I agree on what you said, its a second gen of processors with AMD II...
But I dont agree on last sentence you wrote that he can pull out high on 1080p with that PC...
No way on that one though with 2 gigs of RAM and GTS250 its a directX 10 card, which means he's performance will suffer in some way, because of performance boost feature with dx11 cards, plus the card is pretty darn old 2009...
I am not saying the card is BAD, but I would not lay my hopes into high settings on 1080p with that card and 2 gigs of RAM definetly...
But I didn't say high...said medium-high. And RAM doesn't have much of a bearing on fps performance. Load times and overall smoothness, yes.
What do people think of this?
Intel core I3 550 3.2 (2 cores)
Radeon HD 5570 1GB
4GB RAM
Direct X 11
Windows 7 64 bit
Maybe medium with that if 1080p is res.
Hey there, thanks for responding like this, it makes a world of difference.
So here are my specs:
Graphics Card: Nvidia GeForce GTX 260M
CPU: Intel Core2 Duo CPU P7360 @ 2.00GHz (this guy is my concern, being a Duo Core)
Ram: 4 GB
OS: Windows 7 64bit
Resolution: 1366x768
It's a laptop, so overclocking probably isn't a good idea for me. Here goes!
The min requirements stating a 2.0GHz dual-core chip nevers explicitly says
what dual-core chip. I have asked this questions to the ones that have made the requirements and still no answers. Pentium D's were dual-core ship, albeit rather poor ones....your chip is much faster than any of those. Then there are the Athlon 64 X2's from days past...now there were even 1.6-1.8GHz X2's back in the day. I can only presume that the requirements are based off of those because they are dual-core chips too.
I still see you getting at least medium-high with your notebook considering the resolution.
hey, can someone tell me how they think my PC will fair?
AMD phenom II x4 965 @3.6ghz
Radeon hd 5700
8GB ddr3 ram
I'd like to play it in full hd 1080
Thanks for any help

Which Radeon 5700...5750 or 5770? The former gets you medium-high, the latter in high.
Also I thought for the 295 sli wasn't an issue for game compatibility because the architecture being on one card made it invisible to the game. As such a game didn't need to be sli scalable to realize the advatage of a 295, any thoughts? I can tell you that the comp settings doesn't require it to be in sli mode because the card only uses on slot ergo one pci bus
I've read of this before that the internal implementation of SLI is different than if it was two physical cards....not sure how true that is.