

So, you've got an empire that's run by and for foreigners occupying your homeland, for no better reason than the throne they usurped once belonged to a man who came from your country. Seems to me like the Stormcloaks are entirely in the right.
User avatar
steve brewin
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:17 am

Post » Thu May 24, 2012 9:30 pm

I don't understand... is Skyrim and the empire at risk of falling under invasion at some point in the game? Or are all of you just following lore and assuming a staunch role to play? Could a war with the dominion be possible DLC or something and whatever you chose have an effect then?
User avatar
Kirsty Wood
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Fri May 25, 2012 1:51 am

Alot of you guys are saying how skyrim needs to remain under Empire control in order for humans as a whole to survive but perhaps you guys should consider the possibility that skyrim could still hold out against the Thalmor through divine intervention and that the empire would not be needed at all!!!

Perhaps with skyrim under Stormcloak hands reintroducing Talos worship, Talos might intervene and stop the Thalmor extermination of all humans :talk:
User avatar
Dorian Cozens
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:47 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim